danacc

danacc — CS2 Stats

YU76561197969230640[U:1:8964912]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

495Tracked matches53%Win rate2026Tracked since
227Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,487Blue band · top ~36.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (55 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,487 -1,484 26 Aug – 20 Sept · 21 days played
10,69514,971peak 14,97126 Aug20 Sept
14,971Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-08-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,484 below peak (14,971)
  • -1,484 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,513 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate56.0%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.081.021.03above
Match win rate48.4%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdanaccFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER13,487 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning68
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–52Last 10048%Win rateLWWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility6.6
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch3.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.8
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels6.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time559ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy23.9%+5.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–8 · anubis, 3 Sept →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · nuke, 4 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · cache, 12 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 11 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 35% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3113–1842%-0.01
mirageC238–1535%-0.01
ancientC167–944%0.01
anubisS118–373%0.03
infernoA106–460%-0.00
cacheS64–267%0.01
nuke—32–167%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 23). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

10,851Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
620Matches
48.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
56.0%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 5 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,333MVPs
227Hours (in match)
757Bombs planted
132Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-473,274
AWP887
MP7258
HE Grenade94
Knife79

Lifetime map wins

1,986dust2
874inferno
338nuke
26vertigo
10train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

84Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
81.8ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2744%1.0314.6
Dust22552%1.0815.8
Inferno1173%1.3816.4
Ancient944%1.0317.2
Anubis560%1.0015.6
Nuke450%0.8814.3
Cache250%1.4217.5
Vertigo10%0.254.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.2%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.1%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
554msReaction time
59.6%T opening success
53.2%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
13.05HE damage / grenade
8.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0611%20 Sept →
mirage13–50.0135%20 Sept →
dust213–100.0724%20 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0128%20 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0727%20 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0527%20 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0826%19 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0130%19 Sept →
dust213–20.0326%19 Sept →
anubis16–120.0424%19 Sept →
anubis13–100.0417%19 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0618%19 Sept →
inferno13–100.0119%19 Sept →
anubis5–130.0530%19 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0331%18 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0131%18 Sept →
inferno13–60.1033%18 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0427%18 Sept →
mirage13–90.0538%18 Sept →
mirage6–130.0327%17 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0317%17 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0015%17 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0920%17 Sept →
dust20–13-0.0929%17 Sept →
dust213–60.0118%17 Sept →
anubis13–40.0624%15 Sept →
anubis13–90.0318%15 Sept →
ancient13–110.0621%15 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0720%15 Sept →
cache13–110.0124%12 Sept →
dust213–110.1032%12 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.033%12 Sept →
ancient13–60.0921%12 Sept →
dust213–8-0.028%12 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0526%12 Sept →
mirage13–10.1121%11 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0423%9 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0316%9 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0222%8 Sept →
ancient13–110.0111%8 Sept →
cache13–70.0719%8 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0221%8 Sept →
ancient7–130.0613%8 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0223%8 Sept →
mirage10–130.0219%8 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0530%7 Sept →
anubis13–100.0330%7 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0718%7 Sept →
dust213–50.0338%7 Sept →
ancient14–160.0223%7 Sept →
dust27–130.0134%7 Sept →
dust211–130.0220%7 Sept →
cache13–110.0622%6 Sept →
dust25–130.0114%6 Sept →
ancient16–130.0018%5 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0124%5 Sept →
mirage13–100.0316%5 Sept →
cache13–80.0025%4 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0318%4 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0029%4 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.0442%4 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0223%4 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0125%4 Sept →
dust20–13-0.0628%4 Sept →
dust213–60.0424%4 Sept →
mirage8–130.0422%3 Sept →
anubis13–80.1314%3 Sept →
dust216–120.0123%3 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0314%3 Sept →
dust27–12-0.0618%3 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0127%2 Sept →
ancient14–160.0718%2 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0317%2 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0221%2 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0113%2 Sept →
inferno13–60.1121%1 Sept →
anubis10–130.0110%1 Sept →
mirage16–120.0417%1 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0123%1 Sept →
dust20–11-0.037%1 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0821%1 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0523%1 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0317%31 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0316%31 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0113%31 Aug →
mirage13–110.0526%28 Aug →
ancient13–90.0118%28 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0718%28 Aug →
dust213–20.1025%28 Aug →
ancient10–130.0413%28 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0617%27 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0811%27 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0520%27 Aug →
mirage10–130.0328%27 Aug →
ancient13–40.0432%27 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0421%27 Aug →
mirage13–50.0419%27 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0423%27 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0322%27 Aug →
nuke13–3-0.075%26 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.