Bekker

Bekker — CS2 Stats

DK76561197965584020[U:1:5318292]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

946Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since
986Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,009 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 13 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

16,160Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,009Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-06-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,009
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 42 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-22
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,790), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate40.3%43.8%44.8%4.5% short
Shot accuracy4.9%12.0%12.5%7.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.831.021.040.21 short
Match win rate45.4%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBekkerFACEITLevel 5 · 1,009 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,009csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37
Positioning54
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4951Last 10049%Win rateWLWLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim3.7
Utility6.5
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 57% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 58% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7
Positioning5.4
Utility6.5
Mechanics1.9
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact3.9

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time547ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.05Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 22 Aug
29%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · nuke, 20 Aug
313msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · nuke, 12 Aug
13–2Biggest win · cache, 6 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
1011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
21Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 15overpassWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC30131743%-0.03
cacheC2071335%-0.04
anubisS1511473%-0.04
nukeS1510567%-0.03
infernoC73443%-0.03
overpassD51420%-0.03
vertigo41325%-0.05
dust232167%-0.04
mirage110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,983Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
2,378Matches
45.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
40.3%Headshot %
4.9%Shot accuracy
2,845MVPs
986Hours (in match)
1,211Bombs planted
353Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,594nuke
2,694inferno
1,208dust2
1,147vertigo
762train
20ar_shoots
20ar_baggage
12cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

202Matches
49%Win rate
0.78Avg K/D
66.3ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5946%0.7712.5
Anubis3656%0.7912.6
Nuke3364%0.8513.2
Cache2030%0.7012.4
Inferno1735%0.6712.4
Overpass1338%0.7113.0
Dust21164%0.7612.9
Train580%1.3518.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.0%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
58.5%Counter-strafing
12.9°Preaim
542msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
43.7%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
9.31HE damage / grenade
17.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.9471° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.0418% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–6-0.0211%19 Sept
vertigo7–13-0.037%19 Sept
cache13–5-0.0725%19 Sept
cache3–13-0.0114%18 Sept
cache12–16-0.0714%16 Sept
nuke13–50.0012%16 Sept
vertigo10–13-0.060%13 Sept
cache13–8-0.0222%13 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0411%13 Sept
dust213–6-0.0612%11 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0612%11 Sept
cache17–19-0.0215%29 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0516%29 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0319%29 Aug
cache3–13-0.0316%29 Aug
cache6–13-0.0413%28 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0321%28 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0815%26 Aug
cache7–13-0.0620%26 Aug
mirage13–70.059%22 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0411%22 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0115%21 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0510%21 Aug
ancient13–80.0314%20 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0310%20 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0229%20 Aug
cache8–13-0.0310%19 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0214%16 Aug
cache17–190.0012%16 Aug
nuke22–20-0.0015%12 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0517%12 Aug
ancient10–13-0.059%8 Aug
ancient7–13-0.059%7 Aug
vertigo13–4-0.028%6 Aug
anubis13–9-0.072%6 Aug
ancient14–16-0.058%6 Aug
cache13–2-0.0312%6 Aug
dust23–13-0.0916%6 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0117%2 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0115%2 Aug
inferno13–70.026%30 Jul
ancient13–110.0314%30 Jul
inferno10–13-0.095%30 Jul
inferno13–10-0.024%29 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0211%29 Jul
cache13–11-0.0612%29 Jul
ancient13–9-0.058%28 Jul
cache10–13-0.0416%28 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0228%28 Jul
cache7–13-0.007%28 Jul
nuke6–13-0.045%27 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0213%27 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0611%24 Jul
nuke12–16-0.109%24 Jul
ancient16–140.0214%23 Jul
inferno16–140.0112%23 Jul
cache13–11-0.066%23 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0813%23 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0115%22 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0114%22 Jul
ancient9–13-0.088%22 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0422%22 Jul
anubis28–25-0.0211%20 Jul
ancient13–9-0.039%17 Jul
nuke12–16-0.005%17 Jul
anubis16–12-0.035%15 Jul
nuke13–40.0112%12 Jul
cache13–5-0.0215%12 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0210%12 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0520%12 Jul
anubis13–9-0.076%12 Jul
ancient17–19-0.0615%10 Jul
anubis13–80.0010%10 Jul
anubis13–2-0.0217%9 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0317%9 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0617%8 Jul
cache7–13-0.0112%8 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0810%8 Jul
nuke13–6-0.057%8 Jul
overpass16–140.0219%5 Jul
anubis13–8-0.039%4 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0112%4 Jul
cache13–7-0.0311%4 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0513%4 Jul
cache5–13-0.0619%2 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0912%28 Jun
overpass11–130.007%28 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0114%26 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0311%26 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0710%25 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0613%24 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0723%21 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0810%21 Jun
overpass10–13-0.037%21 Jun
overpass8–13-0.067%20 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0417%20 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0510%18 Jun
dust216–120.0214%17 Jun
ancient13–3-0.0411%14 Jun
cache13–16-0.0518%13 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →