MEXZ

MEXZ — CS2 Stats

NO76561197970250625[U:1:9984897]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,251Tracked matches32%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,835Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,430 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,763 -2,232 1 Apr – 10 May · 14 days played
14,89317,995peak 17,9951 Apr10 May
17,995Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,430Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-04-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,430
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 101 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate47.5%45.7%46.8%meets
Shot accuracy14.2%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.091.051.06above
Match win rate47.6%45.7%46.3%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 8 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMEXZFACEITLevel 7 · 1,430 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,430csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning64
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41–55–4Last 10041%Win rateLWWLTLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 6–13–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility3.7
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.4
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time600ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy26.5%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 26.5% → last ⅓ avg 26.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 14 Sept →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 17 Jul →
383msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 25 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 10 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
9–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 18% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC218–1338%-0.01
infernoA1810–856%-0.03
dust2D173–1418%-0.01
nukeD113–827%-0.03
anubisA106–460%0.02
ancientS96–367%-0.00
cacheD82–625%0.01
overpass—32–167%0.01
vertigo—20–20%-0.05
cache_b—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

157,021Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
6,864Matches
47.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
47.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
14.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
19,907MVPs
3,459Hours (in match)
7,131Bombs planted
2,072Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4749,884
AWP27,962
P2503,229
FAMAS3,155
Knife2,592

Lifetime map wins

18,997dust2
16,359inferno
6,385nuke
1,975train
1,617vertigo
1,598cbble
105office
58dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,141Matches
50%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
82.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11844%1.1016.6
Anubis10348%1.1417.5
Inferno7860%1.1817.2
Dust26349%1.1215.7
Ancient5545%1.2015.8
Nuke3057%1.1618.3
Cache1932%0.8815.2
Overpass1030%0.9417.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.9%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
583msReaction time
51.4%T opening success
51.3%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
2.6%Flash assists
8.12HE damage / grenade
3.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4468 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0634%27 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0324%26 Oct →
cache13–100.0424%26 Oct →
dust28–130.0123%26 Oct →
cache15–150.0622%22 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0716%21 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0428%17 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0324%15 Sept →
mirage13–80.0228%15 Sept →
mirage11–130.0033%14 Sept →
dust213–40.1429%14 Sept →
dust25–13-0.1032%11 Sept →
anubis13–60.0412%1 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0522%1 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0420%31 Aug →
mirage2–130.0323%28 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0623%25 Aug →
mirage9–130.0431%22 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0126%18 Aug →
dust212–16-0.0327%10 Aug →
mirage16–130.0119%10 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0032%18 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0327%17 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.1156%17 Jul →
inferno13–110.0327%17 Jul →
dust29–130.0422%16 Jul →
ancient13–100.0825%16 Jul →
inferno9–5-0.0225%16 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0133%16 Jul →
cache10–130.0415%16 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0129%15 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0236%15 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0929%12 Jul →
inferno2–9-0.1530%8 Jul →
inferno9–7-0.0216%6 Jul →
cache14–160.0021%27 May →
overpass13–90.0322%26 May →
inferno3–9-0.1544%16 May →
overpass5–9-0.0036%16 May →
inferno13–40.0011%10 May →
ancient13–1-0.0011%10 May →
cache13–9-0.0131%9 May →
anubis11–130.0227%7 May →
inferno13–5-0.0323%7 May →
mirage13–11-0.0028%30 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0740%25 Apr →
mirage11–130.0130%25 Apr →
dust215–15-0.0131%23 Apr →
mirage13–2-0.0022%23 Apr →
cache10–13-0.0523%23 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.1029%20 Apr →
mirage13–80.0125%15 Apr →
anubis13–70.0529%15 Apr →
inferno13–10.0630%15 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0715%15 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.0320%14 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.0519%14 Apr →
inferno8–130.0827%14 Apr →
vertigo5–13-0.0420%14 Apr →
mirage13–4-0.0131%13 Apr →
dust29–130.0227%13 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0553%11 Apr →
anubis13–100.0833%11 Apr →
overpass13–100.0139%10 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0231%9 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0123%8 Apr →
inferno13–11-0.0120%8 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0121%8 Apr →
ancient13–50.0215%8 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.0428%7 Apr →
anubis13–110.1020%6 Apr →
vertigo5–9-0.0733%4 Apr →
inferno2–9-0.1730%4 Apr →
nuke7–9-0.0514%4 Apr →
nuke8–80.0415%4 Apr →
nuke9–60.0119%4 Apr →
nuke7–9-0.1150%4 Apr →
nuke9–5-0.0619%4 Apr →
inferno4–9-0.1229%4 Apr →
nuke3–9-0.0620%4 Apr →
inferno9–20.0133%4 Apr →
inferno9–70.0319%4 Apr →
ancient11–130.0333%4 Apr →
ancient13–90.0033%4 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0417%4 Apr →
mirage11–130.0928%3 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0123%3 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0111%3 Apr →
dust213–60.0246%3 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0431%3 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0421%3 Apr →
cache_b13–70.0528%3 Apr →
nuke8–130.0029%2 Apr →
inferno6–90.0615%2 Apr →
ancient13–10-0.0725%2 Apr →
inferno13–7-0.0127%2 Apr →
dust213–110.0137%2 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0319%2 Apr →
nuke3–13-0.0350%2 Apr →
anubis16–130.0936%1 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.