hazzstr

hazzstr — CS2 Stats

AU76561197961327922[U:1:1062194]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,454Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,584Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#82987 of 259466 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,787 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,000 +1,308 18 May – 1 Jul · 27 days played
17,33120,111peak 20,11118 May1 Jul
20,111Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,787Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2026-05-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,787
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 214 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate63.6%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy10.7%13.2%13.7%3.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.751.071.09above
Match win rate41.3%46.9%48.4%7.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhazzstrFACEITLevel 9 · 1,787 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,787csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning48
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–48–4Last 10048%Win rateLWWLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · −14ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.8
Utility5.1
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time569ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–9 · dust2, 18 Jun →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · mirage, 15 Jun →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 29 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 8 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 61% over 18anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3918–2146%0.02
mirageC187–1139%0.02
infernoA1811–761%0.02
nukeA127–558%0.04
anubisD82–625%0.01
ancientA53–260%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

167,922Lifetime kills
1.75K/D · Top 5% of Level 9 players
3,115Matches
41.3%Match win rate
63.6%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 9 players
10.7%Shot accuracy
14,886MVPs
2,461Hours (in match)
3,868Bombs planted
1,260Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

9,181dust2
5,536inferno
3,807nuke
793train
224vertigo
141cbble
75dust
40office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

738Matches
49%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
73.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust218054%1.3516.2
Mirage16641%1.0914.9
Ancient10742%1.0714.5
Inferno10756%1.1814.6
Anubis6746%1.0713.7
Nuke6359%1.2715.4
Overpass3247%1.0213.7
Vertigo743%1.7317.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
87.0%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
571msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
31.5%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
8.86HE damage / grenade
9.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4513 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.2215% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0526%28 Oct →
dust213–110.019%15 Sept →
mirage13–70.0013%23 Aug →
inferno5–5-0.0225%12 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0615%10 Aug →
anubis10–130.0423%5 Aug →
dust28–130.0818%4 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0321%3 Aug →
dust213–110.0130%3 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0013%2 Aug →
nuke2–130.0318%29 Jul →
inferno13–70.0120%29 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0422%28 Jul →
inferno13–110.0127%27 Jul →
anubis13–20.078%27 Jul →
ancient13–160.0011%27 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0310%26 Jul →
dust213–110.0427%22 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0018%22 Jul →
dust213–70.0612%21 Jul →
ancient13–60.0216%21 Jul →
dust213–70.0229%20 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0326%16 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.127%16 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0510%14 Jul →
dust28–130.0422%14 Jul →
dust213–90.0823%13 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0225%13 Jul →
nuke16–130.0718%12 Jul →
nuke13–90.048%10 Jul →
inferno13–80.0222%9 Jul →
dust28–130.0412%7 Jul →
dust23–100.1014%6 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0217%5 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0123%2 Jul →
dust212–16-0.0315%1 Jul →
ancient13–30.1718%30 Jun →
inferno16–14-0.0018%30 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0230%29 Jun →
inferno13–90.0717%29 Jun →
dust213–100.0037%28 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0617%28 Jun →
nuke10–130.1123%25 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0110%25 Jun →
mirage13–100.0227%24 Jun →
inferno8–130.0719%24 Jun →
dust215–150.0317%23 Jun →
mirage13–50.0427%23 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0321%23 Jun →
dust213–5-0.019%22 Jun →
mirage13–60.0413%22 Jun →
inferno3–13-0.0118%22 Jun →
dust29–130.0530%22 Jun →
dust213–90.1836%18 Jun →
dust213–40.0933%17 Jun →
nuke13–80.0315%17 Jun →
nuke13–30.009%17 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0018%17 Jun →
nuke8–130.0610%16 Jun →
nuke13–5-0.0015%16 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0217%16 Jun →
mirage13–80.0414%16 Jun →
mirage8–130.1214%16 Jun →
mirage11–130.0528%15 Jun →
mirage4–130.0645%15 Jun →
nuke13–110.0413%15 Jun →
dust215–150.0324%14 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0320%14 Jun →
mirage6–130.0117%14 Jun →
dust211–130.0132%11 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0513%11 Jun →
inferno13–90.0518%10 Jun →
nuke7–130.0824%10 Jun →
mirage4–130.1137%9 Jun →
dust23–130.0137%9 Jun →
dust21–13-0.050%9 Jun →
inferno13–90.0530%8 Jun →
inferno13–00.0818%8 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0724%7 Jun →
nuke13–100.0223%7 Jun →
inferno13–90.0539%7 Jun →
inferno13–100.0823%4 Jun →
inferno13–110.0715%3 Jun →
dust214–160.0322%3 Jun →
nuke9–130.0222%1 Jun →
dust213–20.1127%1 Jun →
dust27–130.0722%31 May →
anubis13–100.0313%27 May →
mirage2–13-0.0422%27 May →
mirage5–13-0.0512%26 May →
dust26–130.0519%26 May →
anubis4–13-0.0114%26 May →
dust210–130.0229%25 May →
dust213–110.0714%25 May →
mirage15–150.0816%25 May →
anubis15–150.0122%24 May →
inferno6–13-0.0112%20 May →
dust216–130.0418%20 May →
ancient13–90.0428%20 May →
dust213–80.0524%18 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.