✪ ENS;.

✪ ENS;. — CS2 Stats

DE76561197962095168[U:1:1829440]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,844Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,677Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,736Purple band · top ~17.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,736 -2,378 4 Aug – 19 Sept · 30 days played
17,73621,945peak 21,9454 Aug19 Sept
22,932Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-08-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,209 below peak (21,945)
  • -3,679 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,264 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,998), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate45.1%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy12.0%11.3%12.0%meets
Kill/death ratio1.130.991.02above
Match win rate50.1%43.9%44.7%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 5 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ ENS;.FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER17,736 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning40
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateLLLLLLTLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +5.0pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility6.3
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.0
Utility6.3
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time517ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 530ms → last ⅓ avg 517ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–7 · anubis, 25 Aug →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 15 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · ancient, 13 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 23 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L6Current streak
11–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9ancientWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2412–1250%-0.01
nukeB178–947%0.04
cacheB147–750%0.02
infernoA149–564%0.01
mirageC125–742%-0.00
ancientD103–730%0.02
anubisS97–278%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

70,092Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
3,968Matches
50.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
45.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
12.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
10,370MVPs
1,677Hours (in match)
7,087Bombs planted
1,689Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

12,939nuke
8,456inferno
3,690dust2
3,099vertigo
931train
591office
388cbble
203lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
72.2%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
499msReaction time
18.5%T opening success
36.8%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
10.72HE damage / grenade
7.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.4639% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–130.0516%19 Sept →
mirage8–130.0323%16 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0512%15 Sept →
inferno10–130.0021%14 Sept →
ancient11–130.0220%12 Sept →
dust210–130.0116%12 Sept →
ancient15–150.0321%12 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0635%12 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0116%12 Sept →
dust213–30.0422%12 Sept →
inferno13–40.0216%12 Sept →
cache13–70.0217%12 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.022%12 Sept →
anubis13–110.0716%10 Sept →
nuke7–130.0823%9 Sept →
nuke10–130.0720%9 Sept →
mirage13–70.035%9 Sept →
inferno11–130.0211%8 Sept →
dust28–130.0223%7 Sept →
anubis13–110.0318%7 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0335%7 Sept →
cache10–130.0917%5 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0234%5 Sept →
nuke13–40.0610%5 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0017%5 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0011%5 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.078%5 Sept →
dust213–70.0218%5 Sept →
dust213–8-0.052%5 Sept →
dust20–4-0.040%5 Sept →
mirage11–3-0.0133%5 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0016%2 Sept →
cache13–110.0716%2 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0527%2 Sept →
inferno13–80.0214%2 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0020%29 Aug →
mirage16–130.0417%29 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0411%29 Aug →
inferno13–30.029%28 Aug →
dust213–50.0921%27 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0321%27 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0317%25 Aug →
anubis13–70.1915%25 Aug →
ancient7–130.0423%25 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0618%24 Aug →
dust213–50.0115%24 Aug →
nuke13–110.0324%24 Aug →
ancient10–130.0616%24 Aug →
inferno10–130.0811%23 Aug →
anubis13–90.039%23 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0016%23 Aug →
nuke1–13-0.0416%23 Aug →
nuke13–50.1335%23 Aug →
anubis13–10.0617%23 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0220%23 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.049%23 Aug →
cache13–30.0515%23 Aug →
mirage13–50.0313%22 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0015%22 Aug →
dust213–100.0021%22 Aug →
cache8–130.1226%21 Aug →
nuke10–130.1920%21 Aug →
cache10–130.0312%18 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0620%17 Aug →
nuke13–60.1019%17 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0220%15 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0326%15 Aug →
nuke11–130.0412%15 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0523%15 Aug →
dust213–11-0.043%15 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0537%15 Aug →
nuke16–13-0.0018%15 Aug →
dust213–80.0515%15 Aug →
dust27–130.0124%14 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0628%14 Aug →
ancient13–90.029%13 Aug →
dust216–12-0.013%12 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0520%12 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0319%12 Aug →
nuke13–60.0736%9 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0416%9 Aug →
cache13–90.1323%8 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0115%8 Aug →
anubis13–70.0531%6 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0123%6 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.029%6 Aug →
dust29–130.0219%5 Aug →
inferno16–120.0514%5 Aug →
ancient13–110.0119%5 Aug →
ancient10–130.0616%5 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0313%5 Aug →
anubis13–110.0318%5 Aug →
mirage13–100.0514%5 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0921%4 Aug →
dust213–90.0414%4 Aug →
inferno13–70.048%4 Aug →
inferno13–70.0524%4 Aug →
ancient13–60.0931%4 Aug →
nuke7–30.015%4 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0232%4 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.