eATPANT — CS2 Stats

76561197960318576[U:1:52848]

3,246Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 Developing
Premier CS Rating20,289Pink band · top ~8.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2891 of 6731 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

20,289Peak Premier on CSDB
1,789Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,789
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 212 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,289
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,711 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGeATPANTPREMIER20,289 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,789csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning34
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52417Last 10052%Win rateLWLLLTWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6
Aggression2.7
Utility5.0
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 34% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning3.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact7.9

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time596ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — ancient 13–3
130Biggest win — anubis
8Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 20mirageWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2015575%-0.00
dust2C2081240%-0.04
infernoA159660%-0.02
mirageD134931%-0.04
anubisD124833%-0.01
cacheS96367%-0.03
nukeA74357%0.02
shelter21150%-0.01
boulder1010%-0.09
fachwerk110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,453Matches
51%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
72.4ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient19756%0.9814.3
Anubis16548%0.9914.5
Inferno14543%0.9613.6
Dust213252%0.8914.2
Mirage12640%0.8513.5
Overpass3123%0.9214.7
Nuke2654%1.0415.2
Train1436%0.7313.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy
30.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.4%Spray accuracy
70.4%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
589msReaction time
18.1%T opening success
34.3%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
8.08HE damage / grenade
8.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4021 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.1061% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis2–13-0.0324%27 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0115%27 Aug
nuke11–130.0018%21 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0523%21 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0726%21 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0221%21 Aug
ancient9–20.0330%21 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0622%20 Aug
dust213–9-0.0916%20 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0340%18 Aug
ancient13–50.0629%18 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0235%18 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0418%18 Aug
ancient4–130.0024%15 Aug
dust21–13-0.0824%14 Aug
cache16–14-0.0519%14 Aug
dust213–8-0.0325%14 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0323%14 Aug
cache8–13-0.0026%13 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0124%13 Aug
dust213–11-0.0319%11 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0712%11 Aug
inferno13–50.0321%9 Aug
inferno9–60.0529%9 Aug
mirage3–13-0.1219%9 Aug
dust213–10-0.0814%9 Aug
anubis13–60.0017%8 Aug
dust213–2-0.0218%8 Aug
anubis13–50.0429%8 Aug
dust26–12-0.0417%8 Aug
cache13–9-0.0223%8 Aug
nuke13–40.0714%8 Aug
mirage13–30.0226%7 Aug
ancient13–30.0826%7 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0221%7 Aug
cache13–70.0126%7 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0613%7 Aug
cache13–5-0.0222%7 Aug
dust26–13-0.0621%6 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0123%6 Aug
dust213–11-0.0126%6 Aug
nuke11–130.0335%5 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0428%4 Aug
cache13–3-0.0514%1 Aug
inferno10–130.0529%1 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0421%30 Jul
anubis13–00.0533%30 Jul
mirage22–25-0.0719%28 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0025%28 Jul
ancient13–40.0217%28 Jul
dust210–13-0.0920%26 Jul
anubis12–160.0417%26 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0431%25 Jul
inferno13–9-0.056%24 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0222%24 Jul
mirage3–13-0.128%24 Jul
shelter12–120.0224%22 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0012%22 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0819%22 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0317%21 Jul
inferno19–150.0025%21 Jul
cache4–13-0.0922%21 Jul
dust25–130.0122%21 Jul
dust211–130.0118%20 Jul
inferno13–8-0.064%20 Jul
mirage10–130.0327%20 Jul
dust27–13-0.0118%18 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0121%18 Jul
dust213–8-0.0313%18 Jul
inferno12–160.0220%18 Jul
ancient6–130.0131%18 Jul
dust213–110.0223%18 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0121%18 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0231%18 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0126%18 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0523%17 Jul
nuke13–20.0724%17 Jul
dust210–13-0.0522%17 Jul
mirage13–90.0227%16 Jul
ancient13–80.0330%16 Jul
nuke13–100.0227%16 Jul
dust211–13-0.0124%16 Jul
shelter13–2-0.0323%15 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0118%14 Jul
boulder12–12-0.0919%11 Jul
ancient13–50.0129%11 Jul
mirage13–20.0116%11 Jul
fachwerk13–90.0031%10 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0221%9 Jul
dust27–13-0.089%9 Jul
cache13–70.0416%9 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0320%9 Jul
dust23–13-0.0431%7 Jul
cache11–13-0.0622%5 Jul
dust23–13-0.0625%4 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0031%4 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0725%3 Jul
anubis12–120.000%17 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0629%8 Feb
ancient13–7-0.0521%8 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →