JC

JC — CS2 Stats

76561197960394588[U:1:128860]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,153Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating16,509Purple band · top ~22.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3 · 779 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,509 -2,911 2 Sept – 4 Nov · 28 days played
16,50920,117peak 20,1172 Sept4 Nov
Faceit ELO: 779 +0 2 Sept – 6 Sept · 3 observations
779779peak 7792 Sept6 Sept
20,117Peak Premier in tracked matches
779Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 779
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 122 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,608 below peak (20,117)
  • -3,491 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,491 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJCFACEITLevel 3 · 779 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER16,509 · Purple bandPEAK ELO779csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning58
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–48–5Last 10047%Win rateLTWTLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +4.9pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–2–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 3–5–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Last 20

  • 6–11–3 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility6.2
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 55% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.8
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact1.9

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time618ms+40ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–1 · vertigo, 23 Oct →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · nuke, 26 Oct →
414msFastest reaction time · 9–1 · vertigo, 23 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 25 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 14dust2Weakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2111–1052%0.00
mirageA149–564%-0.02
cacheA148–657%-0.00
dust2D133–1023%-0.01
infernoC114–736%-0.01
nukeB115–645%-0.04
anubisD93–633%-0.03
poseidon—22–0100%0.12
vertigo—22–0100%0.21
overpass—10–10%-0.06
debris—10–10%-0.18
train—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

181Matches
46%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
62.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient450%0.9812.8
Mirage425%0.549.3
Train250%0.8810.5
Nuke1100%2.0022.0
Inferno10%0.7115.0
Anubis1100%0.5610.0
Overpass1100%1.6213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
73.2%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
598msReaction time
55.4%T opening success
39.6%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
6.35HE damage / grenade
10.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.6423% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage14–16-0.0539%4 Nov →
inferno15–15-0.0215%3 Nov →
mirage13–110.0118%3 Nov →
dust215–15-0.0227%3 Nov →
overpass6–9-0.0627%3 Nov →
poseidon9–10.1228%3 Nov →
vertigo9–50.0829%3 Nov →
inferno2–9-0.1913%3 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0115%3 Nov →
nuke11–13-0.0426%2 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.0218%2 Nov →
cache11–13-0.0112%2 Nov →
nuke13–50.0229%2 Nov →
ancient15–150.0117%1 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.027%1 Nov →
cache6–13-0.0519%1 Nov →
ancient13–7-0.0516%1 Nov →
anubis3–13-0.0832%1 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0623%1 Nov →
mirage13–100.0615%31 Oct →
ancient13–40.0517%31 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0317%31 Oct →
mirage16–12-0.0623%31 Oct →
ancient13–90.0514%31 Oct →
cache13–80.0016%31 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0418%31 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0212%31 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0523%31 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.1017%31 Oct →
debris1–9-0.1820%31 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0123%30 Oct →
dust212–160.0023%30 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0435%29 Oct →
mirage6–130.0245%29 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0920%28 Oct →
ancient16–12-0.0215%28 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0219%26 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0419%26 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0026%26 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0545%26 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0225%25 Oct →
mirage13–100.0120%25 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0324%25 Oct →
ancient13–10.0924%25 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.029%25 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0427%25 Oct →
mirage13–40.0223%25 Oct →
dust26–130.0128%24 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0123%24 Oct →
cache10–1-0.0316%24 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0111%23 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0422%23 Oct →
inferno13–20.0421%23 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0217%23 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0424%23 Oct →
poseidon9–20.1235%23 Oct →
nuke9–30.0330%23 Oct →
vertigo9–10.3434%23 Oct →
inferno9–20.0833%23 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0523%22 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0217%21 Oct →
ancient15–150.0315%21 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0210%21 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0419%20 Oct →
mirage13–110.0217%20 Oct →
cache8–130.0217%20 Oct →
ancient13–100.0231%20 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0113%19 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0420%19 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0922%19 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0217%19 Oct →
dust215–15-0.059%18 Oct →
ancient13–70.0515%18 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0918%18 Oct →
ancient13–80.0024%17 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0313%17 Oct →
cache13–110.0424%17 Oct →
dust213–40.1126%17 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0115%17 Oct →
inferno6–130.0225%16 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0531%16 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0629%16 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0118%15 Oct →
inferno13–90.0726%15 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0113%15 Oct →
cache11–130.0323%14 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0421%14 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0819%14 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0018%13 Oct →
cache13–40.0423%13 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0319%13 Oct →
dust213–30.1116%12 Oct →
ancient11–130.0218%12 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0014%11 Oct →
inferno13–1-0.0112%11 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0120%11 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0611%11 Oct →
cache13–60.1214%11 Oct →
train10–13-0.0126%11 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0520%10 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.