Bardolino

Bardolino — CS2 Stats

HK76561197960583474[U:1:317746]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,050Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,762Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,690Top 50% of 204,056 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#70886 of 251136 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,897 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,690 -394 21 Aug – 8 Oct · 33 days played
19,44423,713peak 23,71321 Aug8 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,897 +0 30 Aug – 22 Sept · 9 observations
1,8971,897peak 1,89730 Aug22 Sept
24,064Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,897Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-08-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,897
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 104 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,023 below peak (23,713)
  • -3,017 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,310 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches66——
Win rate47%——
K/D1.80——
Headshot %60%——

Measured 8 Sep 2026 → 9 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,332), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate46.6%48.2%50.9%4.4% short
Shot accuracy14.3%13.3%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.361.071.09above
Match win rate46.4%46.9%48.4%2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBardolinoFACEITLevel 9 · 1,897 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,690 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,897csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning66
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateLLWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +4.9pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility6.6
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning6.6
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time579ms+28ms
first ⅓ avg 550ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–9 · anubis, 11 Sept →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 5 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 2–7 · nuke, 5 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 68% over 28mirageWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2819–968%0.02
infernoC208–1240%-0.01
nukeB179–853%0.01
ancientB136–746%-0.02
mirageD102–820%-0.00
anubisB63–350%0.02
cacheA53–260%-0.01
office—10–10%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

182,423Lifetime kills
1.36K/D · Top 10% of Level 9 players
6,314Matches
46.4%Match win rate
46.6%Headshot %
14.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
16,883MVPs
2,762Hours (in match)
8,487Bombs planted
2,007Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,455
AWP18,890
P2507,195
P905,132
Negev2,728

Lifetime map wins

13,427dust2
10,399inferno
5,264nuke
1,948train
1,135vertigo
962cbble
194dust
177lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

631Matches
53%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
86.0ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust29157%1.3218.5
Mirage6655%1.0715.1
Inferno6656%1.4317.9
Ancient6240%1.1816.1
Anubis4243%1.1416.5
Nuke4257%1.3418.4
Vertigo2025%0.9917.8
Train1759%1.2518.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
584msReaction time
35.2%T opening success
45.4%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
12.35HE damage / grenade
8.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.228% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0216%8 Oct →
nuke8–130.0334%8 Oct →
nuke16–130.0415%8 Oct →
ancient13–70.0816%8 Oct →
dust213–60.1019%6 Oct →
nuke13–100.0312%5 Oct →
dust213–60.0039%5 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0013%5 Oct →
nuke2–70.0016%5 Oct →
ancient14–160.0217%5 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0020%28 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0119%28 Sept →
nuke13–20.0615%28 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0625%28 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0112%28 Sept →
nuke13–160.0011%28 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0112%27 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.048%26 Sept →
inferno13–60.0514%26 Sept →
dust213–100.0912%26 Sept →
dust213–100.0116%26 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0120%26 Sept →
inferno13–90.0740%26 Sept →
anubis13–70.0527%26 Sept →
dust216–130.0012%25 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.0615%25 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0321%25 Sept →
inferno13–90.0919%25 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0213%24 Sept →
mirage8–130.0423%24 Sept →
dust213–110.0217%24 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0217%23 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.050%22 Sept →
nuke9–130.0133%21 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0426%21 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0926%21 Sept →
office12–120.0017%21 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0421%21 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0616%21 Sept →
nuke10–130.0025%18 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0414%18 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0415%15 Sept →
mirage6–130.0115%15 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0313%15 Sept →
dust213–80.0126%14 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0614%14 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.0924%12 Sept →
anubis13–90.1319%11 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0025%7 Sept →
cache15–150.0121%7 Sept →
inferno13–80.0518%7 Sept →
nuke13–110.1117%7 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0118%7 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0418%7 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0018%6 Sept →
mirage8–40.0622%6 Sept →
dust213–80.0627%5 Sept →
inferno13–20.0326%5 Sept →
dust29–130.0726%5 Sept →
dust213–20.0142%5 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.1619%5 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0122%5 Sept →
dust213–40.0313%3 Sept →
dust213–60.1220%2 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0318%2 Sept →
dust213–70.0116%2 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0122%31 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0124%31 Aug →
mirage13–50.0516%31 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.018%31 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0122%29 Aug →
inferno5–130.0028%29 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0411%28 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0721%28 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0615%28 Aug →
dust213–70.1024%28 Aug →
nuke13–80.0214%27 Aug →
dust213–80.0420%27 Aug →
dust27–130.003%27 Aug →
inferno13–60.0126%27 Aug →
inferno11–130.0115%26 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0315%26 Aug →
dust23–130.0214%26 Aug →
inferno7–130.0416%26 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0314%25 Aug →
dust213–60.0720%24 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0327%24 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0618%24 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0610%24 Aug →
cache13–100.0210%24 Aug →
anubis13–50.0214%23 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0112%23 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0417%22 Aug →
inferno13–70.0117%22 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0428%22 Aug →
dust213–110.0323%21 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0513%21 Aug →
ancient13–60.0216%21 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0118%21 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0226%21 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.