Tumples

Tumples — CS2 Stats

FI76561197970772110[U:1:10506382]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,519Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,131Hours in CS28Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.6 Learning
Premier CS Rating10,318Blue band · top ~53.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10075 of 13823 tracked
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTumplesPREMIER10,318 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim28
Positioning32
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41581Last 10041%Win rateLWLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.8
Aggression4.6
Utility5.5
Positioning3.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 58% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.8
Positioning3.2
Utility5.5
Mechanics1.8
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact0.6

Composite 2.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time590ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy7.6%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 6.9% → last ⅓ avg 7.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.06Best rating — nuke 13–7
131Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 57% over 21infernoWeakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2112957%-0.02
ancientD2171433%-0.04
anubisB1910953%-0.03
infernoD1541127%-0.02
cacheD113827%-0.04
dust241325%-0.04
fachwerk220100%-0.03
vertigo21150%-0.06
mirage21150%-0.06
boulder1010%-0.09
poseidon1010%-0.02
overpass1010%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

82,570Lifetime kills
0.81K/D
5,982Matches
42.7%Match win rate
34.0%Headshot %
13.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
10,763MVPs
2,421Hours (in match)
9,804Bombs planted
1,664Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,889
MP712,498
AUG7,038
AWP5,224
Tec-92,525
MAC-101,871

Lifetime map wins

13,550nuke
7,055vertigo
6,257inferno
5,139train
2,559dust2
985lake
463office
445cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

200Matches
42%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
68.2ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke2959%0.9612.8
Ancient2631%0.7912.2
Anubis1436%0.839.9
Dust21331%0.6810.5
Vertigo1145%0.7510.2
Inferno922%0.7010.0
Mirage922%0.7911.2
Overpass838%1.0314.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

7.0%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
58.0%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
590msReaction time
22.1%T opening success
35.4%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
2.6%Flash assists
15.74HE damage / grenade
4.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 7.0455% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.1001% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5–13-0.0510%28 Aug
anubis13–11-0.025%27 Aug
anubis4–13-0.120%26 Aug
nuke11–13-0.122%26 Aug
inferno11–13-0.020%26 Aug
nuke5–13-0.069%26 Aug
boulder2–13-0.0912%26 Aug
ancient10–13-0.025%25 Aug
ancient7–13-0.077%25 Aug
nuke8–13-0.087%25 Aug
anubis6–13-0.099%24 Aug
fachwerk13–6-0.0412%24 Aug
fachwerk13–9-0.021%24 Aug
anubis13–10-0.017%24 Aug
cache5–13-0.0210%24 Aug
inferno13–9-0.006%24 Aug
nuke13–5-0.077%23 Aug
ancient13–9-0.087%23 Aug
poseidon5–9-0.0225%21 Aug
vertigo9–7-0.023%21 Aug
inferno9–4-0.063%21 Aug
nuke13–11-0.038%21 Aug
cache10–13-0.030%20 Aug
ancient13–11-0.073%20 Aug
dust26–13-0.046%20 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0118%19 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0311%19 Aug
nuke7–13-0.074%18 Aug
anubis13–90.0312%18 Aug
nuke13–16-0.062%17 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0213%17 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0910%16 Aug
cache9–13-0.0614%14 Aug
inferno13–100.033%14 Aug
inferno7–13-0.046%14 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.1111%14 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0111%14 Aug
cache13–50.0210%14 Aug
inferno7–9-0.024%14 Aug
ancient12–16-0.019%13 Aug
inferno1–13-0.034%13 Aug
inferno5–130.037%11 Aug
anubis16–120.069%11 Aug
anubis13–80.017%11 Aug
nuke13–7-0.017%10 Aug
ancient14–16-0.064%10 Aug
mirage11–13-0.088%10 Aug
inferno11–130.0010%10 Aug
nuke13–6-0.027%9 Aug
anubis13–16-0.077%8 Aug
nuke7–2-0.020%8 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0717%8 Aug
cache5–13-0.0410%8 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0913%8 Aug
cache6–13-0.045%5 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0610%5 Aug
nuke13–40.025%5 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0614%4 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0514%4 Aug
anubis5–13-0.050%4 Aug
ancient6–13-0.003%4 Aug
nuke13–100.0010%3 Aug
dust26–13-0.0316%3 Aug
ancient13–3-0.050%3 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0316%3 Aug
ancient13–9-0.028%3 Aug
inferno10–130.0010%3 Aug
nuke10–130.054%2 Aug
cache8–13-0.044%2 Aug
mirage13–9-0.050%2 Aug
dust213–7-0.0113%2 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0215%30 Jul
cache10–13-0.067%30 Jul
ancient1–13-0.070%30 Jul
anubis13–80.0310%30 Jul
cache7–13-0.078%30 Jul
overpass7–9-0.113%30 Jul
dust27–13-0.077%29 Jul
ancient13–9-0.018%29 Jul
cache13–10-0.0110%27 Jul
nuke13–11-0.026%27 Jul
anubis16–13-0.029%27 Jul
ancient1–13-0.056%27 Jul
nuke13–70.0612%27 Jul
nuke8–130.004%26 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0110%26 Jul
ancient6–13-0.054%25 Jul
inferno2–13-0.070%25 Jul
ancient14–16-0.014%25 Jul
nuke10–130.037%25 Jul
ancient10–130.004%25 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0412%25 Jul
anubis16–14-0.058%25 Jul
inferno13–80.016%24 Jul
anubis13–40.006%24 Jul
nuke10–13-0.034%24 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0611%24 Jul
nuke13–1-0.0113%24 Jul
cache13–6-0.049%24 Jul
ancient13–10-0.024%24 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →