3nzo

3nzo — CS2 Stats

US76561197960864577[U:1:598849]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,159Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.0 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,031Blue band · top ~38.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−403Premier CS Rating · 13,434 → 13,031

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,031 +751 30 Aug – 17 Oct · 31 days played
9,99913,434peak 13,43430 Aug17 Oct
13,745Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 403 below peak (13,434)
  • +1,947 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,969 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG3nzoFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER13,031 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim26
Positioning37
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–53–1Last 10046%Win rateLLWLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 6%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 654ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim2.6
Utility2.2
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.6
Positioning3.7
Utility2.2
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 3.0/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.06 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time643ms+35ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy9.0%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 9.1% → last ⅓ avg 9.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 28 Sept →
21%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · mirage, 23 Sept →
469msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 15 Oct →
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 4 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 65% over 23anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2315–865%-0.03
dust2C229–1341%-0.06
mirageB168–850%-0.04
nukeD134–931%-0.07
anubisD103–730%-0.05
infernoC94–544%-0.05
cacheD62–433%-0.04
overpass—11–0100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

45Matches
31%Win rate
0.55Avg K/D
50.0ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage633%0.486.5
Inferno425%0.489.5
Italy20%0.6110.5
Dust220%0.345.5
Anubis20%0.243.5
Thera10%0.193.0
Ancient1100%0.866.0
Vertigo10%0.294.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.2%Headshot accuracy
28.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.7%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
653msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
35.5%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
5.38HE damage / grenade
2.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.2088% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3621 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.9427% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–13-0.090%17 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.068%16 Oct →
cache13–6-0.063%16 Oct →
dust214–16-0.125%16 Oct →
ancient9–1-0.0614%16 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0611%15 Oct →
dust23–13-0.107%15 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0711%15 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0310%15 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.0316%14 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0610%14 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0911%14 Oct →
ancient13–70.0010%14 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0415%13 Oct →
dust213–100.046%13 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0410%13 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.049%10 Oct →
cache11–13-0.069%10 Oct →
dust27–13-0.088%10 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0913%10 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0614%10 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0616%9 Oct →
dust24–13-0.116%9 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.069%9 Oct →
anubis7–40.0417%8 Oct →
ancient13–80.013%8 Oct →
mirage0–10-0.090%8 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.049%7 Oct →
dust24–13-0.120%7 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0212%6 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0211%6 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.079%5 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.077%5 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.1110%4 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0911%4 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0616%4 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.064%4 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0619%3 Oct →
ancient13–80.0114%3 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0514%3 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.073%3 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.049%2 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0215%2 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.037%2 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0719%2 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.073%2 Oct →
inferno13–30.0113%2 Oct →
mirage13–60.0320%1 Oct →
ancient13–110.028%1 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.068%1 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0412%1 Oct →
dust213–9-0.076%1 Oct →
dust22–13-0.068%1 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.079%30 Sept →
cache9–13-0.039%30 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0013%30 Sept →
cache7–13-0.088%29 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0913%29 Sept →
cache16–13-0.034%28 Sept →
mirage13–60.0612%28 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0610%28 Sept →
dust211–13-0.044%28 Sept →
anubis13–100.058%27 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0110%27 Sept →
cache4–130.016%27 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0413%27 Sept →
overpass13–30.0019%25 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0514%25 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.118%25 Sept →
inferno6–2-0.050%24 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.058%24 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.053%24 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0212%23 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0621%23 Sept →
ancient13–40.048%22 Sept →
ancient13–80.0215%22 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.086%22 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.055%22 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.1017%21 Sept →
dust29–13-0.106%21 Sept →
dust216–14-0.085%21 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.065%21 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.093%21 Sept →
dust22–6-0.108%19 Sept →
dust211–13-0.069%19 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0911%18 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.089%17 Sept →
nuke13–50.002%17 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0312%17 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0311%17 Sept →
dust213–110.038%17 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0617%17 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.110%17 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0211%16 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0318%16 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.1217%16 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.138%15 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.114%15 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0312%14 Sept →
dust214–16-0.067%14 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.