zAp 🍁🖤 — CS2 Stats

BR76561197961064440[U:1:798712]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

614Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating21,115Top 50% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#65783 of 251343 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,115 +6 21 Sept – 11 Oct · 16 days played

23,073Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,394Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

19Days played since 2026-09-21

Premier CS Rating

1,084 below peak (22,199)
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,885 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-21
Purple band first seen 2026-09-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62

Positioning52

Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–36–7Last 10057%Win rateLWWLLWWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · +57ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 475ms

Last 10

6–3–1 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

10–9–1 · 50% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 528ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.2

Utility6.9

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels3.6

Clutch4.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.80 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2

Positioning5.2

Utility6.9

Mechanics4.8

Opening Duels4.1

Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time529ms+34ms

first ⅓ avg 495ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms

Headshot accuracy18.5%−2.3%

first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 4 Oct →

47%Best headshot accuracy · 10–1 · dust2, 9 Oct →

313msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · dust2, 27 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · nuke, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak

10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 52infernoWeakest map · 0% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	52	33–19	63%	-0.00
mirage	A	24	15–9	63%	-0.01
inferno	D	7	0–7	0%	-0.03
ancient	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.03
nuke	—	4	1–3	25%	0.03
cache	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.04
anubis	—	3	3–0	100%	-0.03
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

231Matches

56%Win rate

1.02Avg K/D

71.5ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	23	52%	0.85	12.8
Mirage	13	69%	1.03	14.8
Cache	4	75%	0.94	9.5
Inferno	3	33%	0.99	15.7
Ancient	2	50%	0.86	12.0
Train	2	100%	1.30	15.5
Nuke	2	100%	0.76	14.0
Anubis	2	50%	0.90	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy

31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.6%Spray accuracy

71.5%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

524msReaction time

52.7%T opening success

40.4%CT opening success

0.80Enemies flashed / flash

6.9%Flash assists

9.10HE damage / grenade

14.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	6–13	-0.04	27%	11 Oct →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	19%	11 Oct →
nuke	13–1	0.07	15%	11 Oct →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	13%	10 Oct →
inferno	9–13	-0.06	16%	10 Oct →
cache	13–11	0.01	10%	9 Oct →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	8%	9 Oct →
dust2	10–1	0.04	47%	9 Oct →
dust2	12–12	-0.06	15%	8 Oct →
mirage	13–6	0.08	14%	7 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	15%	7 Oct →
mirage	13–6	0.02	8%	7 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.11	8%	7 Oct →
dust2	14–16	-0.04	18%	7 Oct →
ancient	8–13	-0.07	6%	6 Oct →
inferno	13–16	0.02	10%	6 Oct →
dust2	8–13	0.03	23%	5 Oct →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	13%	5 Oct →
dust2	16–14	0.02	26%	5 Oct →
ancient	10–13	-0.07	16%	5 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.08	16%	5 Oct →
dust2	13–16	0.05	25%	5 Oct →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	28%	5 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	22%	5 Oct →
inferno	7–13	-0.00	14%	4 Oct →
mirage	10–13	0.01	12%	4 Oct →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	13%	4 Oct →
nuke	9–13	0.02	26%	4 Oct →
dust2	13–1	0.20	24%	4 Oct →
ancient	13–10	0.07	20%	4 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.06	17%	4 Oct →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	29%	4 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.03	35%	4 Oct →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	16%	4 Oct →
cache	0–13	-0.07	0%	4 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	18%	4 Oct →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	6%	3 Oct →
cache	13–7	-0.04	19%	3 Oct →
dust2	13–1	-0.03	23%	3 Oct →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	24%	3 Oct →
dust2	13–3	-0.03	20%	3 Oct →
dust2	13–2	-0.03	12%	3 Oct →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	12%	3 Oct →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	12%	3 Oct →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	19%	3 Oct →
cache	0–13	-0.07	21%	3 Oct →
mirage	13–1	0.00	26%	3 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	23%	2 Oct →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	21%	1 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.01	14%	1 Oct →
mirage	13–9	0.02	14%	1 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.01	26%	1 Oct →
mirage	12–12	-0.07	15%	1 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.06	23%	1 Oct →
mirage	13–2	0.03	26%	1 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	7%	30 Sept →
dust2	13–6	0.03	23%	30 Sept →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	25%	30 Sept →
nuke	14–16	0.02	20%	30 Sept →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	24%	30 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	11%	29 Sept →
nuke	2–13	-0.00	14%	29 Sept →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	19%	29 Sept →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	24%	29 Sept →
dust2	13–4	0.04	22%	29 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.04	21%	29 Sept →
mirage	13–11	0.03	26%	29 Sept →
dust2	15–15	-0.04	29%	29 Sept →
dust2	9–1	-0.02	0%	29 Sept →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	29%	29 Sept →
dust2	13–4	0.01	36%	28 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.13	17%	28 Sept →
dust2	1–13	-0.08	25%	28 Sept →
dust2	8–13	0.02	20%	28 Sept →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	15%	28 Sept →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	24%	28 Sept →
dust2	12–12	-0.08	23%	28 Sept →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	26%	28 Sept →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	27%	27 Sept →
anubis	13–6	0.02	15%	27 Sept →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	27%	27 Sept →
dust2	12–12	0.02	17%	27 Sept →
mirage	3–13	0.00	16%	27 Sept →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	23%	27 Sept →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	25%	26 Sept →
vertigo	13–2	-0.05	18%	26 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	13%	26 Sept →
anubis	13–11	-0.08	9%	26 Sept →
mirage	13–1	0.01	23%	26 Sept →
dust2	13–4	-0.06	45%	25 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.01	22%	25 Sept →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	17%	25 Sept →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	26%	25 Sept →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	11%	24 Sept →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	13%	24 Sept →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	18%	24 Sept →
dust2	12–12	0.04	37%	23 Sept →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	6%	23 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.08	13%	23 Sept →
dust2	7–13	0.04	21%	23 Sept →