Gmtz

Gmtz — CS2 Stats

JP76561198045782680[U:1:85516952]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,290Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,175Top 50% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#51977 of 251328 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,622 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,175 -1,601 6 Sept – 10 Oct · 28 days played
21,86325,110peak 25,1106 Sept10 Oct
25,443Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,622Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-09-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,622
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 129 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,935 below peak (25,110)
  • -1,454 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,825 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGmtzFACEITLevel 6 · 1,622 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,175 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,622csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning40
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55–42–3Last 10055%Win rateWLLWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.4pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility6.0
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 55 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning4.0
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time529ms−83ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 14 Sept →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · mirage, 28 Sept →
328msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · dust2, 21 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3721–1657%0.01
mirageA3118–1358%0.00
infernoB105–550%0.03
ancientD72–529%0.00
nukeB63–350%0.04
cacheS65–183%0.04
anubis—31–233%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

627Matches
47%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
85.8ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust219756%1.2417.5
Ancient11748%1.1317.3
Inferno9338%1.1116.8
Mirage9141%1.0717.4
Nuke8345%1.2819.4
Train2548%1.2518.2
Overpass1155%1.1418.1
Anubis617%1.3416.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy
40.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.3%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
7.0°Preaim
523msReaction time
33.7%T opening success
19.8%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
6.44HE damage / grenade
10.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.6585% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–70.0731%10 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0318%10 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0123%10 Oct →
inferno13–40.1625%10 Oct →
mirage11–130.0419%10 Oct →
dust213–70.0847%9 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0118%9 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0524%9 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0320%8 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0123%6 Oct →
dust28–130.0344%5 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0110%5 Oct →
dust213–160.0120%5 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0223%5 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0719%4 Oct →
ancient12–10.0210%4 Oct →
cache10–130.0315%3 Oct →
inferno13–00.1012%3 Oct →
mirage8–130.0122%3 Oct →
inferno5–130.0529%3 Oct →
ancient7–130.0329%3 Oct →
inferno13–60.0232%3 Oct →
dust213–60.0119%2 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0416%2 Oct →
cache13–80.0119%1 Oct →
nuke13–100.0327%30 Sept →
inferno7–130.0238%29 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0215%29 Sept →
dust213–40.0631%29 Sept →
mirage13–70.0234%29 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0314%29 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0118%28 Sept →
cache13–30.1318%28 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0119%28 Sept →
mirage13–80.0047%28 Sept →
dust213–70.0630%27 Sept →
anubis13–60.0412%27 Sept →
dust24–130.0232%27 Sept →
mirage13–110.0014%27 Sept →
nuke9–130.0331%27 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0114%26 Sept →
mirage2–130.0131%26 Sept →
dust213–80.1023%26 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0228%26 Sept →
dust213–110.0322%26 Sept →
mirage13–70.0937%26 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0120%25 Sept →
mirage13–00.0019%25 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0218%25 Sept →
dust213–70.0218%25 Sept →
mirage13–90.019%25 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0326%25 Sept →
nuke10–130.0530%25 Sept →
cache13–20.0717%25 Sept →
nuke10–130.0229%25 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0418%24 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0214%24 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0124%23 Sept →
dust213–60.0120%23 Sept →
mirage13–110.0222%23 Sept →
dust213–80.1129%23 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0320%23 Sept →
dust21–11-0.0218%22 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0623%22 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0543%21 Sept →
mirage13–10.0215%21 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0619%21 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0216%21 Sept →
dust27–130.0017%20 Sept →
dust213–20.0129%20 Sept →
inferno13–110.0527%18 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0733%18 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0329%18 Sept →
mirage8–130.0116%18 Sept →
dust213–100.0337%18 Sept →
mirage15–150.0321%17 Sept →
mirage13–90.0925%17 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0318%16 Sept →
cache13–60.0424%16 Sept →
dust213–70.0022%15 Sept →
dust213–100.0228%15 Sept →
dust215–150.0129%15 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0418%14 Sept →
dust213–40.1621%14 Sept →
mirage13–70.0411%14 Sept →
nuke13–70.0633%14 Sept →
dust214–160.0726%13 Sept →
ancient11–130.0628%13 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0314%13 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0024%13 Sept →
mirage10–130.0030%13 Sept →
dust24–130.0331%13 Sept →
mirage13–10.0214%12 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0728%12 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0219%12 Sept →
mirage4–00.0640%12 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0124%12 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0621%12 Sept →
dust213–80.0419%11 Sept →
mirage6–130.0213%11 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.