majesTic

majesTic — CS2 Stats

76561197968445466[U:1:8179738]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,665Tracked matches46%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,443Blue band · top ~47.3% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,443 -3,556 4 Apr – 27 Oct · 28 days played
10,72615,777peak 15,7774 Apr27 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,168 +0 30 Aug – 13 Sept · 3 observations
1,1681,168peak 1,16830 Aug13 Sept
15,777Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,168Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-04-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,168
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 33 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,334 below peak (15,777)
  • +379 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,557 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmajesTicPREMIER11,443 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,168csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning54
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–52–3Last 10045%Win rateLWLWWTLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · +31ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 722ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 673ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility5.3
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.4
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time633ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy10.9%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 12.3% → last ⅓ avg 10.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 14 May →
24%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · vertigo, 8 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · nuke, 6 May →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 20mirageWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC229–1341%-0.00
nukeS2014–670%0.01
ancientC167–944%0.02
infernoC145–936%0.01
cacheB126–650%0.01
mirageD81–713%-0.03
vertigoD72–529%0.02
train—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

120Matches
52%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
79.0ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke3754%1.0715.6
Anubis2654%1.4817.1
Inferno1937%1.3316.4
Ancient1457%1.0815.2
Vertigo1450%1.3315.6
Mirage956%0.9111.4
Dust21100%1.0715.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.1%Headshot accuracy
41.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
642msReaction time
37.0%T opening success
49.3%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
11.2%Flash assists
10.37HE damage / grenade
2.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.1121% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.7007 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.0066% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.087%27 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0316%21 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0811%21 Oct →
cache5–30.1110%21 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0814%15 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.0123%15 Oct →
cache10–130.0311%15 Oct →
anubis13–50.0514%12 Oct →
anubis13–60.0511%8 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.048%8 Oct →
ancient13–80.089%8 Oct →
anubis0–13-0.050%8 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.016%7 Oct →
nuke13–00.0414%7 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0316%6 Oct →
vertigo3–13-0.0511%6 Oct →
mirage11–130.019%30 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.016%28 Sept →
vertigo5–130.058%23 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0520%18 Sept →
anubis10–130.027%18 Sept →
nuke13–110.049%18 Sept →
nuke15–150.0411%17 Sept →
ancient13–20.0416%17 Sept →
nuke9–130.0413%10 Sept →
inferno13–70.0114%10 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.044%9 Sept →
cache13–60.0412%9 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0410%8 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.029%8 Sept →
ancient7–130.036%4 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0111%1 Sept →
inferno16–140.0315%27 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0414%27 Aug →
anubis13–80.017%26 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.054%19 Aug →
nuke13–10.058%19 Aug →
anubis13–50.0511%19 Aug →
nuke13–70.0411%19 Aug →
train13–6-0.022%14 Aug →
anubis13–20.017%5 Aug →
ancient12–160.0414%4 Aug →
ancient13–40.1018%4 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.018%4 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.026%4 Aug →
ancient13–110.0011%14 Jul →
ancient8–130.0112%14 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.059%10 Jul →
vertigo13–11-0.0224%8 Jul →
cache8–130.0319%6 Jul →
anubis13–90.0110%6 Jul →
anubis10–130.038%2 Jul →
inferno13–80.0121%1 Jul →
ancient6–130.0015%29 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.019%29 Jun →
ancient2–130.017%29 Jun →
mirage10–130.0514%27 Jun →
ancient13–110.0615%25 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0115%22 Jun →
mirage2–13-0.109%22 Jun →
nuke13–30.0611%17 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.068%17 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0219%17 Jun →
anubis7–130.0318%17 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0222%15 Jun →
nuke13–30.058%15 Jun →
nuke13–70.0323%9 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.0316%9 Jun →
ancient13–30.0211%9 Jun →
vertigo8–130.0314%8 Jun →
vertigo11–130.0413%8 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.048%28 May →
inferno14–160.0615%27 May →
anubis11–130.0312%22 May →
nuke7–2-0.020%22 May →
cache13–20.1311%14 May →
ancient6–13-0.067%14 May →
nuke11–70.059%14 May →
inferno9–130.0018%12 May →
cache13–10-0.0316%12 May →
nuke13–8-0.017%6 May →
cache13–8-0.0417%6 May →
nuke13–3-0.009%6 May →
anubis13–10-0.0514%6 May →
cache2–13-0.0617%1 May →
cache7–13-0.0312%29 Apr →
cache5–13-0.064%29 Apr →
cache7–40.0513%29 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0114%28 Apr →
inferno13–60.0218%28 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.049%23 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0219%23 Apr →
anubis13–80.0223%22 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0010%22 Apr →
ancient13–70.0018%21 Apr →
vertigo12–100.0013%20 Apr →
inferno10–130.0910%8 Apr →
nuke13–11-0.019%6 Apr →
inferno13–80.009%4 Apr →
anubis9–13-0.0314%4 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.