mjärGen

mjärGen — CS2 Stats

FI76561197998143619[U:1:37877891]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

4,307Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,971Top 50% of 204,316 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#83377 of 251375 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,054 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,971 +1,991 1 Sept – 11 Oct · 8 days played
17,98019,971peak 19,9711 Sept11 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,054 +0 6 Sept – 4 Oct · 4 observations
2,0542,054peak 2,0546 Sept4 Oct
19,971Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,054Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-08-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,054
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 446 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,971
  • +1,991 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 29 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmjärGenFACEITLevel 8 · 2,054 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,971 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,054csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning63
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–45Last 10055%Win rateWWLWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · −66ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility6.5
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning6.3
Utility6.5
Mechanics3.2
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time536ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 4–3 · cache, 2 Sept →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · nuke, 23 Sept →
336msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 18 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 27ancientWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2718–967%-0.01
ancientC188–1044%-0.02
cacheA1710–759%-0.00
anubisC167–944%-0.03
infernoB136–746%-0.01
dust2A74–357%-0.02
mirage—22–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,336Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
71.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke25462%1.0815.1
Inferno24650%0.9714.0
Ancient23051%0.9113.3
Anubis18743%0.8913.7
Mirage16340%0.9413.8
Dust214343%0.8913.3
Overpass7054%0.9113.9
Vertigo5735%0.9314.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
64.5%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
534msReaction time
52.0%T opening success
44.1%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
7.39HE damage / grenade
17.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–9-0.0311%11 Oct →
nuke19–160.0325%11 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0216%11 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0316%11 Oct →
cache11–130.0317%11 Oct →
nuke13–00.1016%11 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0329%11 Oct →
mirage13–90.0623%11 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0830%10 Oct →
ancient13–50.108%10 Oct →
nuke13–100.0216%10 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0315%10 Oct →
cache3–13-0.117%10 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0515%10 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0128%10 Oct →
nuke19–160.0115%9 Oct →
cache16–13-0.0221%9 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0212%9 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.1120%9 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0518%9 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0327%6 Oct →
ancient10–130.0123%6 Oct →
inferno11–130.0022%4 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0014%4 Oct →
cache13–10.0519%4 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0130%30 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0313%30 Sept →
anubis16–12-0.0118%28 Sept →
mirage13–100.0011%25 Sept →
nuke13–10.1053%23 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0316%23 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0817%23 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0513%22 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0041%22 Sept →
nuke13–100.0119%21 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0215%21 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0224%21 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0317%21 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0218%21 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0311%21 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0422%20 Sept →
dust213–10.0113%20 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.078%20 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0521%20 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0318%20 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0018%20 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0222%19 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0424%19 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0224%19 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0214%19 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0622%19 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0123%19 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0310%19 Sept →
nuke13–70.0339%18 Sept →
nuke13–60.0236%18 Sept →
inferno13–70.0226%18 Sept →
cache13–3-0.0017%18 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0225%16 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0321%16 Sept →
cache11–130.0132%15 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0129%15 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0218%14 Sept →
cache13–70.0130%14 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0417%14 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0422%13 Sept →
nuke8–130.0129%11 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0133%10 Sept →
inferno13–90.0425%10 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0510%10 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0029%10 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0129%8 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0417%8 Sept →
nuke16–120.0124%8 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0013%8 Sept →
ancient13–90.0722%8 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.0513%6 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0124%6 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0415%6 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0119%4 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0417%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.1018%4 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.057%4 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0923%2 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0510%2 Sept →
cache4–30.2243%2 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0218%1 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0217%1 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0813%1 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0226%1 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0018%1 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0125%1 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.059%31 Aug →
inferno13–100.0112%31 Aug →
ancient13–90.0011%31 Aug →
anubis13–90.0315%31 Aug →
anubis9–130.0113%26 Aug →
nuke13–100.0125%26 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0624%26 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0126%26 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0315%25 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.