AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGRENADE

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGRENADE — CS2 Stats

76561197972842171[U:1:12576443]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,617Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,763Hours in CS39Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,000 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate29.4%42.7%43.8%14.4% short
Shot accuracy6.1%11.3%12.0%6.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.910.991.020.11 short
Match win rate41.1%43.9%44.7%3.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA…FACEITLevel 4 · 1,000 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning59
Utility16

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43516Last 10043%Win rateLWWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · −62ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility1.6
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch6.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 41% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.9
Utility1.6
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time565ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy11.4%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 10.8% → last ⅓ avg 11.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 5–1 · vertigo, 9 Sept
24%Best headshot accuracy · 5–1 · vertigo, 9 Sept
328msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 17 Sept
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 13 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
16In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 71% over 14nukeWeakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC2071335%-0.01
nukeD1641225%-0.00
vertigoS1410471%0.01
mirageC135838%0.00
ancientC114736%-0.03
infernoA116555%0.01
anubisC83538%-0.00
trainA53260%-0.01
overpass110100%0.04
dust21010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

71,654Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
4,808Matches
41.1%Match win rate
29.4%Headshot %
6.1%Shot accuracy
8,959MVPs
1,609Hours (in match)
7,243Bombs planted
731Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Negev30,836
AK-474,548
MAC-104,042
AWP2,929
P901,852
MP91,393
AUG1,342

Lifetime map wins

7,175inferno
5,487nuke
4,657vertigo
1,827office
1,149train
1,129dust2
317lake
182cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
75%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
77.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke2100%1.0818.0
Inferno10%0.7625.0
Mirage1100%0.9212.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.3%Headshot accuracy
25.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
60.4%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
568msReaction time
59.7%T opening success
41.1%CT opening success
0.07Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
11.22HE damage / grenade
0.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.267% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.0707 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–13-0.076%18 Sept
cache13–8-0.0411%18 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0115%18 Sept
ancient7–130.009%17 Sept
cache4–13-0.065%17 Sept
mirage13–100.1214%17 Sept
vertigo3–130.006%17 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0114%17 Sept
anubis13–90.0315%17 Sept
train13–8-0.073%17 Sept
cache4–13-0.0714%17 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0418%16 Sept
vertigo13–100.024%16 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0314%16 Sept
train13–20.057%16 Sept
nuke13–70.039%16 Sept
vertigo13–8-0.059%15 Sept
inferno4–13-0.098%15 Sept
cache6–13-0.054%15 Sept
vertigo2–13-0.0710%15 Sept
mirage5–130.0410%15 Sept
overpass11–50.0412%15 Sept
inferno13–70.0216%15 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0714%15 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0610%15 Sept
cache13–6-0.0221%15 Sept
vertigo13–9-0.0312%13 Sept
ancient13–1-0.0221%13 Sept
inferno13–80.027%13 Sept
cache7–130.0219%13 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0411%13 Sept
ancient13–70.0112%12 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0018%12 Sept
dust25–13-0.0515%12 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0814%12 Sept
cache13–50.038%12 Sept
inferno7–90.048%11 Sept
vertigo13–80.0913%11 Sept
ancient3–13-0.124%11 Sept
cache8–13-0.0311%11 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0319%11 Sept
nuke12–120.0310%11 Sept
vertigo13–5-0.056%11 Sept
mirage13–80.038%11 Sept
nuke13–100.0713%11 Sept
inferno13–40.029%11 Sept
cache10–13-0.0113%11 Sept
inferno13–80.0014%10 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0510%10 Sept
vertigo13–70.0315%10 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0115%10 Sept
nuke13–4-0.0110%9 Sept
vertigo11–13-0.0215%9 Sept
cache5–13-0.0412%9 Sept
cache6–13-0.048%9 Sept
nuke13–50.079%9 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0119%9 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0213%9 Sept
vertigo5–10.1624%9 Sept
cache4–130.029%9 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0716%8 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0712%8 Sept
mirage13–80.007%8 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0010%8 Sept
train9–13-0.016%6 Sept
cache7–13-0.056%6 Sept
anubis8–13-0.016%6 Sept
cache5–130.036%6 Sept
vertigo13–9-0.0010%6 Sept
train7–130.0016%5 Sept
anubis13–20.068%5 Sept
nuke9–130.037%5 Sept
cache13–6-0.0112%5 Sept
mirage11–130.0315%5 Sept
mirage11–13-0.046%4 Sept
cache8–130.0310%4 Sept
ancient9–130.0211%4 Sept
mirage8–20.0612%4 Sept
inferno9–130.0011%4 Sept
nuke9–13-0.026%4 Sept
ancient11–13-0.018%3 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0511%3 Sept
vertigo13–40.1211%3 Sept
nuke6–130.0510%2 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0212%2 Sept
inferno13–40.0824%2 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0412%2 Sept
mirage8–13-0.068%2 Sept
cache13–60.009%28 Aug
cache12–120.0211%28 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0115%28 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.0012%27 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0710%27 Aug
inferno13–70.069%27 Aug
nuke10–130.038%27 Aug
cache13–50.0813%27 Aug
vertigo13–60.0110%27 Aug
nuke12–120.0011%27 Aug
train13–7-0.0311%27 Aug
cache13–60.0411%26 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →