mTkz

mTkz — CS2 Stats

VI76561197960290368[U:1:24640]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,268Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,481Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,639Top 10% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14309 of 226438 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,268 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 31 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,639 +640 31 May17 Sept · 21 days played
23,57626,178peak 26,17831 May17 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,962 +0 30 Aug17 Sept · 6 observations
1,9621,962peak 1,96230 Aug17 Sept
26,178Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,962Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-05-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,962
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 39 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 539 below peak (26,178)
  • +24 over 30 days · steady
  • -539 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,361 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,691), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerRed band medianGold band medianvs Gold band
Headshot rate54.3%49.2%50.3%above
Shot accuracy16.3%13.3%11.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.231.131.18above
Match win rate51.5%48.5%51.8%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Gold band player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmTkzPREMIER25,639 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,962csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning46
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59374Last 10059%Win rateWWWTWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +6.8pp headshot accuracy · −74ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 401 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility6.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.6
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time584ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy25.8%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 25 Jul
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · anubis, 28 Jul
406msFastest reaction time · 12–12 · inferno, 9 Sept
13–1Biggest win · cache, 9 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A32201263%0.03
infernoS2718967%0.04
anubisC135838%0.01
cacheB115645%0.04
ancientS75271%-0.00
nukeC52340%0.01
mirage43175%0.03
overpass110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

297,680Lifetime kills
1.23K/D · Top 50% of Red band
8,344Matches
51.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Red band
54.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Red band
16.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Red band
32,679MVPs
4,481Hours (in match)
6,298Bombs planted
2,654Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47127,583
AWP25,564
P2507,765
P905,935
Tec-94,555

Lifetime map wins

18,942dust2
15,112inferno
7,078cbble
4,442nuke
3,818train
3,017vertigo
180italy
168office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,394Matches
53%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
79.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5654%1.2015.4
Dust23956%1.1417.2
Mirage3047%1.1216.6
Ancient2825%1.0714.9
Nuke2245%0.8814.4
Vertigo1947%1.2519.3
Overpass1963%1.4420.7
Anubis1968%1.0716.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
586msReaction time
29.6%T opening success
50.1%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
6.15HE damage / grenade
16.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.6025% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–70.0829%11 Sept
dust213–70.0444%11 Sept
inferno9–40.1038%11 Sept
inferno12–12-0.0114%9 Sept
ancient13–4-0.0320%5 Sept
cache11–130.1734%5 Sept
dust213–70.1222%5 Sept
dust29–130.0238%26 Aug
dust27–13-0.0628%25 Aug
inferno11–130.0026%18 Aug
cache10–130.0524%18 Aug
inferno13–11-0.056%18 Aug
dust213–20.1036%18 Aug
dust210–130.0630%11 Aug
nuke9–130.0322%5 Aug
nuke13–80.1119%4 Aug
cache9–13-0.0421%4 Aug
mirage13–100.0427%4 Aug
dust213–110.0221%2 Aug
dust29–13-0.0418%2 Aug
inferno13–50.0524%29 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0120%29 Jul
dust216–120.0234%29 Jul
mirage13–80.0323%29 Jul
inferno13–60.0330%28 Jul
inferno13–90.0821%28 Jul
inferno8–130.0617%28 Jul
inferno13–60.1518%28 Jul
anubis13–40.0118%28 Jul
anubis0–13-0.0450%28 Jul
dust22–13-0.0635%28 Jul
inferno13–50.0823%27 Jul
dust213–50.0623%27 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0016%27 Jul
anubis2–13-0.1121%27 Jul
dust213–80.0218%26 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0427%26 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0235%26 Jul
inferno13–30.1234%26 Jul
inferno12–120.0825%26 Jul
cache13–70.0723%25 Jul
anubis13–50.0626%25 Jul
dust213–70.1818%25 Jul
dust210–130.0424%25 Jul
dust213–6-0.0424%25 Jul
dust213–20.0521%24 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0627%24 Jul
dust27–130.0312%24 Jul
anubis13–60.0724%24 Jul
cache13–90.0110%24 Jul
inferno13–80.0225%24 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0316%23 Jul
dust213–10-0.0013%23 Jul
cache9–13-0.0323%23 Jul
dust213–100.0818%23 Jul
dust29–13-0.0223%23 Jul
inferno9–130.0822%23 Jul
anubis11–130.1321%23 Jul
dust23–130.0025%23 Jul
inferno12–120.0140%23 Jul
ancient9–130.0122%23 Jul
dust213–50.0432%22 Jul
inferno7–130.0150%21 Jul
inferno16–120.0720%21 Jul
dust213–90.0924%21 Jul
inferno13–60.0522%9 Jul
cache13–10.1718%9 Jul
dust213–90.0845%9 Jul
inferno6–10.0227%2 Jul
dust23–13-0.0415%2 Jul
cache2–13-0.0718%18 Jun
dust213–100.1131%18 Jun
dust213–4-0.0324%18 Jun
cache13–80.0420%18 Jun
cache13–100.0930%18 Jun
dust213–60.0733%18 Jun
mirage13–110.0726%18 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0723%18 Jun
inferno13–2-0.0615%18 Jun
ancient13–80.0624%16 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0315%16 Jun
dust213–80.0230%16 Jun
inferno11–130.0632%16 Jun
ancient13–30.0422%16 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0219%15 Jun
anubis20–22-0.056%7 Jun
dust26–13-0.0220%6 Jun
cache3–130.0218%6 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0125%5 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0212%5 Jun
dust27–13-0.0318%5 Jun
anubis13–110.0419%5 Jun
anubis11–130.0023%5 Jun
ancient13–6-0.022%5 Jun
overpass13–60.0530%2 Jun
anubis10–130.0023%2 Jun
anubis13–60.0832%2 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0121%1 Jun
inferno13–90.0820%31 May
dust213–60.0216%31 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →