NORMAL HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

NORMAL HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH — CS2 Stats

76561197960392581[U:1:126853]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

1,878Tracked matches56%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,043Top 50% of 213,740 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#82775 of 260208 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,013 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,043 +3,345 22 Sept – 3 Nov · 21 days played
15,25320,469peak 20,46922 Sept3 Nov
20,469Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,013Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-09-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,013
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 38 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-22
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-22

Premier CS Rating

  • 426 below peak (20,469)
  • +2,184 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,957 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-22
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNORMAL HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHFACEITLevel 4 · 1,013 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER20,043 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,013csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning46
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–39–8Last 10053%Win rateTWTWLWWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–1–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 4–3–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 20

  • 10–6–4 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.8 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility6.6
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.6
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact7.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time537ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 536ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy14.4%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 17 Oct →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · cache, 11 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · ancient, 31 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 22 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 12dust2Weakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2313–1057%-0.00
cacheS1712–571%0.01
dust2D155–1033%-0.01
infernoD124–833%0.01
mirageS129–375%-0.01
nukeB115–645%0.01
anubisA95–456%0.02
train—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
75%Win rate
1.43Avg K/D
77.5ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Overpass1100%2.6013.0
Train1100%0.9211.0
Mirage10%1.0618.0
Ancient1100%1.148.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
535msReaction time
29.8%T opening success
40.3%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
9.72HE damage / grenade
15.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4427% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.8119% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno15–150.0614%3 Nov →
mirage13–11-0.0220%3 Nov →
dust215–150.0218%3 Nov →
nuke13–50.0510%3 Nov →
mirage7–13-0.009%3 Nov →
mirage16–130.0113%3 Nov →
dust213–20.0017%3 Nov →
nuke11–13-0.0213%2 Nov →
ancient15–15-0.075%1 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0213%1 Nov →
cache6–130.0117%1 Nov →
ancient13–70.0116%1 Nov →
anubis3–13-0.002%1 Nov →
dust26–13-0.1019%1 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0315%31 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.036%31 Oct →
nuke13–60.0419%31 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0214%31 Oct →
mirage16–12-0.0516%31 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0213%31 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0222%31 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0115%31 Oct →
cache13–110.0320%31 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0011%31 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0214%31 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0516%29 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0119%28 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0310%28 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0121%28 Oct →
ancient16–120.0013%28 Oct →
nuke13–110.0319%25 Oct →
mirage13–100.0316%25 Oct →
dust29–130.0411%25 Oct →
ancient13–10.0314%25 Oct →
anubis13–80.0026%25 Oct →
cache13–6-0.063%25 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.045%25 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0715%24 Oct →
inferno8–130.0621%24 Oct →
cache10–10.069%24 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0825%23 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0110%23 Oct →
inferno13–20.0321%23 Oct →
mirage13–90.0620%23 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0526%23 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0614%22 Oct →
mirage13–80.0121%22 Oct →
cache13–0-0.0013%22 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0620%22 Oct →
cache13–110.1015%21 Oct →
ancient15–150.1018%21 Oct →
anubis7–130.0316%21 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0417%18 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0020%18 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0214%18 Oct →
ancient13–80.0718%17 Oct →
nuke13–70.1314%17 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0110%17 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0221%17 Oct →
dust213–50.0630%17 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0717%17 Oct →
dust213–110.0215%17 Oct →
anubis13–00.0516%17 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0118%17 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0319%14 Oct →
anubis16–14-0.0111%14 Oct →
anubis13–30.0616%14 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0211%14 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.048%14 Oct →
nuke8–130.0215%14 Oct →
dust28–130.0215%13 Oct →
cache13–40.0810%13 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0114%13 Oct →
inferno9–130.0119%11 Oct →
inferno13–10.118%11 Oct →
ancient13–80.0410%11 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0410%11 Oct →
cache13–60.0037%11 Oct →
train10–13-0.0711%11 Oct →
anubis14–160.0118%10 Oct →
cache8–13-0.098%10 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0411%10 Oct →
cache13–110.0828%10 Oct →
cache13–70.0316%10 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0111%10 Oct →
inferno8–80.0627%10 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0610%9 Oct →
dust216–120.0512%9 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0715%9 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0115%9 Oct →
ancient6–130.0217%4 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0815%4 Oct →
anubis13–110.0210%3 Oct →
cache13–110.0622%3 Oct →
ancient13–70.0413%3 Oct →
nuke13–90.089%3 Oct →
dust211–130.0023%3 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.043%3 Oct →
ancient13–40.0412%3 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0411%3 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.