twatlickerer

twatlickerer — CS2 Stats

76561197961541244[U:1:1275516]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,304Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,535Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#60374 of 251234 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,809 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 21,535 → 21,535
0Faceit ELO · 1,809 → 1,809
+6Tracked matches · now 2,304
−10.3ppWin rate · 51.7% → 41.4%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,535 +2,200 27 Mar – 21 Sept · 7 days played
19,08821,535peak 21,53527 Mar21 Sept
21,535Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,809Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-02-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,809
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 192 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-21
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-21

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,535
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,465 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-21
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtwatlickererFACEITLevel 7 · 1,809 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,535 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,809csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning62
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41–56–3Last 10041%Win rateLLLLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −14.2pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility7.3
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.80 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.2
Utility7.3
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time593ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy28.1%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 27.7% → last ⅓ avg 28.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 8 Feb →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 27 Mar →
422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · mirage, 1 Jun →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 31 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L7Current streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 50% over 6ancientWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2812–1643%0.02
mirageB2612–1446%0.00
infernoC145–936%0.01
nukeD124–833%0.00
cacheB63–350%0.03
ancientD61–517%0.02
overpassD51–420%-0.03
anubis—33–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,885Matches
51%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
78.5ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20046%1.0116.5
Dust218948%1.0415.5
Inferno9452%1.0416.2
Ancient8838%0.9914.9
Anubis7348%1.0414.9
Nuke6351%1.0417.7
Vertigo4060%1.1116.5
Overpass1443%1.1719.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.2%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
575msReaction time
37.0%T opening success
58.5%CT opening success
0.80Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
11.95HE damage / grenade
19.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.9617% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0529%4 Oct →
mirage22–250.0425%4 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0516%3 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0211%3 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0437%20 Sept →
cache12–16-0.0124%7 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0215%6 Sept →
mirage13–60.0520%6 Sept →
dust213–90.0218%6 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0314%4 Sept →
mirage5–130.0133%4 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0446%31 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0250%31 Aug →
cache13–60.0923%31 Aug →
nuke13–2-0.0338%31 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0037%29 Aug →
nuke13–110.0149%29 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0232%29 Aug →
mirage13–50.1026%29 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0018%10 Aug →
nuke6–130.0140%7 Aug →
dust213–40.1020%7 Aug →
mirage4–130.0132%7 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0516%7 Aug →
inferno10–130.0623%7 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0441%7 Aug →
inferno13–100.0322%6 Aug →
mirage13–70.0514%6 Aug →
dust28–130.0430%5 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0231%13 Jul →
dust216–13-0.0621%13 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0036%10 Jul →
mirage16–140.0739%10 Jul →
inferno10–130.0331%9 Jul →
cache13–110.0619%9 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0612%15 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.019%14 Jun →
overpass9–13-0.0513%13 Jun →
dust29–130.0028%13 Jun →
ancient7–130.0326%13 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0729%1 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0113%1 Jun →
anubis13–40.0418%1 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0430%1 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0014%1 Jun →
dust213–50.0727%1 Jun →
overpass4–13-0.0730%31 May →
mirage16–14-0.0318%17 May →
cache5–130.0117%9 May →
ancient8–13-0.0254%9 May →
ancient13–50.0837%9 May →
nuke4–130.0828%9 May →
inferno13–10-0.0224%9 May →
dust213–110.1031%9 May →
mirage7–130.0534%9 May →
dust24–13-0.0114%6 May →
dust213–11-0.0230%5 May →
cache17–190.0122%2 May →
cache13–70.0020%28 Apr →
overpass13–160.0616%28 Apr →
mirage13–110.0333%28 Apr →
inferno13–60.1316%24 Apr →
nuke12–16-0.0424%21 Apr →
mirage13–40.0350%20 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0032%20 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.0520%18 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0218%18 Apr →
inferno13–8-0.0231%28 Mar →
dust213–30.1116%28 Mar →
nuke2–130.0332%27 Mar →
inferno13–60.0133%27 Mar →
mirage15–15-0.0318%27 Mar →
anubis13–110.0123%27 Mar →
overpass13–8-0.0316%27 Mar →
dust210–130.0218%27 Mar →
nuke6–13-0.0512%27 Mar →
mirage2–13-0.1125%27 Mar →
dust29–130.0827%27 Mar →
mirage13–70.0342%27 Mar →
dust28–130.0936%27 Mar →
dust213–100.0519%27 Mar →
dust25–130.0130%27 Mar →
dust213–40.1060%27 Mar →
dust210–130.0434%27 Mar →
nuke13–100.0137%27 Mar →
ancient14–160.0218%27 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.0337%24 Mar →
dust213–40.0414%21 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0143%19 Mar →
dust215–150.0324%23 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0318%22 Feb →
dust213–90.0228%22 Feb →
dust26–130.0223%21 Feb →
inferno12–160.0538%20 Feb →
mirage13–40.0727%9 Feb →
mirage14–160.0721%8 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0234%8 Feb →
nuke10–130.0719%8 Feb →
nuke14–16-0.0223%8 Feb →
anubis13–30.1639%8 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.