quaZy — CS2 Stats

76561199461631256[U:1:1501365528]

1,766Tracked matches63%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,509Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12100 of 48775 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,240 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGquaZyFACEITLevel 6 · 1,240 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,509 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning58
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51445Last 10051%Win rateWWLWWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0
Aggression10.0
Utility2.8
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 42% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.8
Utility2.8
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time524ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms
Headshot accuracy26.1%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 28.4% → last ⅓ avg 26.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — mirage 13–3
133Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 61% over 23nukeWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC26111542%-0.00
dust2A2314961%0.00
mirageB158753%0.01
ancientB147750%0.03
nukeD93633%0.02
anubisD62433%0.01
cache440100%0.04
vertigo110100%0.03
poseidon1010%-0.12
overpass110100%0.21

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

155Matches
55%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
80.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24953%1.0515.0
Ancient3057%1.1116.4
Inferno2650%1.0015.3
Mirage1741%0.9515.1
Overpass1292%1.2015.8
Nuke956%1.2518.3
Train560%1.0414.6
Anubis560%1.0819.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.5%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
527msReaction time
41.5%T opening success
61.5%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
9.54HE damage / grenade
2.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4408 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo9–60.0332%30 Aug
nuke9–30.1830%30 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0218%30 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0713%30 Aug
anubis13–50.0422%30 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0230%29 Aug
mirage13–80.0046%29 Aug
inferno8–130.0338%29 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0627%29 Aug
inferno16–140.0419%29 Aug
nuke13–70.0017%29 Aug
ancient13–70.1221%29 Aug
inferno13–80.0441%28 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0139%28 Aug
nuke10–130.0137%28 Aug
inferno13–5-0.068%28 Aug
dust213–8-0.0139%28 Aug
cache13–60.0717%28 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1211%27 Aug
dust210–13-0.0528%26 Aug
dust213–6-0.0422%26 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0623%25 Aug
ancient13–50.0427%25 Aug
dust213–100.0131%25 Aug
dust213–110.0119%25 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0430%25 Aug
ancient8–130.0128%24 Aug
mirage13–110.0330%24 Aug
mirage13–30.2824%24 Aug
mirage13–80.0032%24 Aug
inferno13–110.0429%24 Aug
anubis6–130.0815%22 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0820%22 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0134%22 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0222%22 Aug
cache13–11-0.0222%21 Aug
dust26–130.0125%21 Aug
dust213–60.0226%21 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0224%21 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0837%21 Aug
ancient13–100.0123%21 Aug
dust216–130.0727%21 Aug
ancient9–130.0221%20 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0229%20 Aug
mirage13–80.0220%20 Aug
inferno13–80.0027%20 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0118%20 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0426%20 Aug
ancient5–130.0127%20 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0228%20 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0038%20 Aug
ancient15–150.0121%20 Aug
inferno13–110.0123%18 Aug
cache13–90.1225%18 Aug
dust29–13-0.0243%18 Aug
inferno6–90.1341%18 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0313%18 Aug
dust213–100.0425%18 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0424%18 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0620%18 Aug
dust29–13-0.0142%17 Aug
dust213–16-0.0118%17 Aug
nuke13–70.0622%17 Aug
dust213–60.0530%17 Aug
dust213–110.0938%17 Aug
dust213–70.0429%17 Aug
dust26–13-0.0527%16 Aug
dust213–7-0.0431%16 Aug
ancient13–60.0218%16 Aug
ancient9–130.0013%16 Aug
ancient16–120.0217%16 Aug
dust29–13-0.0125%16 Aug
nuke15–150.0224%15 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0250%15 Aug
dust26–13-0.0420%15 Aug
inferno9–130.0326%15 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0418%14 Aug
dust213–80.0431%14 Aug
dust213–110.0029%14 Aug
dust25–13-0.0248%13 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0217%13 Aug
dust213–8-0.0123%13 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0717%13 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0338%13 Aug
mirage13–90.0331%12 Aug
poseidon0–9-0.1267%12 Aug
overpass9–30.2119%12 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0521%10 Aug
inferno15–150.0434%10 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0325%10 Aug
cache16–14-0.0423%9 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0131%9 Aug
ancient13–60.1425%9 Aug
ancient13–80.0618%9 Aug
inferno9–70.1122%9 Aug
inferno9–50.1619%9 Aug
inferno1–9-0.2080%9 Aug
inferno13–60.1033%9 Aug
anubis7–130.0519%9 Aug
mirage13–80.1425%8 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →