Ru55kiii

Ru55kiii — CS2 Stats

76561198529636679[U:1:569370951]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,470Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,691Top 10% of 211,494 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15556 of 258675 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,092 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,470 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,691 +1,308 11 Aug – 29 Oct · 32 days played
24,38327,703peak 27,70311 Aug29 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,092 +0 29 Aug – 29 Oct · 6 observations
1,0921,092peak 1,09229 Aug29 Oct
27,703Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,092Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-08-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,092
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 109 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,012 below peak (27,703)
  • -1,737 over 30 days · declining
  • +1,308 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,309 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRu55kiiiFACEITLevel 8 · 1,092 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,691 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,092csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning64
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–41–5Last 10054%Win rateLLWTWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · +40ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility2.5
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 49% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.4
Utility2.5
Mechanics9.2
Opening Duels6.5
Win Impact1.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time588ms+41ms
first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+4.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 5–2 · vertigo, 2 Sept →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · cache, 3 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 12–16 · anubis, 18 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 18 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
11–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2313–1057%0.02
dust2A2214–864%0.00
ancientB147–750%-0.02
nukeS118–373%-0.03
infernoC104–640%-0.02
cacheA74–357%-0.03
vertigoB63–350%0.04
anubisD51–420%0.00
poseidon—10–10%-0.14
office—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

517Matches
51%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
85.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11750%0.9615.9
Dust211057%0.9616.7
Ancient8349%1.0317.2
Anubis3642%0.7813.1
Nuke3135%1.0215.4
Cache3047%0.9216.3
Inferno2770%0.9014.6
Vertigo1479%1.1417.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.7%Spray accuracy
91.6%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
597msReaction time
63.7%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.29Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
7.19HE damage / grenade
2.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.295 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.095%26 Oct →
dust211–130.0121%26 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0121%26 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0319%26 Oct →
cache13–40.0113%26 Oct →
mirage13–160.0015%26 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0923%25 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0629%25 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0431%24 Oct →
inferno13–50.0126%22 Oct →
nuke13–90.0224%22 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0519%14 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.1338%13 Oct →
inferno9–60.1126%13 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0424%12 Oct →
mirage13–30.0018%12 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0016%12 Oct →
mirage13–30.0722%12 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0327%12 Oct →
mirage9–130.0124%4 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0831%4 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0438%4 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0218%4 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0227%3 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0347%3 Oct →
mirage11–130.0724%2 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0324%2 Oct →
mirage9–130.0216%1 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0517%29 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0412%28 Sept →
dust27–130.0519%27 Sept →
ancient13–50.0518%27 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0031%27 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0219%20 Sept →
inferno6–90.0436%20 Sept →
dust213–100.0119%18 Sept →
mirage13–20.0326%18 Sept →
nuke13–2-0.0210%18 Sept →
dust213–40.0147%18 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.169%12 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0314%10 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0112%9 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0122%3 Sept →
mirage13–50.0130%3 Sept →
poseidon8–8-0.1419%2 Sept →
vertigo5–20.1721%2 Sept →
mirage13–60.0215%2 Sept →
dust28–130.0226%30 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0310%29 Aug →
dust213–80.0325%28 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0216%28 Aug →
ancient13–50.0116%28 Aug →
vertigo13–11-0.0133%27 Aug →
vertigo13–100.0830%26 Aug →
mirage10–130.0714%26 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0318%26 Aug →
mirage13–80.0818%25 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.009%25 Aug →
dust213–2-0.0213%23 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0328%23 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0416%23 Aug →
nuke13–110.0329%23 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0519%22 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0416%22 Aug →
anubis10–130.0020%22 Aug →
dust213–80.0519%21 Aug →
inferno13–90.0020%21 Aug →
mirage13–90.0114%21 Aug →
vertigo7–130.0125%20 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0219%19 Aug →
mirage13–50.0012%19 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0213%19 Aug →
dust213–50.0417%19 Aug →
nuke13–60.0126%19 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0326%18 Aug →
anubis12–16-0.0614%18 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0316%18 Aug →
office9–13-0.0230%18 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0113%18 Aug →
mirage13–90.0326%17 Aug →
ancient13–70.0212%17 Aug →
mirage11–130.0224%17 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0213%17 Aug →
ancient13–60.0915%17 Aug →
mirage13–70.0218%17 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0216%16 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0216%16 Aug →
vertigo5–9-0.0218%15 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0317%14 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0621%14 Aug →
vertigo2–130.0321%13 Aug →
anubis13–30.1123%13 Aug →
mirage13–110.0323%12 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0927%12 Aug →
dust213–80.0915%12 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0022%12 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.039%11 Aug →
dust213–70.0111%11 Aug →
inferno16–12-0.0120%11 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0115%11 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.