Adolen

Adolen — CS2 Stats

SE76561197966663079[U:1:6397351]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,115Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,698Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,124 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (47 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,124 → 2,124
+3Tracked matches · now 2,115
+3.3ppWin rate · 40.0% → 43.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,426 -2,963 19 Mar – 21 Jun · 7 days played
17,42621,306peak 21,30619 Mar21 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,124 +0 1 Sept – 19 Sept · 2 observations
2,1242,124peak 2,1241 Sept19 Sept
21,473Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,124Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-03-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,124
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 376 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate48.0%48.2%50.9%3.0% short
Shot accuracy16.8%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.951.071.090.14 short
Match win rate47.9%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAdolenFACEITLevel 9 · 2,124 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,124csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning41
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–48Last 10052%Win rateWWWWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · −161ms reaction

Win rate up 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 9–1 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 618ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility4.4
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 646ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.1
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time620ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy25.1%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–6 · anubis, 12 Apr →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · dust2, 13 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 4 May →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 13 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W6Current streak
7–19In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2512–1348%0.01
dust2C219–1243%0.01
infernoA138–562%0.01
anubisB137–654%0.02
ancientD93–633%-0.00
cacheS86–275%-0.00
nuke—44–0100%0.02
overpass—32–167%0.06
vertigo—20–20%-0.01
cache_b—10–10%0.04
train—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

214,370Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
8,662Matches
47.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
48.0%Headshot %
16.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
26,151MVPs
4,903Hours (in match)
6,145Bombs planted
2,437Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4780,883
AWP21,872
FAMAS4,894
Knife4,791
P2502,438

Lifetime map wins

18,208inferno
18,130dust2
7,119nuke
5,458train
2,410cbble
2,095vertigo
115aztec
54dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,725Matches
51%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
74.8ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust219647%0.8814.5
Mirage17354%0.8614.0
Ancient12636%0.8213.9
Anubis12552%0.8714.1
Inferno10353%0.9714.5
Nuke6143%0.8814.7
Overpass3956%0.8414.1
Cache2171%0.8612.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
75.2%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
646msReaction time
22.1%T opening success
39.4%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
13.33HE damage / grenade
3.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.837 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.0666% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–9-0.0631%1 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0118%26 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0226%26 Oct →
cache13–10.0215%13 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0122%13 Sept →
dust213–00.0652%13 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0013%12 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0417%3 Sept →
anubis13–60.0034%9 Aug →
inferno13–110.0329%9 Aug →
dust211–130.0226%8 Aug →
dust211–130.0222%1 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0535%30 Jul →
dust214–16-0.0514%16 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0432%14 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0627%13 Jul →
anubis11–130.0222%12 Jul →
cache16–14-0.0332%12 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0713%9 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0528%4 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0914%25 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0719%25 Jun →
mirage14–160.0231%21 Jun →
inferno13–40.0528%21 Jun →
mirage11–130.0439%21 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0719%20 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0227%19 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0226%19 Jun →
mirage0–2-0.090%13 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0225%13 Jun →
mirage7–130.0042%9 Jun →
cache13–40.1129%6 Jun →
cache13–11-0.0221%6 Jun →
dust211–13-0.057%6 Jun →
cache13–90.0830%30 May →
mirage13–10.0126%30 May →
vertigo14–160.0233%29 May →
mirage11–130.0526%24 May →
mirage9–130.0133%16 May →
inferno13–60.0125%16 May →
dust213–100.0829%16 May →
anubis11–130.0024%16 May →
ancient13–60.0423%9 May →
inferno6–13-0.0314%4 May →
mirage11–13-0.0216%1 May →
mirage13–60.0432%1 May →
dust29–13-0.0124%29 Apr →
mirage16–130.1427%29 Apr →
anubis2–13-0.1110%28 Apr →
mirage16–130.0425%27 Apr →
overpass13–10-0.0223%26 Apr →
anubis13–110.0624%21 Apr →
nuke13–50.1423%20 Apr →
dust213–80.0628%20 Apr →
mirage10–130.1320%19 Apr →
cache_b10–130.0425%19 Apr →
mirage13–30.1526%19 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0130%19 Apr →
inferno14–160.0519%19 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0216%19 Apr →
train13–80.0225%19 Apr →
inferno7–130.0331%13 Apr →
anubis16–130.0223%13 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0119%13 Apr →
dust213–10.0614%12 Apr →
inferno13–60.0916%12 Apr →
mirage19–150.0917%12 Apr →
anubis13–60.1629%12 Apr →
anubis20–22-0.0014%11 Apr →
inferno22–20-0.0618%11 Apr →
dust213–50.0522%11 Apr →
inferno13–40.0019%11 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0614%11 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0018%11 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0513%11 Apr →
ancient9–130.0528%11 Apr →
dust29–130.0114%11 Apr →
mirage7–130.0113%11 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0621%26 Mar →
anubis2–13-0.0635%26 Mar →
anubis13–50.0622%25 Mar →
overpass6–130.0920%24 Mar →
vertigo1–10-0.0434%24 Mar →
anubis10–130.0923%23 Mar →
overpass13–90.1231%23 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0322%22 Mar →
dust213–110.0323%22 Mar →
nuke13–9-0.0417%22 Mar →
dust29–130.0220%22 Mar →
dust27–130.0129%22 Mar →
mirage13–2-0.0221%22 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0510%22 Mar →
nuke13–100.0226%21 Mar →
inferno13–80.0418%21 Mar →
anubis13–9-0.0018%20 Mar →
ancient13–30.0114%20 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0122%20 Mar →
dust213–40.0524%19 Mar →
mirage13–30.0425%19 Mar →
mirage13–100.0023%19 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.