BskooL

BskooL — CS2 Stats

US76561197966878338[U:1:6612610]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,826Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,658Purple band · top ~13.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#91087 of 225340 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,090 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 29 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,658 +880 6 May16 Sept · 15 days played
16,47618,658peak 18,6586 May16 Sept
18,658Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,090Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-04-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,090
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 111 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,658
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,342 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBskooLFACEITLevel 4 · 1,090 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,658 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,090csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning35
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateWWLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · −37ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 654ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 672ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility5.4
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 683ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning3.5
Utility5.4
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time673ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 673ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 20 May
57%Best headshot accuracy · 1–9 · mirage, 8 May
484msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · dust2, 7 Aug
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 9 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
115In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 62% over 29infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A29181162%-0.01
mirageA2112957%0.00
ancientB147750%0.00
cacheB147750%-0.00
infernoD71614%-0.05
anubisD72529%-0.03
nukeD61517%-0.03
vertigo110100%-0.01
overpass1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

407Matches
45%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
70.7ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6149%1.1014.4
Dust25252%1.0013.6
Ancient3735%1.1515.3
Nuke2129%0.9313.8
Cache1443%1.0214.9
Inferno1354%1.0914.2
Vertigo1060%0.8210.9
Overpass888%0.9016.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
87.1%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
683msReaction time
9.9%T opening success
18.5%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
8.29HE damage / grenade
17.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 9.9113% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–70.0120%16 Sept
ancient13–60.0812%16 Sept
inferno4–130.0117%16 Sept
inferno2–9-0.165%12 Sept
inferno9–13-0.046%30 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0622%30 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0415%27 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.0116%27 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0121%26 Aug
dust213–20.1029%23 Aug
dust215–15-0.1013%8 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0415%8 Aug
mirage11–130.0113%7 Aug
dust213–70.0312%7 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0521%7 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0824%6 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0312%25 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0220%25 Jul
cache13–11-0.0527%25 Jul
dust216–130.0136%25 Jul
dust213–60.0123%24 Jul
cache7–13-0.049%9 Jul
mirage5–130.0218%9 Jul
ancient13–10.1117%9 Jul
dust213–4-0.0419%4 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0619%2 Jul
dust213–9-0.0524%2 Jul
nuke1–13-0.036%2 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0813%30 Jun
dust21–13-0.1124%30 Jun
mirage13–50.009%30 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0310%27 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0312%27 Jun
mirage13–70.015%5 Jun
mirage13–40.0212%5 Jun
dust29–13-0.0613%3 Jun
mirage13–30.0217%2 Jun
cache12–12-0.049%2 Jun
dust213–110.0111%2 Jun
dust213–60.0217%31 May
anubis8–13-0.064%30 May
ancient13–9-0.039%30 May
ancient7–13-0.0218%30 May
nuke11–13-0.022%25 May
ancient13–10.1010%25 May
mirage13–5-0.0312%25 May
dust25–13-0.075%25 May
dust213–10-0.0412%25 May
anubis4–13-0.104%25 May
dust23–130.0121%23 May
dust211–13-0.018%23 May
ancient9–13-0.0110%22 May
dust213–10-0.0314%22 May
cache13–10-0.0415%22 May
nuke13–110.0516%21 May
dust211–130.0117%21 May
ancient2–13-0.0017%21 May
mirage9–13-0.0416%21 May
dust213–80.1414%20 May
dust215–15-0.0513%20 May
anubis13–50.0112%20 May
inferno13–100.0118%19 May
mirage16–130.0115%19 May
dust216–130.0511%19 May
mirage13–70.0225%19 May
cache19–16-0.0718%17 May
cache6–13-0.0117%16 May
ancient16–13-0.018%16 May
dust28–130.0219%12 May
ancient7–130.0210%11 May
dust213–100.0415%11 May
mirage5–13-0.0124%11 May
inferno7–13-0.0816%10 May
dust213–100.0317%10 May
mirage6–13-0.0510%9 May
cache9–13-0.0216%9 May
inferno9–13-0.0421%9 May
mirage12–160.0416%8 May
nuke5–13-0.0321%8 May
mirage1–9-0.0757%8 May
dust26–13-0.0211%8 May
overpass6–13-0.0528%8 May
cache16–140.0214%7 May
ancient6–13-0.0518%7 May
dust213–10-0.056%6 May
dust219–170.0119%6 May
mirage13–60.1131%6 May
cache5–130.0043%6 May
ancient13–50.0234%6 May
cache13–160.0623%5 May
anubis13–90.019%5 May
cache13–90.0211%1 May
mirage16–140.0416%1 May
cache8–130.0412%1 May
mirage9–13-0.0617%30 Apr
cache13–70.0518%30 Apr
cache13–110.0630%30 Apr
dust213–110.0037%30 Apr
dust214–16-0.0618%29 Apr
dust213–6-0.0225%29 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →