RumilTalarom — CS2 Stats

76561197963489419[U:1:3223691]

3,501Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,989Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4349 of 16156 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,083 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRumilTalaromFACEITLevel 9 · 2,083 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,989 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning62
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateLWLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression6.5
Utility7.4
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch4.2

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning6.2
Utility7.4
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time571ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 13–2
130Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 56% over 9infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A22121055%0.03
ancientB189950%0.01
nukeB179853%0.00
infernoD124833%0.01
cacheB115645%0.03
anubisC104640%-0.02
mirageA95456%0.00
office110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,445Matches
53%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
80.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust212548%1.0615.1
Ancient12252%1.0715.4
Anubis9143%1.0615.3
Nuke7451%1.1716.2
Inferno7344%1.1416.4
Mirage4240%1.0413.2
Vertigo2854%1.0213.4
Cache1553%1.1515.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
567msReaction time
34.6%T opening success
42.8%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
12.92HE damage / grenade
16.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.566% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–130.0119%26 Aug
dust213–100.0314%26 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0126%26 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0411%25 Aug
mirage13–80.0522%24 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0019%24 Aug
inferno13–100.0437%23 Aug
nuke13–10.1124%21 Aug
cache11–130.0417%21 Aug
mirage11–130.0214%21 Aug
dust28–130.0119%20 Aug
ancient13–80.0515%20 Aug
cache8–130.1024%20 Aug
dust213–70.0922%19 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0322%19 Aug
dust26–13-0.0511%18 Aug
inferno7–130.0113%18 Aug
dust213–9-0.0322%18 Aug
nuke13–110.0421%17 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0511%16 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0311%16 Aug
cache13–110.0423%16 Aug
ancient13–80.089%16 Aug
office13–40.0324%12 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0419%12 Aug
cache14–16-0.0419%12 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0118%11 Aug
mirage9–130.0116%11 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0016%10 Aug
inferno13–00.1021%9 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0513%9 Aug
dust213–160.0124%9 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0117%8 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0212%8 Aug
nuke6–130.0017%8 Aug
ancient13–160.0012%5 Aug
dust213–70.0429%5 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0921%5 Aug
dust28–130.0413%4 Aug
inferno4–130.0021%4 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0220%4 Aug
nuke5–2-0.0343%4 Aug
ancient13–100.0315%4 Aug
mirage16–140.0118%4 Aug
dust24–130.0014%4 Aug
dust213–20.1215%4 Aug
cache13–5-0.0010%4 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0017%3 Aug
cache18–220.0113%3 Aug
dust213–50.0415%3 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0810%2 Aug
ancient7–130.0219%2 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0219%2 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0116%2 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0120%2 Aug
dust213–8-0.0218%2 Aug
inferno10–13-0.059%2 Aug
dust213–10-0.0019%31 Jul
cache16–140.0314%30 Jul
anubis13–70.0621%30 Jul
inferno13–80.0316%30 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0432%30 Jul
ancient10–130.0319%30 Jul
dust29–13-0.0116%30 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0123%30 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0120%29 Jul
inferno12–120.0213%29 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0615%28 Jul
nuke13–60.0017%28 Jul
dust213–50.1122%28 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0613%28 Jul
dust28–13-0.0711%28 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0725%27 Jul
anubis13–90.0032%27 Jul
cache7–13-0.0126%27 Jul
nuke13–80.0320%27 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0118%26 Jul
ancient13–110.0321%26 Jul
anubis13–50.0335%25 Jul
dust213–40.0823%25 Jul
dust27–130.0621%24 Jul
inferno10–130.0228%24 Jul
cache13–20.1616%24 Jul
mirage13–10.0027%24 Jul
dust211–130.1018%23 Jul
dust213–90.0128%22 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0521%22 Jul
ancient13–20.0224%22 Jul
ancient13–60.0530%22 Jul
dust211–130.0241%21 Jul
ancient11–130.0017%21 Jul
anubis11–13-0.067%21 Jul
nuke13–10.0919%21 Jul
cache3–130.0213%18 Jul
inferno13–50.0731%18 Jul
dust213–80.0426%18 Jul
mirage13–60.0317%18 Jul
nuke12–120.0421%18 Jul
cache13–11-0.0120%17 Jul
mirage13–90.0219%17 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →