Trinkiedink

Trinkiedink — CS2 Stats

GB76561197960348552[U:1:82824]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

73Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAll-Rounder
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,649 -195 17 Sept – 20 Sept · 4 days played
9,64910,113peak 10,11317 Sept20 Sept
10,113Peak Premier in tracked matches
21Days played since 2023-08-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning53
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38–28–5Last 7154%Win rateWWWWTWWTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–0–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 10

  • 6–2–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Last 20

  • 12–5–3 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 632ms

Newest first, from the last 71 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.0
Utility5.0
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.3

Strong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 643ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.3
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact8.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time652ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 652ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 71 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 16–12 · inferno, 7 Aug →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · inferno, 1 Sept →
492msFastest reaction time · 6–0 · inferno, 1 Sept →
16–2Biggest win · overpass, 8 Aug →

Across the last 71 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
3–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
28Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 21mirageWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2113–862%0.03
mirageC114–736%0.03
overpassA116–555%0.02
ancientB105–550%0.03
vertigoA95–456%0.03
dust2—43–175%0.04
anubis—31–233%0.00
train—11–0100%-0.01
office—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 71 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.3%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
643msReaction time
39.6%T opening success
34.9%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
11.4%Flash assists
11.57HE damage / grenade
2.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.3886 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.6136% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–40.0215%27 Mar →
dust213–40.0113%27 Mar →
mirage13–100.0513%27 Mar →
overpass13–10-0.0114%27 Mar →
anubis15–150.0715%11 Jul →
inferno16–13-0.0014%3 Mar →
dust213–00.0425%3 Mar →
ancient15–150.0113%20 Feb →
dust210–130.0318%17 Feb →
inferno3–13-0.0824%17 Feb →
ancient8–13-0.0319%17 Feb →
mirage13–20.0411%17 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.0221%7 Feb →
mirage13–7-0.0113%7 Feb →
train13–10-0.0113%7 Feb →
overpass13–100.0116%15 Feb →
office9–13-0.0110%15 Feb →
inferno12–120.036%15 Feb →
ancient13–100.1719%15 Feb →
anubis13–10-0.0216%7 Feb →
dust213–70.0717%7 Feb →
inferno12–16-0.0122%20 Sept →
overpass6–130.0823%20 Sept →
vertigo7–13-0.0127%19 Sept →
vertigo7–130.0120%19 Sept →
overpass16–140.039%18 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0113%18 Sept →
inferno16–130.069%18 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0313%18 Sept →
overpass7–13-0.0017%18 Sept →
mirage13–60.1327%18 Sept →
inferno12–4-0.057%18 Sept →
vertigo11–130.0419%18 Sept →
ancient5–130.0319%18 Sept →
ancient13–80.0412%17 Sept →
vertigo13–30.1027%17 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0414%17 Sept →
overpass7–13-0.0710%17 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0219%16 Sept →
inferno13–110.056%16 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0616%16 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.0110%16 Sept →
inferno13–90.0421%16 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0024%16 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0017%16 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0421%16 Sept →
ancient13–10.0612%16 Sept →
inferno13–100.0720%1 Sept →
inferno6–00.0415%1 Sept →
inferno6–130.0632%1 Sept →
overpass13–40.1219%1 Sept →
inferno16–90.0617%21 Aug →
mirage11–16-0.0112%19 Aug →
vertigo16–100.0712%19 Aug →
mirage15–150.147%9 Aug →
inferno16–30.1312%9 Aug →
overpass10–160.0115%8 Aug →
inferno16–50.0216%8 Aug →
inferno11–16-0.0320%8 Aug →
overpass16–2-0.044%8 Aug →
ancient16–100.0616%8 Aug →
mirage3–160.0015%8 Aug →
mirage15–150.0519%7 Aug →
vertigo16–40.158%7 Aug →
overpass16–140.1417%7 Aug →
inferno16–120.1716%7 Aug →
inferno13–160.0615%6 Aug →
vertigo10–16-0.0511%6 Aug →
inferno7–160.0619%6 Aug →
overpass10–16-0.0313%5 Aug →
mirage10–16-0.0213%5 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.