nikk9

nikk9 — CS2 Stats

FI76561197968577517[U:1:8311789]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

868Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,005Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#82993 of 260007 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,384 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,005 +262 7 Sept – 28 Oct · 11 days played
19,74320,679peak 20,6797 Sept28 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,384 +0 31 Aug – 20 Sept · 3 observations
1,3841,384peak 1,38431 Aug20 Sept
20,754Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,384Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-08-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,384
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 147 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 674 below peak (20,679)
  • -674 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,995 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnikk9FACEITLevel 7 · 1,384 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,005 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,384csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning74
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–47–1Last 10052%Win rateWLWWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility7.0
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 73% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 73% on T to 50% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning7.4
Utility7.0
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels7.5
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time581ms+40ms
first ⅓ avg 541ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 20 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · inferno, 24 Sept →
383msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 5 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 19mirageWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2213–959%0.02
nukeA1912–763%0.02
infernoB189–950%0.01
cacheC125–742%0.02
anubisA127–558%0.01
dust2D93–633%0.01
mirageD72–529%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,401Matches
50%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
81.7ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5450%1.2015.9
Inferno4751%1.3115.9
Nuke4163%1.2515.2
Dust22737%1.0716.0
Anubis2348%1.1215.7
Overpass1937%1.2317.6
Cache1242%1.2217.8
Mirage850%0.9915.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
12.2°Preaim
578msReaction time
73.3%T opening success
50.0%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
10.9%Flash assists
8.94HE damage / grenade
14.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.2164° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–8-0.0030%4 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0217%4 Nov →
ancient13–100.0321%2 Nov →
cache13–90.0528%2 Nov →
mirage7–13-0.0221%28 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0225%28 Oct →
anubis11–130.0217%28 Oct →
nuke13–160.0321%28 Oct →
cache10–130.0521%26 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0211%23 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0128%23 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0311%23 Oct →
dust213–70.0310%23 Oct →
cache8–130.0415%23 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0210%23 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0228%21 Oct →
cache12–120.0520%21 Oct →
cache13–80.0718%19 Oct →
dust211–130.0732%13 Oct →
anubis13–110.0319%13 Oct →
anubis13–90.0020%12 Oct →
ancient13–60.0610%10 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0420%10 Oct →
ancient13–40.1421%9 Oct →
dust26–130.0820%9 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0212%9 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0622%9 Oct →
inferno9–130.0528%9 Oct →
nuke13–90.0913%7 Oct →
inferno8–130.0230%7 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0220%7 Oct →
cache13–100.0530%6 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0021%6 Oct →
nuke13–30.0314%6 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0418%5 Oct →
ancient14–160.0120%5 Oct →
inferno13–80.0533%4 Oct →
nuke13–90.0519%4 Oct →
mirage6–130.0024%4 Oct →
ancient13–60.0220%1 Oct →
ancient13–100.0130%30 Sept →
mirage7–130.0223%30 Sept →
anubis13–50.0024%30 Sept →
inferno13–80.0330%28 Sept →
ancient19–160.0320%28 Sept →
ancient8–130.0714%27 Sept →
anubis13–110.0521%27 Sept →
inferno13–80.0550%24 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0717%23 Sept →
dust213–110.0229%23 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.050%23 Sept →
nuke13–60.0523%23 Sept →
inferno7–130.0123%21 Sept →
ancient11–130.0921%20 Sept →
nuke13–80.0530%20 Sept →
ancient10–130.0014%20 Sept →
ancient13–60.0415%20 Sept →
nuke13–50.1415%20 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0524%20 Sept →
mirage9–130.0120%19 Sept →
inferno4–130.0217%19 Sept →
ancient13–10.0720%19 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0619%19 Sept →
cache11–130.0425%17 Sept →
mirage13–100.0017%17 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0818%17 Sept →
cache10–13-0.1010%16 Sept →
nuke13–80.0632%16 Sept →
anubis11–130.0316%16 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0411%16 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0123%16 Sept →
inferno13–90.0826%14 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0216%14 Sept →
nuke4–130.0214%13 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0212%13 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0415%10 Sept →
cache13–10.0729%10 Sept →
nuke9–130.0225%10 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0235%10 Sept →
ancient13–110.0316%10 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0415%9 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0119%7 Sept →
anubis13–40.0425%7 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0126%6 Sept →
ancient13–40.0218%2 Sept →
anubis13–60.0315%2 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0322%30 Aug →
nuke13–50.1225%30 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0030%24 Aug →
inferno13–70.0012%23 Aug →
vertigo13–20.1033%15 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0116%15 Aug →
inferno13–100.0526%15 Aug →
ancient11–130.0014%15 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0419%15 Aug →
nuke19–170.0521%10 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0220%9 Aug →
anubis13–50.0625%9 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0716%8 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0318%8 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.