JolteN — CS2 Stats

76561197967194588[U:1:6928860]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,431Tracked matches31%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.0 Developing

Premier CS Rating12,534Blue band · top ~41.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#28384 of 41884 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47

Positioning55

Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–54–2Last 10044%Win rateLWWWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.7

Aggression6.1

Utility6.8

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch5.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7

Positioning5.5

Utility6.8

Mechanics3.2

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time575ms−101ms

first ⅓ avg 675ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms

Headshot accuracy16.3%+2.0%

first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — cache 13–5

13–2Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 15dust2Weakest map · 20% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	A	23	13–10	57%	-0.00
dust2	D	15	3–12	20%	-0.03
mirage	A	15	9–6	60%	-0.02
inferno	D	14	4–10	29%	-0.02
ancient	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.01
cache	C	12	5–7	42%	0.00
anubis	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

118Matches

53%Win rate

0.94Avg K/D

75.3ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	26	69%	1.14	15.2
Mirage	25	56%	0.89	14.0
Inferno	15	33%	1.04	14.9
Vertigo	13	54%	0.84	11.1
Anubis	10	30%	0.90	12.2
Ancient	10	50%	0.81	13.3
Dust2	9	33%	0.80	14.2
Overpass	3	100%	1.30	15.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy

32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.3%Spray accuracy

64.4%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

580msReaction time

32.9%T opening success

43.5%CT opening success

0.73Enemies flashed / flash

4.6%Flash assists

10.94HE damage / grenade

11.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.9113% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	6–13	-0.01	17%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	15%	30 Aug →
nuke	12–5	-0.04	8%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.01	16%	30 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.02	18%	29 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	17%	28 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	12%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	13%	28 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.05	19%	27 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	25%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.05	21%	27 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.10	20%	25 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.03	19%	25 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	19%	25 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.08	13%	24 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	21%	24 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	10%	24 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.08	15%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.04	5%	23 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.01	16%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	17%	23 Aug →
nuke	12–16	0.07	10%	23 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.00	13%	21 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.03	9%	21 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	20%	21 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.04	26%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	33%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.05	14%	20 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	0%	16 Aug →
nuke	2–13	0.01	14%	16 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	23%	16 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	27%	15 Aug →
ancient	16–12	0.01	12%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.02	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	13%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	17%	14 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	8%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	15%	13 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.04	21%	13 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	7%	13 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	6%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.02	10%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.05	14%	12 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.03	21%	11 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.01	17%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.10	16%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	20%	10 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	21%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	11%	10 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.01	13%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.03	17%	10 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	12%	10 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.03	9%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.00	10%	9 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	7%	9 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.10	7%	9 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	15%	9 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.05	9%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	6%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	11%	8 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	12%	7 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.13	26%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.08	6%	7 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	16%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	7%	7 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	6%	7 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	6%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	13%	7 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	24%	7 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	9%	7 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.06	12%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	4%	6 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.00	15%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.08	16%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	15%	6 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	15%	6 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.08	11%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	14%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.06	15%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	15%	2 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.03	13%	2 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	14%	30 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.03	16%	29 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.06	12%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	17%	29 Jul →
nuke	9–4	-0.02	17%	28 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	17%	28 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.06	15%	28 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	15%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.04	14%	28 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	10%	28 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.00	7%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.09	22%	27 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.02	14%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.02	24%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.05	19%	27 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.07	16%	27 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.01	19%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.00	10%	27 Jul →