ALIG

ALIG — CS2 Stats

GB76561197960933814[U:1:668086]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

708Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating27,528Top 5% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3467 of 221163 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 708 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 9 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,528 +8,032 20 Feb13 Sept · 30 days played
19,49627,528peak 27,52820 Feb13 Sept
27,631Peak Premier in tracked matches
48Days played since 2026-02-09

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 27,528
  • +339 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,472 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGALIGPREMIER27,528 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning57
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54433Last 10054%Win rateLWWLLTLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · −130ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility6.9
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.7
Utility6.9
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time559ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 18 May
47%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · mirage, 2 Mar
406msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · mirage, 19 Jul
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 2 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
104In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 70% over 10nukeWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B31151648%-0.00
mirageB1910953%-0.01
ancientA127558%-0.01
nukeB115645%0.02
infernoB115645%0.01
cacheS107370%0.01
anubis330100%0.06
overpass32167%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,281Matches
54%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
81.1ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23959%1.1515.9
Mirage3259%1.0816.4
Inferno2055%1.0417.6
Nuke1354%1.1916.6
Ancient1136%0.9514.2
Cache967%1.0514.8
Anubis933%0.7713.1
Overpass786%1.0116.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
549msReaction time
34.6%T opening success
54.7%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
9.88HE damage / grenade
16.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.594% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0517%29 Aug
dust213–5-0.098%29 Aug
dust213–40.0433%20 Aug
dust21–13-0.0517%20 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0045%15 Aug
dust215–15-0.0015%15 Aug
dust211–13-0.0430%15 Aug
mirage16–140.0128%15 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0525%12 Aug
inferno13–110.0422%12 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0313%8 Aug
mirage13–20.0416%2 Aug
cache13–9-0.0219%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.0325%2 Aug
cache13–70.0427%2 Aug
inferno7–130.0618%2 Aug
dust26–130.0229%31 Jul
cache7–13-0.0536%26 Jul
cache10–13-0.0224%24 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0418%24 Jul
mirage13–80.0021%19 Jul
mirage13–50.0920%18 Jul
cache13–30.0532%18 Jul
dust213–100.0418%18 Jul
anubis13–30.0925%17 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0715%17 Jul
cache13–5-0.059%12 Jul
cache7–130.0717%26 Jun
dust213–100.0213%27 May
inferno5–13-0.0223%26 May
inferno17–19-0.0214%25 May
mirage13–6-0.0712%25 May
nuke7–13-0.0720%23 May
ancient13–10-0.0316%19 May
ancient16–14-0.0231%19 May
nuke13–50.1320%18 May
nuke8–130.0233%18 May
dust24–13-0.0233%18 May
cache13–110.0519%11 May
dust210–130.0019%8 May
nuke5–130.0129%8 May
overpass13–2-0.0419%8 May
cache16–130.0723%4 May
dust213–50.0729%4 May
cache13–70.0114%4 May
nuke3–80.0610%26 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0220%25 Apr
dust213–80.0223%19 Apr
dust28–130.0130%12 Apr
dust213–80.0826%12 Apr
dust23–130.0521%11 Apr
dust24–9-0.0636%6 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0220%6 Apr
dust213–90.0521%5 Apr
dust27–13-0.0126%4 Apr
mirage13–50.0023%4 Apr
dust213–6-0.0518%4 Apr
anubis13–70.1121%29 Mar
inferno11–130.0024%28 Mar
dust213–80.1018%28 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0317%27 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0227%27 Mar
ancient13–30.0513%26 Mar
mirage13–90.0630%26 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0313%23 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0710%23 Mar
dust213–11-0.0228%15 Mar
ancient6–130.0126%14 Mar
nuke16–140.0431%14 Mar
dust213–6-0.0221%14 Mar
mirage0–10-0.0713%7 Mar
mirage4–130.0047%2 Mar
ancient13–70.0919%2 Mar
anubis16–14-0.0120%1 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0422%1 Mar
mirage15–150.0424%1 Mar
dust24–130.0035%1 Mar
inferno13–50.0529%1 Mar
overpass5–13-0.0631%28 Feb
inferno16–140.0132%28 Feb
mirage9–13-0.038%28 Feb
dust213–10-0.0135%28 Feb
ancient16–120.0223%28 Feb
nuke13–70.0819%21 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0316%21 Feb
nuke13–90.0417%20 Feb
dust213–80.0625%20 Feb
ancient13–90.0421%20 Feb
mirage13–50.0122%20 Feb
nuke6–130.0034%20 Feb
mirage11–130.0722%17 Feb
dust215–15-0.0129%15 Feb
mirage10–13-0.1222%15 Feb
dust22–13-0.0614%15 Feb
inferno13–60.0715%15 Feb
dust22–13-0.0733%15 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0124%15 Feb
dust213–70.0125%14 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0315%14 Feb
dust28–13-0.0216%9 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →