[SLIP] Kaps πŸ–€

[SLIP] Kaps πŸ–€ β€” CS2 Stats

FR76561197960285831[U:1:20103]Steam profile β†—βœ“ No bans

405Tracked matches36%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,721Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating7,362Light Blue band Β· top ~67.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#42711 of 57104 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

7,362Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak β€” 7,362
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 β€” 2,638 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations β€” this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,669), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here β€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate51.0%42.7%43.7%above
Shot accuracy21.5%10.8%11.8%above
Kill/death ratio0.991.001.020.04 short
Match win rate38.3%44.1%45.0%6.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms β€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG[SLIP] Kaps πŸ–€FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER7,362 Β· Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere β€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning37
Utility10

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY30–67–3Last 10030%Win rateWWLWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate Β· +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler β€” Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3
Aggression4.3
Utility1.0
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.5

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates β€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions β€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison β†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points β€” deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game β€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 23% on T β€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start β€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers β€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning3.7
Utility1.0
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact0.2

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (Γ—0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04βˆ’0.02
first β…“ avg -0.02 β†’ last β…“ avg -0.04
Reaction time622msβˆ’71ms
first β…“ avg 693ms β†’ last β…“ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+0.9%
first β…“ avg 19.6% β†’ last β…“ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating β€” ancient 13–9
13–0Biggest win β€” anubis
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≀2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map Β· 67% over 6dust2Weakest map Β· 20% over 40
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D408–3220%-0.03
ancientD164–1225%-0.03
cacheC146–843%-0.01
infernoD134–931%-0.06
nukeD82–625%-0.00
anubisS64–267%-0.01
italyβ€”11–0100%-0.03
trainβ€”10–10%-0.04
mirageβ€”11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 40). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

129,722Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
7,131Matches
38.3%Match win rate
51.0%Headshot % Β· Top 25% of Level 4 players
21.5%Shot accuracy Β· Top 1% of Level 4 players
9,810MVPs
2,291Hours (in match)
3,467Bombs planted
743Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4758,826
AWP10,838
FAMAS3,611
MP71,180
P2501,134
Knife839

Lifetime map wins

10,468dust2
3,578inferno
2,171nuke
1,367italy
1,147cbble
1,064train
570office
569dust

Lifetime totals via Steam β€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches β€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
85.5%Counter-strafing
9.4Β°Preaim
623msReaction time
23.5%T opening success
40.6%CT opening success
0.02Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
9.22HE damage / grenade
0.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag β€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.0198 β€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups β†’
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.4807% β€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics β€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 40 tracked games β€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy β†’Dust 2 grenade lineups β†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–6-0.0315%22 Aug β†’
anubis13–11-0.0326%22 Aug β†’
dust29–13-0.0231%22 Aug β†’
italy13–3-0.0327%21 Aug β†’
cache5–13-0.0228%21 Aug β†’
ancient9–13-0.1125%21 Aug β†’
dust27–13-0.0527%21 Aug β†’
dust25–13-0.0622%20 Aug β†’
cache13–11-0.0233%20 Aug β†’
train0–13-0.0428%17 Aug β†’
ancient4–13-0.0613%17 Aug β†’
dust24–13-0.0629%17 Aug β†’
anubis2–13-0.0813%16 Aug β†’
anubis13–9-0.0223%15 Aug β†’
dust27–13-0.0326%15 Aug β†’
dust25–13-0.0416%15 Aug β†’
inferno6–13-0.0215%15 Aug β†’
cache12–12-0.0210%15 Aug β†’
dust213–8-0.0626%15 Aug β†’
dust29–13-0.0123%15 Aug β†’
ancient8–13-0.119%14 Aug β†’
dust25–13-0.0612%14 Aug β†’
dust215–15-0.0328%14 Aug β†’
ancient9–13-0.0219%14 Aug β†’
dust25–130.0013%14 Aug β†’
cache13–10-0.0618%13 Aug β†’
inferno10–13-0.0816%13 Aug β†’
dust25–2-0.0219%13 Aug β†’
dust213–9-0.0121%12 Aug β†’
cache16–14-0.0117%12 Aug β†’
ancient5–13-0.0713%11 Aug β†’
ancient5–13-0.028%11 Aug β†’
cache13–50.0629%11 Aug β†’
ancient3–13-0.0715%11 Aug β†’
dust213–8-0.0322%10 Aug β†’
inferno10–13-0.0617%10 Aug β†’
mirage13–7-0.0222%9 Aug β†’
dust26–13-0.0117%9 Aug β†’
inferno5–13-0.1122%9 Aug β†’
inferno13–50.0229%8 Aug β†’
cache7–13-0.0724%8 Aug β†’
inferno13–8-0.0612%8 Aug β†’
dust210–13-0.0215%8 Aug β†’
ancient13–6-0.0114%8 Aug β†’
inferno5–13-0.0317%8 Aug β†’
nuke3–13-0.0917%8 Aug β†’
inferno11–13-0.0933%7 Aug β†’
dust28–130.0127%7 Aug β†’
inferno7–13-0.0716%6 Aug β†’
ancient13–2-0.0416%6 Aug β†’
dust212–12-0.0118%6 Aug β†’
cache6–13-0.0516%6 Aug β†’
inferno6–13-0.0710%5 Aug β†’
ancient11–130.0130%5 Aug β†’
ancient7–130.0115%5 Aug β†’
dust213–80.0219%4 Aug β†’
ancient3–13-0.1115%4 Aug β†’
anubis8–130.0220%3 Aug β†’
cache7–130.0320%3 Aug β†’
dust24–13-0.037%3 Aug β†’
dust26–13-0.0219%2 Aug β†’
cache16–130.0321%1 Aug β†’
nuke13–6-0.0222%1 Aug β†’
inferno13–8-0.0216%1 Aug β†’
cache13–11-0.0022%1 Aug β†’
dust23–130.0422%1 Aug β†’
dust213–70.0224%1 Aug β†’
nuke6–13-0.0411%1 Aug β†’
ancient10–130.026%31 Jul β†’
cache7–13-0.0428%31 Jul β†’
ancient16–120.0120%31 Jul β†’
anubis16–14-0.0226%31 Jul β†’
anubis13–00.0618%31 Jul β†’
inferno11–13-0.0716%30 Jul β†’
dust216–130.0428%30 Jul β†’
ancient13–90.0918%28 Jul β†’
cache12–160.0116%28 Jul β†’
dust210–130.0119%28 Jul β†’
dust28–13-0.0219%27 Jul β†’
ancient9–130.0122%27 Jul β†’
dust25–13-0.0914%27 Jul β†’
nuke13–90.0826%26 Jul β†’
dust25–13-0.0318%26 Jul β†’
dust23–13-0.0512%25 Jul β†’
dust27–13-0.0921%25 Jul β†’
inferno13–11-0.0813%25 Jul β†’
dust28–13-0.0519%24 Jul β†’
nuke9–130.0131%24 Jul β†’
dust28–130.0028%24 Jul β†’
nuke6–13-0.0122%24 Jul β†’
cache8–13-0.0132%23 Jul β†’
dust211–13-0.0318%23 Jul β†’
nuke11–130.0111%23 Jul β†’
dust211–13-0.0719%22 Jul β†’
dust211–130.0128%22 Jul β†’
nuke4–130.0416%21 Jul β†’
dust25–13-0.0616%21 Jul β†’
dust26–13-0.0824%19 Jul β†’
dust22–13-0.0913%18 Jul β†’
dust28–130.0020%18 Jul β†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone β†’Inventory value for this account β†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers β†’