Sauvage Extraordinair

Sauvage Extraordinair — CS2 Stats

NL76561197972568567[U:1:12302839]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,337Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,666Hours in CS53Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 7 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,000 +1,927 28 Jun12 Sept · 17 days played
12,92715,000peak 15,00028 Jun12 Sept
15,100Peak Premier in tracked matches
39Days played since 2026-04-07

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 15,000
  • +694 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,927 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2925+4
Win rate45%40%+5pp
K/D0.790.93−0.13
Headshot %44%42%+2pp

Measured 9 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,017), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate42.1%43.8%44.8%2.7% short
Shot accuracy17.0%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.121.021.04above
Match win rate38.2%44.7%45.2%7.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSauvage ExtraordinairFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning50
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50482Last 10050%Win rateLWWWTLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility5.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.0
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time586ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy12.8%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 12.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 10 Aug
35%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · ancient, 26 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · inferno, 19 Aug
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 26 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
412In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8nukeWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB23111248%-0.02
anubisC1881044%-0.02
mirageB168850%-0.03
nukeC146843%-0.03
infernoC94544%-0.02
cacheA85363%0.02
dust2A53260%-0.01
boulder330100%0.04
overpass21150%-0.02
shelter1010%0.02
fachwerk110100%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

95,025Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
5,153Matches
38.2%Match win rate
42.1%Headshot %
17.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
8,407MVPs
1,830Hours (in match)
3,850Bombs planted
1,116Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,774
MP98,213
MAC-103,716
SG 5533,671
FAMAS3,642
UMP-453,631

Lifetime map wins

7,504inferno
4,404vertigo
3,592dust2
2,589nuke
1,168train
328cbble
276office
174lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

143Matches
55%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
72.2ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno875%0.9813.9
Mirage862%0.7813.0
Anubis771%1.2615.7
Nuke667%1.0011.2
Vertigo450%1.1415.5
Ancient475%1.1219.3
Cache250%1.0014.5
Overpass250%0.7411.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.8%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
73.8%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
586msReaction time
37.8%T opening success
33.2%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
2.6%Flash assists
8.85HE damage / grenade
21.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.8064% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.497 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.8254% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–13-0.038%12 Sept
cache13–40.0516%12 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0318%12 Sept
inferno13–80.027%11 Sept
anubis15–150.0115%11 Sept
cache11–13-0.097%11 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0915%10 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0613%9 Sept
mirage13–30.057%8 Sept
dust213–7-0.0516%8 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0110%8 Sept
dust213–90.0918%7 Sept
nuke13–70.0116%7 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0411%7 Sept
nuke11–13-0.098%7 Sept
ancient13–50.0213%7 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0810%2 Sept
cache14–16-0.0415%2 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0515%2 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0211%19 Aug
ancient6–130.0016%19 Aug
inferno13–2-0.069%19 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0413%19 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0413%17 Aug
cache16–13-0.0114%17 Aug
inferno13–110.0318%13 Aug
anubis10–13-0.028%12 Aug
ancient13–110.0112%12 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0821%11 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0110%11 Aug
nuke6–13-0.1021%11 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0610%11 Aug
ancient13–7-0.027%10 Aug
cache13–30.118%10 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0813%10 Aug
cache12–16-0.0116%10 Aug
inferno13–70.0515%7 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0013%6 Aug
cache13–30.1013%5 Aug
ancient5–13-0.1210%5 Aug
anubis13–30.0315%5 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0323%5 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0412%4 Aug
ancient13–80.0222%4 Aug
mirage13–50.0713%4 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0517%4 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0321%4 Aug
nuke2–13-0.085%2 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0514%2 Aug
mirage13–4-0.087%1 Aug
nuke13–60.0519%31 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0111%31 Jul
anubis13–50.0616%31 Jul
boulder13–90.0817%30 Jul
boulder13–40.0520%30 Jul
shelter7–130.0220%30 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0224%30 Jul
nuke13–60.0116%29 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0210%29 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0311%28 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0018%28 Jul
anubis13–100.0221%28 Jul
boulder13–8-0.028%28 Jul
fachwerk13–11-0.098%27 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0624%27 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0815%26 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0335%26 Jul
anubis13–10.0318%26 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0017%21 Jul
cache13–20.0316%21 Jul
dust213–90.059%29 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0219%29 Jun
dust214–16-0.0517%28 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0710%28 Jun
ancient13–80.0631%28 Jun
ancient2–13-0.049%28 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0114%28 Jun
ancient1–13-0.0413%28 Jun
mirage5–13-0.1123%28 Jun
overpass1–13-0.0730%27 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0916%30 May
ancient16–13-0.0312%19 May
mirage8–130.0115%19 May
ancient9–13-0.0516%19 May
nuke13–80.0410%19 May
anubis13–10-0.0315%18 May
inferno9–13-0.0318%18 May
ancient13–4-0.0316%17 May
dust26–13-0.0914%17 May
mirage13–90.023%14 May
anubis13–9-0.0815%14 May
ancient15–15-0.0314%14 May
ancient11–130.0320%13 May
overpass13–50.0310%13 May
nuke4–13-0.088%13 May
anubis5–13-0.0230%7 May
ancient13–50.019%6 May
anubis13–10-0.0215%6 May
mirage9–13-0.0817%29 Apr
inferno4–9-0.0426%7 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →