reason.

reason. — CS2 Stats

DE76561197969939546[U:1:9673818]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,481Tracked matches52%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,994Hours in CS63Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,093Top 25% of 201,197 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40260 of 247983 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,691 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+465Premier CS Rating · 22,628 → 23,093

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,093 +1,927 25 Aug – 3 Oct · 21 days played
21,15023,369peak 23,36925 Aug3 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,691 +0 30 Aug – 20 Sept · 4 observations
1,6911,691peak 1,69130 Aug20 Sept
23,822Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,691Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-08-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,691
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 60 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 276 below peak (23,369)
  • +1,508 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,907 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches147——
Win rate54%——
K/D1.00——
Headshot %50%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,885), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate50.9%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy1.2%12.7%13.0%11.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.351.051.06above
Match win rate48.5%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGreason.FACEITLevel 7 · 1,691 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER23,093 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,691csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning51
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateWWWWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +4ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility4.3
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 49% on T to 30% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.1
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time533ms+33ms
first ⅓ avg 500ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 30 Aug →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · cache, 2 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · ancient, 30 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 30 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W4Current streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7ancientWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S3120–1165%-0.00
mirageB189–950%-0.01
ancientD186–1233%-0.01
infernoC156–940%0.00
cacheB84–450%-0.02
anubisS75–271%-0.01
nuke—31–233%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

80,033Lifetime kills
1.35K/D · Top 10% of Level 7 players
3,113Matches
48.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
50.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
1.2%Shot accuracy
7,463MVPs
1,834Hours (in match)
3,367Bombs planted
1,038Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4737,597
AWP2,397
MAC-101,958
MP91,814
FAMAS1,497

Lifetime map wins

8,155dust2
5,351inferno
2,909nuke
729train
684vertigo
601office
103cbble
100italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

717Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
77.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust224053%1.0615.2
Ancient14850%1.0615.9
Inferno11550%0.9614.5
Mirage7646%1.0414.1
Nuke4344%1.1716.5
Overpass4060%1.1414.5
Anubis2055%1.0916.8
Cache1921%0.7011.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
532msReaction time
49.2%T opening success
29.6%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
5.64HE damage / grenade
8.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 29.6153% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–30.0327%3 Oct →
dust213–90.0314%3 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0116%2 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0535%2 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0910%2 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0516%2 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0820%2 Oct →
inferno9–130.0516%1 Oct →
inferno5–130.0422%1 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0016%1 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0216%1 Oct →
cache13–60.0514%1 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0416%1 Oct →
dust213–70.0226%1 Oct →
mirage11–130.0314%1 Oct →
ancient13–40.1611%1 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0724%29 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0415%29 Sept →
mirage13–90.0124%29 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0131%29 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0324%29 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0120%28 Sept →
dust213–9-0.004%28 Sept →
cache13–30.0217%28 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0116%28 Sept →
cache16–12-0.0017%28 Sept →
mirage13–100.0119%28 Sept →
anubis13–50.048%27 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0117%27 Sept →
dust211–130.0120%27 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0221%27 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0421%27 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0224%27 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0213%26 Sept →
dust213–30.0420%26 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0810%26 Sept →
mirage13–70.0324%26 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0513%26 Sept →
inferno9–60.0113%24 Sept →
inferno5–90.0014%24 Sept →
inferno13–20.0319%24 Sept →
mirage12–160.0231%24 Sept →
inferno16–130.0726%24 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0020%23 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0611%23 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0019%23 Sept →
dust213–60.0022%23 Sept →
mirage13–110.0420%23 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0515%23 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0215%23 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0315%23 Sept →
ancient10–130.0318%23 Sept →
dust213–100.0211%23 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0411%22 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0117%22 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0516%22 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0318%21 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.075%19 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.039%19 Sept →
dust213–80.0225%19 Sept →
cache12–16-0.0119%19 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0311%19 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0313%17 Sept →
dust28–130.0326%17 Sept →
ancient19–17-0.0314%15 Sept →
dust213–100.0111%11 Sept →
ancient10–130.0625%11 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0417%11 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0718%8 Sept →
mirage13–110.0015%6 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0933%6 Sept →
dust29–130.1122%6 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0310%5 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0624%5 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.059%1 Sept →
inferno9–130.0315%1 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0512%1 Sept →
ancient13–100.0621%1 Sept →
dust213–90.0312%1 Sept →
cache9–13-0.048%31 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0020%31 Aug →
inferno8–130.0016%31 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0615%31 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0814%30 Aug →
dust213–10.1630%30 Aug →
inferno13–30.0116%30 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0917%30 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0623%30 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0417%28 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0117%28 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0512%28 Aug →
dust211–10-0.0216%28 Aug →
dust219–160.0015%26 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0422%25 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0418%25 Aug →
dust213–100.0323%25 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0310%25 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0228%25 Aug →
anubis13–70.0216%25 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0114%25 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.