Herkkupamppu

Herkkupamppu — CS2 Stats

FI76561198076729577[U:1:116463849]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,112Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,365Top 25% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#37939 of 251364 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,557 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,365 -1,204 25 Aug – 10 Oct · 14 days played
23,19424,569peak 24,56925 Aug10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,557 +0 31 Aug – 22 Sept · 5 observations
1,5571,557peak 1,55731 Aug22 Sept
24,671Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,557Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-08-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,557
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 194 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,204 below peak (24,569)
  • -482 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,635 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHerkkupamppuFACEITLevel 9 · 1,557 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,365 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,557csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning67
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateLWWLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.7
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning6.7
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time569ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 22 Sept →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · inferno, 17 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 22 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · dust2, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 59% over 27anubisWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2716–1159%0.02
ancientB2614–1254%-0.00
nukeB168–850%-0.01
anubisC145–936%0.01
dust2B105–550%0.00
mirage—30–30%0.01
cache—21–150%-0.00
train—10–10%-0.02
vertigo—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,213Matches
50%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
79.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno25156%1.3217.1
Ancient25056%1.1815.9
Nuke17853%1.2016.8
Anubis16051%1.1816.5
Dust213141%1.1415.4
Overpass5845%1.0615.2
Mirage2623%0.9013.0
Vertigo2330%1.1917.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
569msReaction time
52.6%T opening success
50.5%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
10.86HE damage / grenade
7.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–13-0.0513%12 Oct →
inferno16–130.0513%11 Oct →
ancient13–60.0210%11 Oct →
inferno6–130.0321%11 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0310%11 Oct →
ancient13–40.0415%10 Oct →
dust216–140.0222%10 Oct →
anubis12–160.0419%10 Oct →
inferno13–70.1530%9 Oct →
ancient13–40.016%9 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.0111%8 Oct →
inferno13–50.0316%4 Oct →
nuke8–130.0522%4 Oct →
anubis10–130.0812%29 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0613%29 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0423%28 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.049%27 Sept →
dust213–70.0331%27 Sept →
anubis13–40.0513%25 Sept →
ancient13–90.0514%25 Sept →
mirage7–130.0614%24 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0011%24 Sept →
anubis13–90.0818%24 Sept →
dust26–130.0219%24 Sept →
inferno13–70.0120%24 Sept →
inferno13–40.018%23 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.047%23 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0411%23 Sept →
inferno13–40.1721%22 Sept →
anubis13–40.0414%22 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0813%22 Sept →
inferno4–130.0210%21 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0322%21 Sept →
ancient9–130.0312%21 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0023%21 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0015%18 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0314%18 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0215%18 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0311%18 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0714%18 Sept →
inferno13–110.0117%18 Sept →
cache13–90.0620%18 Sept →
nuke13–70.0216%17 Sept →
anubis10–130.0420%17 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0432%17 Sept →
ancient13–50.0611%17 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0716%17 Sept →
nuke16–120.0122%17 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.059%15 Sept →
nuke13–90.006%15 Sept →
inferno25–23-0.0318%14 Sept →
anubis13–50.0113%14 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.057%14 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0520%11 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.068%11 Sept →
ancient16–140.0014%10 Sept →
inferno11–130.0521%10 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0412%9 Sept →
dust210–130.0111%9 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0715%9 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0418%9 Sept →
nuke16–12-0.0611%8 Sept →
dust213–100.0015%8 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.049%8 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0316%8 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.058%8 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0311%7 Sept →
ancient5–130.0010%7 Sept →
inferno13–60.058%7 Sept →
inferno13–40.0813%6 Sept →
nuke13–50.0219%6 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0110%6 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0310%3 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0910%30 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.0216%30 Aug →
inferno8–130.0328%28 Aug →
inferno9–130.0413%28 Aug →
nuke13–70.0214%25 Aug →
anubis13–30.0819%25 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0411%25 Aug →
ancient13–80.0420%25 Aug →
inferno13–160.0117%25 Aug →
ancient13–110.0614%23 Aug →
dust210–130.0316%23 Aug →
ancient9–130.0218%23 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.027%23 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.1019%23 Aug →
train12–12-0.027%22 Aug →
ancient13–40.0516%22 Aug →
vertigo2–13-0.0221%21 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0218%21 Aug →
mirage6–130.027%21 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0911%21 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0423%21 Aug →
inferno13–40.0319%17 Aug →
ancient6–130.018%15 Aug →
inferno13–70.0017%10 Aug →
ancient16–120.1113%10 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0124%10 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0112%9 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.