ec'nomic

ec'nomic — CS2 Stats

FI76561197963070116[U:1:2804388]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,465Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,647Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21911 of 260007 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,580 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 +1,321 9 May – 2 Nov · 28 days played
23,19227,219peak 27,2199 May2 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,580 +0 31 Aug – 21 Sept · 4 observations
1,5801,580peak 1,58031 Aug21 Sept
27,413Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,580Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-05-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,580
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 171 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,219 below peak (27,219)
  • +1,808 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate49.0%46.8%48.2%meets
Shot accuracy13.5%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.821.061.070.25 short
Match win rate47.7%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGec'nomicFACEITLevel 8 · 1,580 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,580csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning40
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–36–4Last 10060%Win rateTLLWWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −32ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.6
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.0
Utility5.6
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time562ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy13.6%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 9–5 · nuke, 26 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–7 · inferno, 8 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · dust2, 22 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 3 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 93% over 14dust2Weakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS1913–668%-0.03
ancientA169–756%-0.03
anubisS1413–193%-0.02
mirageB137–654%-0.04
dust2D113–827%-0.05
cacheS107–370%-0.03
infernoC104–640%-0.07
overpassA53–260%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.11
poseidon—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

82,434Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
4,255Matches
47.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
49.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
13.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
7,986MVPs
2,188Hours (in match)
4,658Bombs planted
1,028Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,600
AWP5,039
MP92,783
Knife1,661
FAMAS1,114

Lifetime map wins

7,114nuke
6,405inferno
5,438dust2
3,870train
724vertigo
39cbble
31office
15aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,219Matches
51%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
65.1ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis16553%0.8812.9
Nuke15662%0.8913.0
Ancient13457%0.8712.7
Mirage12530%0.7611.9
Dust27642%0.8712.9
Overpass3161%0.7411.9
Train2959%0.9212.6
Inferno1828%0.7212.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
71.0%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
534msReaction time
27.2%T opening success
37.6%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
7.94HE damage / grenade
11.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4401% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2409% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient15–15-0.0114%2 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0619%2 Nov →
dust20–13-0.110%31 Oct →
anubis13–90.015%31 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0318%31 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0616%23 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0513%22 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0419%22 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0618%21 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0121%21 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0220%21 Oct →
anubis13–50.0315%17 Oct →
anubis13–50.0113%8 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0516%6 Oct →
dust213–80.0219%6 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0321%4 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0412%30 Sept →
vertigo6–9-0.118%26 Sept →
nuke9–50.0814%26 Sept →
inferno9–6-0.0110%26 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.090%25 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.099%25 Sept →
nuke0–7-0.060%25 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0319%8 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0219%5 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0516%4 Sept →
cache13–40.047%4 Sept →
dust213–11-0.068%4 Sept →
nuke13–20.0614%30 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0423%30 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0714%29 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0317%29 Aug →
inferno7–9-0.0512%29 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.076%28 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0615%28 Aug →
overpass9–40.0330%28 Aug →
inferno9–3-0.099%28 Aug →
poseidon9–40.0628%28 Aug →
inferno9–3-0.1010%28 Aug →
nuke13–40.0227%27 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.066%27 Aug →
anubis13–90.0121%27 Aug →
ancient13–40.0112%26 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0123%26 Aug →
cache10–13-0.038%26 Aug →
mirage13–80.0119%25 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0213%25 Aug →
ancient13–30.028%25 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0313%25 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0134%25 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0716%25 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.0213%24 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.1213%22 Aug →
cache13–50.0119%22 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0022%21 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0218%21 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.045%20 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0229%20 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.049%20 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.046%19 Aug →
inferno9–7-0.2250%8 Aug →
inferno3–90.0217%7 Aug →
nuke8–8-0.067%7 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0226%7 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0523%3 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0127%3 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0728%3 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0812%3 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0722%28 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0214%28 Jul →
ancient13–100.0814%15 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0313%11 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0313%11 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.090%1 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.067%1 Jul →
mirage8–3-0.025%1 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0810%17 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.029%17 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.089%16 Jun →
anubis16–13-0.0313%16 Jun →
ancient13–100.0510%14 Jun →
cache5–13-0.0117%14 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0017%12 Jun →
ancient1–13-0.116%11 Jun →
mirage0–13-0.1130%11 Jun →
anubis13–6-0.0711%11 Jun →
nuke13–20.009%4 Jun →
overpass8–13-0.043%4 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0242%3 Jun →
anubis13–10.026%3 Jun →
anubis13–10-0.0727%21 May →
dust24–13-0.0718%19 May →
nuke13–70.0214%19 May →
cache13–7-0.069%18 May →
overpass13–8-0.0617%18 May →
ancient13–80.0130%17 May →
inferno15–15-0.0513%9 May →
overpass13–70.0116%9 May →
inferno6–13-0.0619%8 May →
overpass11–130.0330%8 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.