1200

1200 — CS2 Stats

MF76561198168795573[U:1:208529845]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,338Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,512Top 50% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#61088 of 252248 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,871 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 21,512 → 21,512
0Faceit ELO · 1,871 → 1,871
+3Tracked matches · now 3,338
0.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 56.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,512 -3,309 21 Jun – 14 Oct · 18 days played
19,64825,773peak 25,77321 Jun14 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,871 +0 30 Aug – 14 Oct · 6 observations
1,8711,871peak 1,87130 Aug14 Oct
26,358Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,871Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-06-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,871
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 130 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,261 below peak (25,773)
  • -3,601 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,488 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG1200FACEITLevel 9 · 1,871 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,512 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,871csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning64
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–45–1Last 10054%Win rateWWLWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.9
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.4
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time510ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 510ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 2 Aug →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · nuke, 26 Jul →
383msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · anubis, 13 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 14anubisWeakest map · 35% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC238–1535%0.00
mirageA2212–1055%0.01
dust2B178–947%0.02
ancientS1410–471%0.02
nukeA117–464%0.01
infernoA85–363%0.02
cache—33–0100%0.04
overpass—21–150%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,492Matches
51%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
81.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18147%1.1417.6
Anubis15552%1.1816.5
Ancient15354%1.1316.8
Dust214249%1.1316.4
Inferno10442%0.9914.8
Nuke5542%1.2016.8
Train2352%1.1517.8
Overpass1050%0.9715.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
72.7%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
512msReaction time
39.7%T opening success
56.9%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
8.55HE damage / grenade
8.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.6959% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–9-0.0340%3 Oct →
anubis13–10.098%3 Oct →
anubis8–130.0221%27 Sept →
anubis13–110.0923%27 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0430%23 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0121%23 Sept →
nuke13–80.0317%23 Sept →
nuke13–110.0322%23 Sept →
dust213–90.0229%21 Sept →
anubis11–130.023%13 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0230%12 Sept →
dust213–70.0223%12 Sept →
inferno13–80.0121%11 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0228%10 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0626%10 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0432%7 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0232%7 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0310%6 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0627%4 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0816%30 Aug →
nuke13–160.0721%30 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0123%29 Aug →
cache13–80.0430%29 Aug →
dust210–130.0233%29 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0011%23 Aug →
nuke16–120.0529%19 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0517%17 Aug →
ancient13–110.0325%16 Aug →
anubis13–80.0937%16 Aug →
ancient13–50.0414%16 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0424%9 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0121%9 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0341%9 Aug →
ancient13–80.0716%8 Aug →
cache13–70.0530%3 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0121%3 Aug →
ancient13–60.0117%3 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0119%3 Aug →
inferno13–50.1422%2 Aug →
mirage13–90.0240%2 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0221%2 Aug →
dust29–130.0325%2 Aug →
dust26–130.0424%2 Aug →
inferno13–90.0517%2 Aug →
ancient13–100.0420%1 Aug →
mirage14–160.0720%27 Jul →
anubis2–130.0336%27 Jul →
dust213–80.048%26 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0218%26 Jul →
dust213–70.0415%26 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0136%26 Jul →
nuke13–100.0242%26 Jul →
mirage13–60.0629%26 Jul →
dust29–130.0422%25 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0915%18 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0320%13 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0311%13 Jul →
cache13–90.0217%13 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0520%13 Jul →
anubis17–19-0.0123%11 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0316%11 Jul →
dust213–80.0138%11 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0321%11 Jul →
mirage13–80.0116%9 Jul →
mirage16–12-0.0022%5 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0217%5 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0926%4 Jul →
ancient13–110.0312%4 Jul →
anubis13–110.0123%4 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0728%3 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0030%3 Jul →
nuke15–150.0018%3 Jul →
nuke13–30.1011%3 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0117%3 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0114%3 Jul →
overpass13–80.0420%29 Jun →
mirage10–130.0832%29 Jun →
mirage13–90.0624%29 Jun →
dust213–50.0030%28 Jun →
mirage4–100.0117%28 Jun →
anubis14–16-0.0221%28 Jun →
mirage11–130.0418%28 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0122%28 Jun →
ancient13–20.0820%28 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0127%28 Jun →
anubis13–90.0119%28 Jun →
anubis7–130.0241%28 Jun →
mirage13–5-0.0015%27 Jun →
inferno13–60.099%26 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0419%25 Jun →
ancient13–60.1020%25 Jun →
inferno13–100.0216%25 Jun →
dust216–140.0919%24 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0218%24 Jun →
ancient14–16-0.0122%22 Jun →
mirage13–10.0825%22 Jun →
mirage13–70.0021%22 Jun →
mirage13–60.1117%21 Jun →
dust213–40.0623%21 Jun →
overpass13–160.0121%21 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.