delicious

delicious — CS2 Stats

76561197965060386[U:1:4794658]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,154Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,069Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,077Purple band · top ~16.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,605 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,077 -3,477 14 Feb – 25 Oct · 16 days played
18,07722,887peak 22,88714 Feb25 Oct
22,887Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,605Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-02-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,605
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 146 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,810 below peak (22,887)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,923 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate41.3%45.7%46.8%5.5% short
Shot accuracy19.8%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.111.051.06above
Match win rate44.7%45.7%46.3%1.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdeliciousFACEITLevel 7 · 1,605 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,077 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,605csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning50
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateLWWWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +5.3pp headshot accuracy · −4ms reaction

Win rate up 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.5
Utility5.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning5.0
Utility5.7
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time560ms−84ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 12.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 24 Aug →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 23 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · ancient, 25 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 24 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
20Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 78% over 9ancientWeakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2111–1052%-0.01
ancientC176–1135%-0.03
anubisC177–1041%-0.01
dust2A106–460%-0.01
infernoC104–640%-0.02
overpassS97–278%-0.01
cacheC83–538%-0.01
mirage—42–250%-0.02
vertigo—22–0100%0.03
office—11–0100%-0.03
stronghold—10–10%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

108,349Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
4,746Matches
44.7%Match win rate
41.3%Headshot %
19.8%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 7 players
10,614MVPs
2,230Hours (in match)
6,838Bombs planted
1,480Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4735,478
AWP7,209
MP74,447
P2503,065
P902,747

Lifetime map wins

6,001inferno
5,279nuke
4,008vertigo
3,570dust2
2,288train
1,237cbble
588dust
304office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,026Matches
51%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
68.5ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke4551%0.9214.9
Ancient4432%0.7311.4
Inferno3540%0.9114.2
Anubis3241%0.8613.5
Overpass2348%0.9313.8
Dust21540%0.8112.7
Train1242%0.8915.8
Mirage1060%1.1318.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
68.4%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
560msReaction time
22.3%T opening success
55.0%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
8.95HE damage / grenade
7.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.2511% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0420%28 Oct →
ancient13–60.0116%25 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0216%25 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0214%25 Oct →
ancient13–2-0.0020%25 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0323%20 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0318%14 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0210%14 Oct →
cache11–130.0226%14 Oct →
dust213–100.0522%10 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.0517%9 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0216%9 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.055%6 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0611%6 Oct →
nuke11–130.0215%6 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0414%6 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0615%30 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0517%30 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0314%30 Sept →
dust210–13-0.068%22 Sept →
cache4–13-0.056%22 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0517%22 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0613%20 Sept →
vertigo13–110.0011%20 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.038%16 Sept →
nuke13–110.0320%16 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0222%15 Sept →
anubis13–100.0910%15 Sept →
inferno16–140.0223%15 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0214%15 Sept →
nuke13–80.0014%5 Sept →
anubis13–110.0215%5 Sept →
ancient13–70.0414%24 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0214%24 Aug →
anubis13–10.1221%24 Aug →
office13–6-0.038%24 Aug →
nuke9–00.0813%24 Aug →
dust24–130.0639%23 Aug →
cache10–130.0129%23 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0019%17 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0824%17 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0619%17 Aug →
cache11–13-0.049%17 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0412%10 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0718%10 Aug →
nuke16–120.0512%2 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.1014%2 Aug →
dust216–12-0.0316%2 Aug →
cache10–13-0.029%2 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0518%2 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0518%24 Jun →
mirage16–140.0111%23 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0214%23 Jun →
overpass13–50.0138%23 Jun →
nuke13–50.0516%22 Jun →
dust216–120.0114%22 Jun →
ancient5–13-0.0314%21 Jun →
stronghold6–130.0816%21 Jun →
overpass15–15-0.059%13 May →
dust213–40.0725%1 May →
overpass16–13-0.0317%28 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.0412%28 Apr →
nuke13–60.0426%22 Apr →
ancient3–13-0.079%22 Apr →
ancient16–13-0.0215%22 Apr →
inferno15–15-0.0210%22 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0910%18 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.039%18 Apr →
anubis9–13-0.024%18 Apr →
nuke15–15-0.0411%18 Apr →
nuke13–80.019%18 Apr →
inferno13–80.0110%18 Apr →
dust213–8-0.024%18 Apr →
anubis13–5-0.0312%18 Apr →
ancient11–130.0310%18 Apr →
ancient16–140.0214%11 Apr →
nuke14–160.0316%31 Mar →
inferno13–7-0.0415%28 Mar →
inferno11–130.0012%24 Mar →
ancient2–13-0.0612%24 Mar →
overpass13–80.0015%24 Mar →
anubis13–9-0.0310%24 Mar →
nuke1–13-0.0717%24 Mar →
anubis6–13-0.0214%17 Mar →
overpass13–110.0020%17 Mar →
nuke5–13-0.0528%17 Mar →
nuke13–90.0119%10 Mar →
overpass9–13-0.0410%10 Mar →
anubis13–16-0.0411%24 Feb →
inferno12–16-0.0516%24 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0517%24 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0813%24 Feb →
mirage13–7-0.0511%22 Feb →
overpass16–14-0.009%17 Feb →
overpass16–140.0010%17 Feb →
ancient13–4-0.018%17 Feb →
nuke13–10-0.0219%14 Feb →
anubis13–30.0013%14 Feb →
inferno13–8-0.0310%14 Feb →
overpass13–8-0.0312%3 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.