Glariuz

Glariuz — CS2 Stats

76561197976017414[U:1:15751686]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,603Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,882Top 25% of 204,316 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23431 of 251375 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,906 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 24,882 → 24,882
0Faceit ELO · 1,906 → 1,906
+9Tracked matches · now 1,603
−3.3ppWin rate · 56.7% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,882 -1,092 25 Jul – 21 Sept · 6 days played
24,88225,974peak 25,97425 Jul21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,906 +0 2 Sept – 21 Sept · 3 observations
1,9061,906peak 1,9062 Sept21 Sept
26,004Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,906Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-05-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,906
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 95 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,092 below peak (25,974)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 118 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGlariuzFACEITLevel 10 · 1,906 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,882 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,906csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning49
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateLLLLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · +53ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility6.4
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.9
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time533ms−92ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 14 Jul →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · cache, 11 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · nuke, 13 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 21 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L7Current streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 59% over 17infernoWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB2312–1152%-0.02
cacheB1910–953%0.01
nukeA1710–759%0.02
ancientC156–940%-0.01
dust2A127–558%0.01
infernoD103–730%-0.01
mirage—31–233%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,306Matches
52%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
73.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke15362%1.0914.8
Ancient12543%1.0014.8
Inferno11754%1.0313.9
Anubis10947%0.8913.5
Dust29156%1.0614.4
Train6060%1.0714.7
Overpass5256%1.1214.2
Mirage5030%0.9313.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.7%Spray accuracy
73.1%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
537msReaction time
34.5%T opening success
35.5%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
10.83HE damage / grenade
10.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.4831% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.0127%11 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0318%4 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.1013%20 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.045%19 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0527%19 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0329%19 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0317%19 Sept →
nuke13–70.0315%19 Sept →
dust213–100.0534%14 Sept →
cache13–70.0213%14 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0124%14 Sept →
nuke13–80.0224%13 Sept →
anubis13–80.0520%10 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0016%10 Sept →
ancient6–130.0111%10 Sept →
nuke13–90.0728%10 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0117%8 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0029%8 Sept →
dust213–100.1018%6 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0129%5 Sept →
ancient13–110.0431%5 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0122%5 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0020%5 Sept →
inferno12–160.0228%4 Sept →
cache13–80.1127%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0225%4 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.038%4 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0717%2 Sept →
nuke9–130.0122%2 Sept →
ancient13–90.0211%31 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0124%31 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0416%26 Aug →
nuke13–100.0110%26 Aug →
inferno11–130.0226%25 Aug →
ancient13–70.0123%25 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0226%25 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0623%24 Aug →
anubis13–50.0424%24 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0416%24 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0322%24 Aug →
dust213–60.0631%20 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0118%20 Aug →
cache13–70.1027%20 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0813%19 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0216%19 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0421%19 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0410%18 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0227%18 Aug →
anubis13–40.0218%18 Aug →
cache11–130.0318%17 Aug →
anubis19–17-0.0417%16 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0114%16 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0135%16 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0523%16 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0628%16 Aug →
ancient13–80.0516%16 Aug →
nuke13–110.0115%16 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0518%13 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0110%13 Aug →
cache16–140.0115%13 Aug →
cache13–80.0543%11 Aug →
dust28–130.0131%11 Aug →
cache11–130.0429%11 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.068%11 Aug →
cache13–110.0426%9 Aug →
ancient16–190.0320%9 Aug →
cache13–16-0.0115%30 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0122%29 Jul →
nuke22–19-0.0121%27 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0414%27 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.008%27 Jul →
anubis13–16-0.0413%26 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0118%26 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0716%26 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0112%26 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0214%26 Jul →
anubis13–60.0623%25 Jul →
inferno15–15-0.0326%25 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0123%25 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0219%25 Jul →
inferno1–13-0.0413%25 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0114%25 Jul →
ancient13–100.0215%25 Jul →
cache13–80.0529%25 Jul →
dust216–13-0.0115%21 Jul →
anubis13–20.064%21 Jul →
nuke13–40.0522%21 Jul →
nuke13–20.1522%14 Jul →
mirage13–100.0115%14 Jul →
anubis10–130.0119%14 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0222%14 Jul →
nuke12–160.0819%13 Jul →
cache13–40.1018%13 Jul →
inferno13–70.0433%13 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0232%13 Jul →
nuke13–40.0619%13 Jul →
anubis16–13-0.0710%10 May →
anubis5–13-0.0825%5 May →
overpass13–20.0536%5 May →
cache13–110.0023%3 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.