zero — CS2 Stats

76561199889501430[U:1:1929235702]

287Tracked matches40%Win rate2025Tracked since
335Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating17,051Purple band · top ~20.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,750 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 27 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,051 +3,493 27 Jan15 Sept · 19 days played
13,55819,491peak 19,49127 Jan15 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,750Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-01-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,750
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 1 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,440 below peak (19,491)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,949 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches21+1
Win rate0%0%0pp
K/D1.161.00+0.16
Headshot %46%50%−4pp

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate58.9%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy0.0%13.0%13.2%13.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.801.061.070.27 short
Match win rate48.9%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzeroFACEITLevel 8 · 1,750 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER17,051 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,750csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning40
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5347Last 10053%Win rateLLLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · +19ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Last 10

  • 19 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.4
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch5.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.6° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.0
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time581ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy28.5%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 25.8% → last ⅓ avg 28.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 29 Jan
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–4 · nuke, 1 Sept
328msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · nuke, 1 Sept
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 26 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L6Current streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 73% over 11anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA1810856%-0.02
mirageB189950%0.01
infernoB179853%0.02
anubisD113827%-0.02
ancientA117464%0.02
nukeC114736%-0.01
dust2S118373%0.04
overpass220100%0.02
office110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

8,051Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
348Matches
48.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
58.9%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
897MVPs
192Hours (in match)
166Bombs planted
61Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

703dust2
460inferno
399nuke
106train
61vertigo
26office
25italy
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

117Matches
58%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
90.8ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22861%1.3818.6
Mirage2454%1.0316.8
Nuke1861%1.3119.1
Ancient1650%1.2418.0
Inferno1681%1.3318.1
Train956%1.0815.6
Overpass425%1.1920.0
Anubis20%0.569.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.0%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
79.9%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
584msReaction time
27.6%T opening success
56.3%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
10.41HE damage / grenade
7.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.6387% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–13-0.0117%15 Sept
mirage5–130.0127%12 Sept
mirage4–130.0222%3 Sept
anubis2–13-0.100%2 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0424%2 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0119%1 Sept
cache13–7-0.0320%1 Sept
nuke0–4-0.01100%1 Sept
mirage9–130.0430%1 Sept
ancient6–130.0226%1 Sept
inferno13–40.0841%1 Sept
mirage13–160.0529%1 Sept
cache13–40.0620%31 Aug
anubis13–50.0626%31 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0514%31 Aug
inferno4–130.0352%31 Aug
inferno13–70.1024%30 Aug
cache11–13-0.0435%30 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0536%30 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0126%30 Aug
dust22–13-0.0367%30 Aug
inferno13–70.0428%30 Aug
mirage13–30.0232%30 Aug
dust213–11-0.0125%30 Aug
ancient13–50.0628%30 Aug
nuke1–6-0.0625%30 Aug
mirage13–40.0927%30 Aug
anubis0–13-0.050%29 Aug
nuke9–130.0720%29 Aug
mirage13–40.0828%29 Aug
dust29–130.0326%29 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0727%28 Aug
dust213–10-0.0121%28 Aug
cache14–160.0323%28 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0426%28 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0129%28 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0329%28 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0331%27 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0129%27 Aug
inferno6–130.0433%27 Aug
ancient13–50.0925%27 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0435%26 Aug
cache11–130.0133%26 Aug
inferno13–50.0538%26 Aug
nuke13–50.0033%26 Aug
inferno13–00.1223%26 Aug
mirage13–60.0637%26 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0737%26 Aug
mirage13–90.0225%25 Aug
inferno1–13-0.1013%25 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0629%25 Aug
inferno13–80.0610%25 Aug
nuke13–30.0130%25 Aug
anubis13–40.0520%25 Aug
cache13–6-0.0827%25 Aug
cache2–13-0.0430%24 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0725%19 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0419%19 Aug
mirage13–20.0528%17 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0511%16 Aug
cache3–13-0.0520%14 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0127%13 Aug
cache10–13-0.0513%12 Aug
mirage8–13-0.1016%9 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0430%9 Aug
cache11–1-0.0520%9 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0719%29 Jul
dust213–50.0236%29 Jul
cache16–13-0.0328%22 Jul
cache13–70.0445%22 Jul
dust29–130.0135%18 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0220%17 Jul
office13–6-0.0118%17 May
cache0–13-0.0927%17 May
cache13–4-0.0329%9 May
cache13–11-0.0129%9 May
cache13–110.0121%7 May
cache13–50.0030%29 Apr
overpass13–6-0.0133%12 Mar
anubis3–13-0.076%2 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0333%1 Feb
ancient13–70.0629%30 Jan
dust216–140.0721%30 Jan
mirage13–60.0415%30 Jan
overpass13–60.0415%29 Jan
mirage13–9-0.0728%29 Jan
ancient13–110.1123%29 Jan
dust213–10.1326%29 Jan
inferno13–80.0120%28 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0219%28 Jan
ancient13–80.0624%28 Jan
anubis13–70.0025%28 Jan
inferno13–100.0521%28 Jan
dust213–50.1037%28 Jan
ancient3–13-0.0628%28 Jan
dust213–60.0622%27 Jan
nuke11–13-0.0124%27 Jan
nuke13–100.0025%27 Jan
inferno13–110.0322%27 Jan
dust213–20.0238%27 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →