relaxantt1

relaxantt1 — CS2 Stats

76561197967265263[U:1:6999535]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,806Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,413Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,000Top 50% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#77152 of 239353 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,525 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 24 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,000 -3,344 24 Jul19 Sept · 35 days played
20,00023,710peak 23,71024 Jul19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,525 +0 31 Aug7 Sept · 4 observations
1,5251,525peak 1,52531 Aug7 Sept
24,093Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,525Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-07-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,525
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 6 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,710 below peak (23,710)
  • -2,937 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,086), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate50.8%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy9.3%13.0%13.2%3.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.741.061.070.33 short
Match win rate37.2%46.3%46.9%9.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrelaxantt1FACEITLevel 8 · 1,525 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,525csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning61
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41554Last 10041%Win rateLLWWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · +60ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility3.1
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch4.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning6.1
Utility3.1
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time514ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 525ms → last ⅓ avg 514ms
Headshot accuracy12.2%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 12.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–11 · nuke, 12 Aug
33%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · inferno, 25 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · inferno, 28 Aug
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 16 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 50% over 14anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC28111739%-0.00
infernoC27121544%0.01
cacheC145936%0.01
ancientB147750%0.01
anubisD92722%-0.01
dust2C52340%0.03
mirage32167%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

210,305Lifetime kills
0.74K/D
7,687Matches
37.2%Match win rate
50.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
9.3%Shot accuracy
14,790MVPs
4,339Hours (in match)
6,083Bombs planted
3,081Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4792,396
AWP11,674
FAMAS5,063
MAC-103,731
Tec-93,658

Lifetime map wins

11,743nuke
9,987inferno
5,849dust2
4,529vertigo
3,151train
177lake
108cbble
48office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

386Matches
52%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
83.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno9355%1.1115.5
Nuke9159%1.0915.8
Dust25042%0.9714.8
Ancient3653%1.0216.0
Overpass2654%1.3018.3
Anubis2232%1.0216.8
Mirage2035%0.8014.2
Vertigo1979%1.1014.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.1%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
72.7%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
520msReaction time
45.6%T opening success
41.1%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
11.58HE damage / grenade
1.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.071% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3502 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–130.058%19 Sept
inferno7–130.0319%19 Sept
nuke13–20.0811%16 Sept
inferno13–70.0411%16 Sept
cache9–130.0111%16 Sept
nuke11–130.057%16 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0019%15 Sept
nuke10–13-0.008%15 Sept
inferno11–130.0010%13 Sept
inferno13–6-0.075%10 Sept
mirage13–80.017%8 Sept
inferno13–100.059%8 Sept
cache9–130.0519%7 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0712%7 Sept
inferno13–60.0112%7 Sept
mirage13–110.029%5 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0315%5 Sept
inferno9–130.0421%5 Sept
nuke13–80.089%1 Sept
cache17–190.037%31 Aug
inferno7–130.0013%30 Aug
nuke5–13-0.029%30 Aug
cache13–16-0.0213%29 Aug
anubis4–130.0124%29 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0514%28 Aug
inferno13–40.007%28 Aug
cache13–4-0.0513%28 Aug
inferno16–130.1116%28 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0410%25 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0113%25 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0317%24 Aug
inferno13–5-0.019%24 Aug
inferno14–160.0012%22 Aug
inferno10–130.0820%22 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0511%22 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0313%22 Aug
nuke13–50.0120%22 Aug
nuke13–80.0713%20 Aug
inferno3–13-0.030%20 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0112%20 Aug
cache8–130.0015%19 Aug
inferno5–130.0814%19 Aug
ancient13–90.0512%18 Aug
ancient4–3-0.014%18 Aug
cache7–130.0211%18 Aug
nuke13–100.0310%16 Aug
nuke11–130.0318%16 Aug
ancient13–11-0.068%13 Aug
inferno13–110.0115%13 Aug
ancient13–11-0.019%13 Aug
nuke13–110.1111%12 Aug
anubis16–120.0512%10 Aug
cache10–13-0.0114%9 Aug
nuke15–150.0115%9 Aug
ancient13–70.0323%9 Aug
inferno13–7-0.028%9 Aug
nuke8–13-0.034%9 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0812%7 Aug
dust27–130.0521%6 Aug
nuke8–13-0.073%6 Aug
ancient9–130.0212%6 Aug
cache12–16-0.049%5 Aug
dust213–60.0416%5 Aug
ancient6–130.0111%4 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0120%3 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0019%3 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0413%3 Aug
cache13–100.0727%3 Aug
inferno13–60.0717%2 Aug
anubis6–130.027%30 Jul
inferno4–13-0.006%30 Jul
inferno9–130.0511%30 Jul
nuke13–110.0111%30 Jul
ancient13–90.1115%30 Jul
dust24–130.0124%30 Jul
inferno13–100.0115%28 Jul
nuke13–30.0115%28 Jul
anubis8–13-0.064%28 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0910%28 Jul
dust213–70.0318%28 Jul
inferno13–6-0.005%27 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0615%27 Jul
cache15–150.0310%27 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0633%25 Jul
ancient13–40.0818%25 Jul
cache13–90.039%25 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0914%25 Jul
cache13–110.0415%25 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0523%25 Jul
inferno7–13-0.068%25 Jul
dust215–150.0215%25 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0318%25 Jul
nuke15–150.0512%24 Jul
nuke13–160.0117%24 Jul
cache13–7-0.0410%24 Jul
anubis13–100.0815%24 Jul
ancient6–13-0.037%24 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0413%24 Jul
nuke13–30.039%24 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0015%24 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →