n1ce ☂

n1ce ☂ — CS2 Stats

AT76561197966970685[U:1:6704957]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,187Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,328Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,289Top 25% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40237 of 258955 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,962 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,289 -1,754 17 May – 22 Oct · 23 days played
21,68025,043peak 25,04317 May22 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,962 +0 31 Aug – 27 Sept · 4 observations
1,9621,962peak 1,96231 Aug27 Sept
25,398Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,962Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-05-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,962
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 39 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,754 below peak (25,043)
  • +1,215 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,711 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches2539−14
Win rate48%41%+7pp
K/D0.960.93+0.02
Headshot %48%47%+1pp

Measured 27 Sep 2026 → 31 Oct 2026; previous 31 Aug 2026 → 27 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate46.3%46.8%48.2%1.9% short
Shot accuracy17.6%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.071.061.07meets
Match win rate49.9%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGn1ce ☂FACEITLevel 8 · 1,962 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,289 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,962csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning58
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40–57–3Last 10040%Win rateLWWTLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · +29ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility3.3
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.8
Utility3.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time510ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 510ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%−3.9%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 22 Oct →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · inferno, 15 Jun →
367msFastest reaction time · 16–12 · dust2, 17 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 22 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 59% over 17ancientWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D186–1233%-0.01
infernoC187–1139%-0.00
anubisC176–1135%-0.00
cacheA1710–759%0.00
ancientD144–1029%-0.01
mirageC83–538%0.00
nukeA74–357%0.01
overpass—10–10%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

190,865Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
7,790Matches
49.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
46.3%Headshot %
17.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
20,953MVPs
3,924Hours (in match)
9,890Bombs planted
2,160Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4756,714
AWP34,020
P2506,089
SSG 082,908
Knife2,812
MAC-102,364

Lifetime map wins

16,820inferno
12,966dust2
9,234nuke
4,948train
2,600cbble
665vertigo
220aztec
195office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,244Matches
52%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
64.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke9557%0.9214.2
Anubis9252%1.1415.2
Inferno8855%0.9411.9
Dust24745%0.8312.5
Ancient3129%0.7812.6
Train3063%0.9314.1
Mirage2733%0.8312.0
Overpass2236%1.1115.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.1%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
519msReaction time
48.4%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.30Enemies flashed / flash
1.4%Flash assists
10.36HE damage / grenade
5.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.299 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0715%22 Oct →
dust213–10.1441%22 Oct →
inferno13–90.0522%22 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0317%22 Oct →
mirage10–130.0132%22 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.059%17 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0219%17 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0213%17 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0515%17 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0211%16 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0123%16 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0127%16 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0428%16 Oct →
inferno15–150.0125%11 Oct →
mirage2–00.000%11 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0312%11 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0521%11 Oct →
mirage8–130.0426%11 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0830%11 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0217%8 Oct →
cache14–160.0326%8 Oct →
cache13–20.0832%8 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0423%1 Oct →
anubis13–70.0221%1 Oct →
anubis13–10.0716%1 Oct →
inferno11–130.0110%23 Sept →
dust213–110.0230%23 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0524%23 Sept →
nuke13–50.0621%22 Sept →
cache13–0-0.0129%22 Sept →
dust216–19-0.0218%20 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0216%20 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0411%20 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0228%17 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0312%17 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0420%17 Sept →
dust216–120.0117%17 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0419%10 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.067%10 Sept →
nuke16–130.0317%10 Sept →
anubis10–130.0116%10 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0424%7 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0745%7 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0329%7 Sept →
ancient9–130.0323%7 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0229%7 Sept →
cache13–60.0524%2 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0224%2 Sept →
inferno13–90.0414%2 Sept →
cache13–60.0831%1 Sept →
inferno13–10.0733%1 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0422%1 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0360%1 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0318%26 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0523%26 Aug →
inferno14–16-0.0018%24 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0110%24 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.029%24 Aug →
inferno8–130.0148%11 Aug →
nuke13–100.0136%11 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0318%10 Aug →
ancient13–60.0028%10 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0114%10 Aug →
inferno13–60.0637%10 Aug →
cache13–60.0726%10 Aug →
ancient11–130.0619%28 Jul →
anubis13–70.008%28 Jul →
nuke13–20.0917%28 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0613%24 Jul →
anubis13–10.1025%24 Jul →
cache13–60.0131%24 Jul →
anubis12–160.0019%22 Jul →
mirage13–80.0632%22 Jul →
cache16–13-0.0223%18 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.029%17 Jul →
inferno16–13-0.0025%6 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0640%6 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0432%6 Jul →
dust211–130.0329%1 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0121%1 Jul →
inferno6–130.0221%1 Jul →
cache3–130.0221%1 Jul →
nuke12–16-0.0822%24 Jun →
mirage13–40.0811%24 Jun →
dust21–130.0027%15 Jun →
inferno0–13-0.00100%15 Jun →
inferno1–13-0.1325%15 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0113%10 Jun →
ancient13–60.0125%10 Jun →
dust210–130.0129%5 Jun →
ancient13–60.0213%5 Jun →
inferno13–90.0516%5 Jun →
ancient14–16-0.0613%5 Jun →
overpass1–13-0.0833%18 May →
mirage5–13-0.0523%18 May →
inferno2–13-0.0233%18 May →
anubis4–13-0.0013%18 May →
dust213–110.0023%18 May →
ancient11–13-0.0122%17 May →
cache13–10-0.0711%17 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.