Brew.

Brew. — CS2 Stats

76561198082467625[U:1:122201897]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,651Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,695Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#78511 of 221493 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 19,695 → 19,695
0Faceit ELO · 1,419 → 1,419
+8Tracked matches · now 1,651
−3.3ppWin rate · 60.0% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 21 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,695 +4,695 21 Feb4 Sept · 23 days played
12,19919,917peak 19,91721 Feb4 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,419 +0 30 Aug4 Sept · 4 observations
1,4191,419peak 1,41930 Aug4 Sept
19,917Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,419Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-02-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,419
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 112 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 222 below peak (19,917)
  • +277 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 305 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBrew.PREMIER19,695 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,419csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning44
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40573Last 10040%Win rateLLWWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · +40ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility5.8
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning4.4
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time605ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 9–13 · mirage, 22 Feb
32%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · ancient, 24 Mar
453msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · dust2, 20 Jul
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 2 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
811In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 54% over 13dust2Weakest map · 29% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2281436%-0.01
dust2D2161529%-0.04
infernoB168850%-0.02
ancientB137654%-0.01
cacheC83538%-0.04
nukeC83538%-0.01
anubisC73443%-0.00
train21150%-0.01
overpass2020%-0.05
fachwerk110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

935Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
74.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15550%1.0714.6
Dust29751%1.0413.9
Inferno8857%0.9613.5
Nuke5648%1.0614.5
Ancient5555%1.0915.4
Anubis5343%0.9614.5
Overpass2552%0.9114.6
Train1669%1.2314.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
606msReaction time
39.6%T opening success
37.0%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
8.87HE damage / grenade
6.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.6248% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–130.0114%13 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0425%12 Sept
ancient13–110.0118%4 Sept
inferno13–80.0718%4 Sept
fachwerk13–5-0.0610%26 Aug
train13–100.0110%26 Aug
dust211–13-0.0822%15 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0112%15 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0120%2 Aug
dust211–13-0.0118%22 Jul
cache11–13-0.0315%21 Jul
cache13–4-0.0823%20 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0029%20 Jul
cache3–13-0.0423%20 Jul
dust26–13-0.0825%20 Jul
mirage13–80.0315%19 Jul
dust26–13-0.0412%19 Jul
mirage7–130.0123%19 Jul
mirage13–110.0218%18 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0414%17 Jul
dust213–10-0.0222%17 Jul
dust213–4-0.0412%17 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0112%17 Jul
cache13–10-0.0412%17 Jul
mirage13–30.023%17 Jul
mirage16–140.0317%15 Jul
dust212–16-0.0825%14 Jul
dust23–13-0.0714%13 Jul
nuke13–90.0128%13 Jul
inferno13–9-0.029%13 Jul
anubis13–100.0210%13 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0525%13 Jul
cache3–13-0.0227%9 Jul
mirage13–60.0111%3 Jul
cache7–13-0.0319%26 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0823%14 Jun
mirage12–160.0123%4 Jun
anubis13–20.0416%2 Jun
dust213–100.0223%30 May
nuke3–130.0626%30 May
mirage6–13-0.0521%30 May
mirage15–15-0.0315%28 May
nuke11–13-0.0717%28 May
dust27–13-0.0829%22 May
cache5–13-0.0713%18 May
train12–12-0.0232%8 May
cache13–60.0024%8 May
mirage11–13-0.0524%3 May
ancient13–90.0117%2 May
dust26–13-0.0625%20 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0225%20 Apr
dust23–13-0.0910%31 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0510%30 Mar
dust27–13-0.1217%30 Mar
anubis13–70.0312%29 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0119%29 Mar
dust25–130.0410%29 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0413%29 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0617%29 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0210%28 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0710%28 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0321%28 Mar
inferno11–13-0.036%28 Mar
dust213–8-0.0317%28 Mar
ancient5–130.0014%28 Mar
inferno13–11-0.1016%28 Mar
dust24–13-0.0119%28 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0112%28 Mar
dust211–13-0.0313%25 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0520%25 Mar
dust213–20.0712%25 Mar
inferno13–70.0331%25 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0710%25 Mar
ancient13–110.0326%24 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0221%24 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0232%24 Mar
inferno13–16-0.0414%24 Mar
overpass14–16-0.0114%23 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0310%23 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0122%23 Mar
nuke6–130.0116%23 Mar
dust28–13-0.0516%23 Mar
dust25–130.0121%22 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0227%22 Mar
ancient13–70.0031%21 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0124%15 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0212%8 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0111%28 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0811%28 Feb
anubis6–130.0413%28 Feb
nuke13–50.0212%27 Feb
inferno4–130.0112%23 Feb
nuke16–14-0.0418%22 Feb
inferno7–130.0125%22 Feb
dust213–80.0011%22 Feb
mirage9–130.1014%22 Feb
overpass8–13-0.1014%22 Feb
inferno6–13-0.095%21 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0723%21 Feb
ancient13–60.0321%21 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →