aam

aam — CS2 Stats

CA76561197960419379[U:1:153651]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,771Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,910Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,545 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (48 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,771 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

1,545Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-06-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,545
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 206 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,220), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate77.7%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.7%13.0%13.0% short
Kill/death ratio3.261.051.06above
Match win rate40.5%45.7%46.3%5.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaamFACEITLevel 7 · 1,545 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,545csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning58
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–53Last 10047%Win rateWLLWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −9.6pp headshot accuracy · −7ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility4.3
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.8
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time544ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–11 · dust2, 27 Jun →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · cache, 24 Aug →
383msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · mirage, 19 Aug →
13–3Biggest win · dust2, 11 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 15dust2Weakest map · 32% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3116–1552%-0.01
dust2D258–1732%-0.01
nukeA159–660%0.01
anubisB126–650%-0.02
ancientC73–443%-0.02
inferno—42–250%0.00
cache—41–325%0.00
overpass—22–0100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

233,810Lifetime kills
3.26K/D · Top 1% of Level 7 players
2,357Matches
40.5%Match win rate
77.7%Headshot % · Top 1% of Level 7 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
4,235MVPs
1,910Hours (in match)
2,037Bombs planted
910Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47130,561
AWP5,833
MP92,481
FAMAS2,074
MAC-101,622

Lifetime map wins

3,078inferno
3,031dust2
2,767nuke
1,532vertigo
296train
47office
12italy
3ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

852Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
76.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22352%0.9814.7
Dust213847%0.9314.4
Ancient11748%0.9815.3
Inferno10642%0.9414.4
Nuke10047%1.0015.5
Anubis8954%0.9815.4
Vertigo4564%1.1015.7
Overpass1867%0.9214.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
529msReaction time
38.4%T opening success
56.0%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
9.98HE damage / grenade
6.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.4114% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–11-0.0417%27 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0914%27 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0817%27 Aug →
nuke22–18-0.0020%26 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0513%26 Aug →
mirage13–100.0220%26 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.113%26 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0626%26 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.079%26 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0111%25 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0332%25 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0229%25 Aug →
mirage13–40.0615%24 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0215%24 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0313%24 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0216%24 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0141%24 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0023%20 Aug →
dust213–100.0731%19 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0128%19 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0516%19 Aug →
mirage13–100.0912%19 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0719%19 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0024%17 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0124%17 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0215%17 Aug →
mirage13–60.0120%11 Aug →
dust29–130.0115%10 Aug →
nuke19–160.0428%20 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0217%20 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0416%20 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0222%20 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0514%16 Jul →
nuke13–60.0723%13 Jul →
anubis13–40.0215%13 Jul →
cache13–100.0523%13 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0111%13 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0123%13 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0224%7 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0611%7 Jul →
mirage13–70.0919%7 Jul →
dust26–13-0.1019%7 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0318%7 Jul →
nuke13–80.0126%7 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0120%7 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0123%5 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0415%5 Jul →
dust210–130.0520%2 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0318%2 Jul →
mirage13–70.0318%2 Jul →
dust210–130.0729%1 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0715%1 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0714%30 Jun →
anubis13–110.0122%30 Jun →
mirage13–40.0724%30 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.0116%30 Jun →
dust22–13-0.0522%30 Jun →
mirage13–7-0.0517%30 Jun →
ancient16–140.0415%30 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.056%30 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.060%30 Jun →
nuke13–100.0510%30 Jun →
dust213–110.1115%27 Jun →
cache10–13-0.0223%27 Jun →
cache9–13-0.0131%26 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0325%26 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0127%26 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0713%25 Jun →
inferno13–100.0417%23 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0315%23 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0115%23 Jun →
mirage9–130.0115%23 Jun →
overpass13–70.009%23 Jun →
dust210–130.0113%23 Jun →
nuke10–130.0135%23 Jun →
anubis11–130.0614%22 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0120%22 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.018%22 Jun →
anubis13–8-0.0425%22 Jun →
dust27–13-0.007%22 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0316%22 Jun →
nuke13–50.0914%22 Jun →
mirage16–13-0.0021%22 Jun →
overpass16–130.0017%17 Jun →
mirage2–13-0.0824%17 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.0513%17 Jun →
mirage0–10-0.0423%16 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0312%12 Jun →
nuke20–220.0611%12 Jun →
ancient10–130.0116%11 Jun →
dust213–30.0127%11 Jun →
nuke13–16-0.0121%11 Jun →
mirage13–40.0214%11 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0138%11 Jun →
mirage1–13-0.1119%11 Jun →
dust211–130.0616%11 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.065%11 Jun →
mirage8–130.0517%11 Jun →
anubis13–70.0319%10 Jun →
ancient13–6-0.0717%10 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.