BoSSi

BoSSi — CS2 Stats

76561197968313131[U:1:8047403]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

808Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,427Top 25% of 201,820 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#48698 of 249540 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,584 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,427 -2,031 27 Jun – 30 Sept · 24 days played
21,47924,720peak 24,72027 Jun30 Sept
24,838Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,584Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-06-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,584
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 167 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,293 below peak (24,720)
  • -808 over 30 days · declining
  • -2,293 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,573 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBoSSiFACEITLevel 9 · 1,584 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,427 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,584csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning56
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateLLWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −6.1pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 485ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility5.3
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time518ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 518ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%−4.5%
first ⅓ avg 28.7% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 8–8 · nuke, 29 Jun →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · anubis, 31 Jul →
352msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 19 Jul →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 30 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 25cacheWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2513–1252%-0.01
infernoA2514–1156%0.02
nukeB1910–953%0.00
dust2B168–850%-0.00
cacheD72–529%-0.02
anubisD62–433%-0.01
mirage—21–150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

197Matches
58%Win rate
1.38Avg K/D
79.7ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4757%1.3217.8
Inferno4564%1.3414.8
Nuke3060%1.2515.8
Dust21759%1.3618.5
Mirage1553%1.2517.7
Anubis956%1.1916.2
Cache30%0.639.7
Train30%0.7312.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.1%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
511msReaction time
30.8%T opening success
46.8%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
10.79HE damage / grenade
8.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4169 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.8425% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient3–130.0421%30 Sept →
inferno8–130.0214%29 Sept →
ancient16–140.0130%22 Sept →
inferno13–30.0825%22 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0218%22 Sept →
inferno11–130.0515%22 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0430%20 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0313%20 Sept →
nuke13–30.0221%20 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0123%18 Sept →
ancient13–70.0117%17 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0233%14 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0029%14 Sept →
inferno13–40.0931%14 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0316%13 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0221%13 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0630%27 Aug →
inferno13–90.0626%21 Aug →
nuke13–80.0038%18 Aug →
dust213–40.0431%12 Aug →
dust22–130.0036%12 Aug →
inferno13–80.0330%12 Aug →
ancient13–90.0320%2 Aug →
inferno13–90.0713%2 Aug →
inferno10–130.0121%2 Aug →
ancient19–16-0.0316%31 Jul →
anubis5–130.0244%31 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0226%31 Jul →
inferno13–100.0121%31 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0123%31 Jul →
ancient5–130.0133%31 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0811%31 Jul →
nuke13–60.0723%30 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0420%30 Jul →
cache16–140.0122%30 Jul →
inferno13–20.0936%30 Jul →
inferno14–16-0.0334%30 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0412%29 Jul →
dust213–80.0038%29 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0722%29 Jul →
nuke16–14-0.0333%28 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0214%27 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0628%27 Jul →
nuke11–130.0420%27 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0411%27 Jul →
ancient16–13-0.0515%27 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.0616%24 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0320%24 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0623%24 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0020%23 Jul →
nuke13–50.0723%23 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0321%23 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0118%23 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0128%23 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.1217%23 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0035%23 Jul →
inferno9–130.0036%22 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0113%22 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0123%21 Jul →
anubis13–110.0525%21 Jul →
dust210–130.0038%21 Jul →
inferno13–100.0933%20 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0424%20 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0112%20 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.093%20 Jul →
anubis7–130.0024%19 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0721%19 Jul →
inferno13–70.0334%19 Jul →
ancient13–30.0924%19 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0223%19 Jul →
dust26–130.0438%19 Jul →
dust216–140.0121%19 Jul →
inferno13–110.0325%19 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0225%19 Jul →
dust213–80.0130%18 Jul →
inferno16–120.0743%17 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0515%17 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0129%17 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0141%17 Jul →
nuke13–100.0226%15 Jul →
ancient13–90.0230%15 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0233%15 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0025%13 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0120%13 Jul →
inferno13–80.0828%13 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0024%13 Jul →
inferno11–130.0526%13 Jul →
nuke16–130.0225%12 Jul →
cache4–130.0143%11 Jul →
inferno4–9-0.0835%7 Jul →
dust24–130.0534%5 Jul →
ancient6–130.0128%5 Jul →
ancient13–16-0.0624%5 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0230%2 Jul →
ancient16–130.0529%2 Jul →
nuke8–80.1114%29 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0434%27 Jun →
ancient13–6-0.0127%27 Jun →
nuke13–90.0640%27 Jun →
ancient13–60.0225%27 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.