BL4

BL4 — CS2 Stats

FI76561197960286712[U:1:20984]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,389Tracked matches28%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating5,000Light Blue band · top ~78.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,406 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 5,000 -2,497 26 Aug – 9 Oct · 21 days played
5,0009,061peak 9,06126 Aug9 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,406 +0 28 Aug – 22 Sept · 5 observations
1,4061,406peak 1,40628 Aug22 Sept
9,242Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,406Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-08-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,406
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 125 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,061 below peak (9,061)
  • -3,710 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBL4FACEITLevel 5 · 1,406 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER5,000 · Light Blue band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,406csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning55
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD37–60–3Last 10037%Win rateWWLLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · −145ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 695ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility6.7
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.2

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 650ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.5
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time651ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 651ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–0 · nuke, 21 Sept →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · dust2, 24 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · inferno, 17 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 26 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 43% over 21dust2Weakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC229–1341%-0.01
ancientC219–1243%-0.01
nukeC156–940%-0.01
cacheC146–843%0.00
anubisD113–827%-0.03
dust2D91–811%-0.05
mirageD72–529%-0.00
eldorado—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

822Matches
46%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
78.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno13953%1.0916.0
Ancient12953%1.0115.2
Nuke10752%0.9515.2
Anubis10547%0.9115.3
Dust28839%1.0715.0
Overpass3247%1.0215.6
Mirage2928%0.9312.6
Cache1937%0.8914.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
78.8%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
650msReaction time
51.4%T opening success
36.5%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
10.04HE damage / grenade
13.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.4996% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–13-0.0114%11 Oct →
ancient13–60.0214%11 Oct →
inferno6–130.0323%11 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0611%9 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0514%9 Oct →
mirage13–40.1321%9 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0312%9 Oct →
cache6–130.0218%8 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0329%8 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0316%8 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0619%8 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.0118%8 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.029%8 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.063%8 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.1110%5 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0712%5 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0211%5 Oct →
cache8–13-0.059%4 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0621%4 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0417%4 Oct →
nuke0–13-0.0413%4 Oct →
inferno6–130.0923%2 Oct →
cache6–13-0.1010%30 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0327%30 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0412%29 Sept →
ancient12–160.0115%29 Sept →
anubis13–110.0417%29 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0113%29 Sept →
inferno13–80.0814%29 Sept →
mirage7–130.027%24 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0631%24 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0616%24 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0814%24 Sept →
inferno13–70.0314%24 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0517%24 Sept →
ancient5–130.0515%24 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.098%23 Sept →
dust22–13-0.1119%21 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0610%21 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0720%21 Sept →
cache2–130.0730%21 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0914%21 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0716%21 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0710%21 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0518%21 Sept →
cache13–40.048%21 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.068%21 Sept →
ancient10–130.0427%21 Sept →
nuke9–00.1516%21 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0619%17 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.108%17 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0215%17 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0416%17 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.089%17 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0114%17 Sept →
cache7–130.0613%17 Sept →
nuke16–120.0110%17 Sept →
ancient9–130.0317%11 Sept →
inferno13–100.0424%11 Sept →
nuke9–130.0711%11 Sept →
ancient13–60.0115%11 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0325%11 Sept →
cache13–110.087%11 Sept →
inferno15–150.0711%10 Sept →
ancient16–140.0413%10 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0311%10 Sept →
inferno13–90.0318%7 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.038%6 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0415%6 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0114%6 Sept →
dust217–190.0022%6 Sept →
anubis11–130.0212%6 Sept →
inferno16–120.0117%3 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0310%3 Sept →
anubis9–130.0317%3 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0210%3 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.089%3 Sept →
dust215–150.0318%2 Sept →
inferno5–130.017%2 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.014%2 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.068%2 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0316%2 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0014%2 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0515%2 Sept →
eldorado9–50.0618%2 Sept →
inferno13–90.0113%2 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0313%2 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0510%2 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.1113%2 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0217%2 Sept →
nuke8–130.0112%1 Sept →
cache13–80.069%1 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0017%1 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0616%29 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0311%28 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0617%28 Aug →
cache16–120.0715%28 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0316%28 Aug →
nuke13–10.1125%26 Aug →
ancient13–60.1120%26 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.