♥ a1r𝙗𝙚𝙚 — CS2 Stats

DE76561197976084770[U:1:15819042]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,505Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,513Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating25,678Top 10% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#15691 of 258858 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,827 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Oct 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,678 +1,020 23 Jun – 20 Oct · 27 days played

Faceit ELO: 1,827 +0 7 Sept – 25 Sept · 2 observations

26,807Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,827Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

42Days played since 2026-06-21

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,827
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 174 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-07
Level 8 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

1,129 below peak (26,807)
-295 over 30 days · steady
+3,731 over 90 days
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,322 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-09-07
Pink band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

Metric	Last 30	Previous 30	Change
Matches	97	—	—
Win rate	49%	—	—
K/D	0.91	—	—
Headshot %	45%	—	—

Measured 25 Sep 2026 → 30 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	46.7%	46.8%	48.2%	1.6% short
Shot accuracy	11.3%	13.0%	13.2%	1.9% short
Kill/death ratio	0.92	1.06	1.07	0.15 short
Match win rate	46.8%	46.3%	46.9%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning56

Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–39–4Last 10057%Win rateWTWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.6pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–1–1 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 536ms

Last 10

4–5–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 515ms

Last 20

9–10–1 · 45% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 523ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.1

Utility7.2

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels4.3

Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning5.6

Utility7.2

Mechanics6.9

Opening Duels4.1

Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time529ms−36ms

first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms

Headshot accuracy18.0%+0.3%

first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 22 Sept →

33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 14 Sept →

344msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 3 Oct →

13–1Biggest win · inferno, 3 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak

8–1In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 36anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	36	25–11	69%	0.01
inferno	A	27	17–10	63%	0.01
cache	C	16	6–10	38%	-0.01
anubis	D	10	2–8	20%	-0.01
mirage	A	5	3–2	60%	0.01
nuke	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.03
ancient	—	3	2–1	67%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

102,957Lifetime kills

0.92K/D

4,762Matches

46.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players

46.7%Headshot %

11.3%Shot accuracy

12,908MVPs

2,791Hours (in match)

4,483Bombs planted

1,004Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4735,817

M4A4 / M4A1-S17,644

AWP11,749

Desert Eagle8,846

P2000 / USP-S6,750

Glock-185,165

Knife2,071

MP91,921

P2501,832

MAC-101,555

Lifetime map wins

16,765inferno

9,201dust2

2,583cbble

2,505train

1,222nuke

483vertigo

95shorttrain

66aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

537Matches

55%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

81.8ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	68	69%	0.98	14.5
Dust2	64	59%	1.11	15.7
Anubis	46	48%	1.02	15.3
Ancient	21	38%	0.98	17.1
Overpass	14	57%	0.96	16.5
Mirage	10	60%	1.40	18.0
Train	9	56%	1.11	16.3
Vertigo	6	67%	1.00	14.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy

33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.0%Spray accuracy

81.0%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

526msReaction time

30.1%T opening success

63.0%CT opening success

0.81Enemies flashed / flash

9.2%Flash assists

11.78HE damage / grenade

10.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.1001% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–3	0.00	13%	21 Oct →
cache	12–12	0.02	18%	21 Oct →
mirage	13–8	0.03	21%	20 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	13%	18 Oct →
inferno	13–6	0.05	14%	15 Oct →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	8%	11 Oct →
mirage	5–13	0.04	16%	11 Oct →
inferno	13–11	0.02	20%	11 Oct →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	15%	8 Oct →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	32%	3 Oct →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	7%	3 Oct →
inferno	3–9	-0.26	31%	2 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.10	19%	25 Sept →
cache	13–3	0.11	22%	25 Sept →
dust2	6–13	-0.08	20%	22 Sept →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	21%	22 Sept →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	10%	22 Sept →
inferno	9–4	0.16	26%	22 Sept →
inferno	9–5	0.07	18%	21 Sept →
inferno	9–0	0.11	11%	15 Sept →
inferno	9–5	0.04	15%	15 Sept →
inferno	9–1	0.15	28%	15 Sept →
inferno	9–2	0.08	29%	15 Sept →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	33%	14 Sept →
dust2	13–9	0.04	18%	14 Sept →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	14%	8 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	17%	8 Sept →
mirage	13–3	0.01	15%	8 Sept →
inferno	13–3	0.07	11%	31 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.01	19%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.02	14%	22 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.03	14%	22 Aug →
inferno	8–8	0.04	13%	21 Aug →
inferno	5–9	-0.08	25%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	9%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	20%	15 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	10%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	22%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	11%	13 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.04	18%	13 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	17%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.01	14%	11 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.01	10%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.00	15%	11 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.05	11%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.01	4%	10 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.03	19%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	15%	10 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	11%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	12%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	13%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.08	12%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	27%	4 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.03	20%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.02	18%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.13	19%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–1	-0.00	7%	3 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.02	5%	3 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	15%	3 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	14%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.02	8%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.02	15%	27 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.03	20%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.05	12%	27 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.06	12%	23 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.03	24%	21 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	21%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.06	18%	21 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.04	24%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.08	13%	21 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.04	14%	20 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	15%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.05	26%	20 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.00	16%	20 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	11%	18 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.09	21%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.01	24%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.06	14%	14 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	15%	13 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.12	28%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.06	14%	13 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.01	16%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.04	24%	12 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.07	11%	12 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	16%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	7%	12 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.00	27%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.06	28%	11 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	21%	8 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.07	20%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.04	13%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.07	15%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.04	17%	3 Jul →
anubis	16–13	0.01	17%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.08	24%	30 Jun →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	12%	30 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	10%	29 Jun →
ancient	13–7	-0.04	11%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.01	19%	23 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	21%	21 Jun →