SilverFlame

SilverFlame — CS2 Stats

DK76561197966926254[U:1:6660526]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,153Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,999Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating14,894Blue band · top ~29% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (30 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,894 -401 14 Aug – 26 Sept · 5 days played
14,89415,295peak 15,29514 Aug26 Sept
15,642Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-08-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 401 below peak (15,295)
  • -391 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 106 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate38.6%42.7%43.8%5.1% short
Shot accuracy12.3%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.180.991.02above
Match win rate44.3%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSilverFlameFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,894 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning67
Utility79

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–52–1Last 10047%Win rateWLLWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.4 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility7.9
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch0.8

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.82 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 79 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning6.7
Utility7.9
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time558ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy13.5%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–1 · poseidon, 15 Aug →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · poseidon, 15 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 27 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 17 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

poseidonBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 27% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2712–1544%0.02
anubisD226–1627%-0.01
infernoB2010–1050%0.01
ancientA148–657%0.02
mirageD62–433%-0.01
poseidonS54–180%0.05
debrisS54–180%0.06
cache—11–0100%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,260Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
3,899Matches
44.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
38.6%Headshot %
12.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
9,529MVPs
1,622Hours (in match)
6,787Bombs planted
1,157Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,418
AWP9,853
UMP-453,833
MP92,311
MAC-102,201
FAMAS2,065
SG 5531,973

Lifetime map wins

6,658inferno
4,886nuke
4,828vertigo
3,403dust2
985train
496cbble
40lake
28office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

221Matches
47%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
78.8ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke5761%1.6116.0
Anubis4434%0.9614.9
Inferno3847%1.3114.9
Ancient3253%1.2215.4
Mirage1513%0.8812.5
Overpass617%0.7513.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
78.8%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
564msReaction time
51.3%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.82Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
12.46HE damage / grenade
10.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.3525% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–60.0326%24 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0410%24 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0116%24 Oct →
ancient13–40.0313%23 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.119%23 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0214%23 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0418%20 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0110%20 Oct →
nuke13–20.1313%19 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0813%19 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0020%19 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0132%18 Oct →
inferno6–130.0219%18 Oct →
nuke13–50.014%16 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.019%16 Oct →
inferno13–160.0117%16 Oct →
anubis1–13-0.105%14 Oct →
inferno13–20.0818%14 Oct →
ancient13–80.025%14 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.006%13 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.0310%11 Oct →
nuke13–80.0610%11 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.063%11 Oct →
poseidon9–60.0221%8 Oct →
nuke7–130.0318%8 Oct →
anubis4–130.0215%8 Oct →
nuke9–130.0520%1 Oct →
inferno13–40.0110%1 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.007%1 Oct →
nuke13–50.0611%28 Sept →
nuke13–10.0624%28 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0510%28 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0811%27 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0114%27 Sept →
ancient13–70.0114%27 Sept →
anubis13–160.0212%26 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0611%26 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.008%26 Sept →
anubis11–130.0018%25 Sept →
nuke13–50.1126%25 Sept →
nuke13–90.0217%25 Sept →
inferno16–140.0218%20 Sept →
nuke13–10.1124%20 Sept →
anubis16–130.0510%20 Sept →
anubis8–130.0119%17 Sept →
anubis13–60.0311%17 Sept →
inferno7–130.0015%13 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0411%13 Sept →
ancient13–30.0821%13 Sept →
inferno16–130.0111%11 Sept →
ancient10–130.0313%11 Sept →
ancient8–130.0311%10 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0216%10 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0018%10 Sept →
inferno13–40.0711%8 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0011%7 Sept →
mirage10–130.014%7 Sept →
inferno13–10.048%7 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.004%6 Sept →
ancient6–130.0110%6 Sept →
anubis13–80.0414%6 Sept →
inferno7–130.019%5 Sept →
ancient13–70.0114%5 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0010%5 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0113%3 Sept →
mirage13–30.0213%3 Sept →
inferno13–90.039%3 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0312%2 Sept →
ancient13–80.085%2 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.002%2 Sept →
nuke16–120.0615%30 Aug →
nuke14–160.019%30 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0020%30 Aug →
nuke7–130.0313%28 Aug →
nuke10–130.039%28 Aug →
ancient13–30.0020%28 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0119%27 Aug →
ancient13–110.077%27 Aug →
mirage13–110.0213%27 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0419%27 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0715%27 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0215%23 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.009%23 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0319%23 Aug →
nuke13–90.0719%18 Aug →
anubis16–120.0311%17 Aug →
inferno13–00.1216%17 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0410%17 Aug →
debris9–30.0916%16 Aug →
poseidon9–7-0.0613%16 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0912%16 Aug →
nuke14–160.018%16 Aug →
debris9–70.0113%15 Aug →
debris6–90.0124%15 Aug →
poseidon9–60.0614%15 Aug →
debris9–40.0825%15 Aug →
poseidon8–80.0112%15 Aug →
debris9–30.0910%15 Aug →
poseidon9–10.2343%15 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0312%14 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.