bnet1

bnet1 — CS2 Stats

76561197961573715[U:1:1307987]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

630Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (41 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,837 → 1,837
+7Tracked matches · now 630
+3.3ppWin rate · 40.0% → 43.3%

Rating over time

1,837Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-02-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,837
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 164 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-24
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-24

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbnet1PEAK ELO1,837csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning43
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–51Last 10049%Win rateWLWLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +15ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility5.9
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch0.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.3
Utility5.9
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time549ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 547ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–9 · ancient, 18 Feb →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · inferno, 26 Feb →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 27 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 18 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 61% over 18mirageWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2714–1352%0.01
ancientA1811–761%0.01
dust2C156–940%0.00
overpassA148–657%0.02
mirageD102–820%0.00
cache_bA74–357%0.00
nukeC73–443%0.01
anubis—21–150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

464Matches
55%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
72.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

23%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21060%1.2817.4
Inferno978%0.9615.0
Ancient757%1.2115.0
Mirage540%0.8313.2
Cache560%1.3115.4
Nuke560%1.0116.6
Overpass367%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.2%Spray accuracy
66.4%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
545msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
28.2%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
8.98HE damage / grenade
7.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6601% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10-0.0722%27 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0422%27 Oct →
overpass13–10-0.0226%17 Jun →
ancient2–13-0.0822%17 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0726%30 Mar →
cache_b10–13-0.0329%30 Mar →
overpass13–90.0515%8 Mar →
inferno8–130.0231%8 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0124%5 Mar →
nuke6–13-0.0426%5 Mar →
inferno13–11-0.0214%5 Mar →
cache_b9–130.0210%5 Mar →
cache_b13–110.0124%2 Mar →
ancient11–130.0129%2 Mar →
dust216–140.0323%2 Mar →
inferno13–100.0119%2 Mar →
mirage13–7-0.0117%26 Feb →
dust213–100.0123%26 Feb →
inferno6–13-0.0542%26 Feb →
ancient3–130.0426%26 Feb →
dust211–130.0320%25 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0111%25 Feb →
overpass13–7-0.0216%25 Feb →
inferno13–60.0821%25 Feb →
dust27–130.0138%24 Feb →
ancient13–6-0.0029%24 Feb →
inferno13–10-0.0218%24 Feb →
dust26–130.0123%24 Feb →
overpass5–13-0.0716%24 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0233%24 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0619%24 Feb →
overpass7–13-0.0126%24 Feb →
mirage5–130.0117%19 Feb →
inferno13–50.0317%19 Feb →
ancient13–60.0637%19 Feb →
dust219–170.0314%19 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0523%19 Feb →
overpass13–100.0720%19 Feb →
ancient13–90.1218%18 Feb →
overpass13–10.0511%18 Feb →
inferno8–130.0118%18 Feb →
overpass9–130.0015%18 Feb →
inferno13–50.1026%18 Feb →
ancient13–110.0526%18 Feb →
cache_b16–120.0238%17 Feb →
anubis13–10-0.0224%17 Feb →
inferno11–130.0329%17 Feb →
mirage7–130.0613%17 Feb →
inferno13–40.0218%17 Feb →
dust27–13-0.0611%17 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.0327%17 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.0229%16 Feb →
ancient9–130.0325%16 Feb →
ancient16–13-0.0017%15 Feb →
overpass13–90.0624%15 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0527%15 Feb →
inferno13–50.0418%15 Feb →
dust210–13-0.0341%14 Feb →
nuke13–50.0441%14 Feb →
inferno13–80.0132%14 Feb →
cache_b13–40.0223%14 Feb →
ancient13–10-0.0120%14 Feb →
mirage10–130.0015%14 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.0025%14 Feb →
nuke13–30.0825%14 Feb →
overpass13–10.1022%14 Feb →
dust29–130.0328%13 Feb →
cache_b5–13-0.0426%13 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.0220%13 Feb →
mirage13–60.0031%13 Feb →
inferno6–13-0.0133%13 Feb →
dust213–90.0318%12 Feb →
inferno13–16-0.0524%12 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.0717%10 Feb →
overpass5–13-0.0018%10 Feb →
dust26–130.0015%10 Feb →
mirage6–130.0422%9 Feb →
overpass9–130.0120%9 Feb →
nuke13–60.1231%9 Feb →
overpass9–130.0219%8 Feb →
inferno8–130.0224%6 Feb →
ancient13–100.0120%6 Feb →
dust216–130.0420%6 Feb →
inferno16–140.0627%5 Feb →
ancient6–13-0.0429%5 Feb →
anubis3–13-0.0422%5 Feb →
inferno13–60.0420%5 Feb →
dust213–70.0327%4 Feb →
nuke5–130.0032%4 Feb →
inferno14–16-0.0118%4 Feb →
mirage6–130.0124%4 Feb →
ancient13–40.1228%4 Feb →
inferno13–6-0.0018%4 Feb →
cache_b13–110.0121%2 Feb →
ancient13–40.0718%2 Feb →
dust213–16-0.0512%2 Feb →
inferno5–13-0.0222%2 Feb →
overpass13–110.0417%1 Feb →
ancient13–7-0.0217%1 Feb →
inferno13–60.0418%1 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.