aynotay

aynotay — CS2 Stats

76561199870696012[U:1:1910430284]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

145Tracked matches37%Win rate2026Tracked since
661Hours in CS37Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating5,000Light Blue band · top ~78.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 60 days played since 17 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 5,000 -1,992 29 Mar18 Sept · 17 days played
4,88610,104peak 10,10429 Mar18 Sept
10,104Peak Premier in tracked matches
60Days played since 2026-02-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,104 below peak (10,104)
  • -4,615 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,018), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate44.5%41.9%42.7%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.2%11.2%11.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.980.981.00meets
Match win rate29.7%43.3%43.9%14.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaynotayFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER5,000 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning63
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43534Last 10043%Win rateLWLLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility3.5
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning6.3
Utility3.5
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time613ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 675ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 13.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 12 Sept
60%Best headshot accuracy · 3–2 · inferno, 18 Apr
508msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 18 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 4 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 100% over 5dust2Weakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC33132039%-0.00
anubisB20101050%-0.01
infernoD103730%-0.01
dust2D92722%-0.01
ancientS75271%0.04
overpassS550100%0.01
cacheC52340%0.02
vertigo41325%-0.06
nuke31233%-0.04
italy1010%-0.10
poseidon1010%0.04
train1010%-0.10
office110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

30,940Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
1,735Matches
29.7%Match win rate
44.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,109MVPs
434Hours (in match)
347Bombs planted
170Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,636dust2
848inferno
709nuke
696vertigo
374office
202italy
142train
78ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
614msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
43.2%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
2.4%Flash assists
9.05HE damage / grenade
6.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4609 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.2159% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–13-0.0318%18 Sept
anubis13–20.034%18 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0711%18 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0225%18 Sept
ancient9–130.027%17 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0218%16 Sept
mirage11–130.0313%16 Sept
inferno16–130.0418%15 Sept
anubis11–130.0016%13 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0414%13 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0313%12 Sept
mirage13–70.0822%12 Sept
ancient13–10.1310%12 Sept
dust28–13-0.0623%11 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0113%11 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0016%11 Sept
mirage13–100.0112%11 Sept
mirage13–40.0630%10 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0118%10 Sept
inferno10–130.0118%10 Sept
ancient13–80.1126%10 Sept
dust213–80.1318%9 Sept
mirage6–130.0430%9 Sept
vertigo9–13-0.0213%9 Sept
vertigo0–2-0.030%9 Sept
anubis7–130.0320%8 Sept
anubis1–13-0.0218%6 Sept
mirage9–130.0021%6 Sept
inferno13–90.0325%5 Sept
anubis11–1-0.0213%4 Sept
mirage13–0-0.0129%4 Sept
anubis4–7-0.1825%3 Sept
anubis13–110.0418%1 Sept
mirage8–13-0.039%31 Aug
anubis13–80.0718%31 Aug
anubis13–80.0220%31 Aug
mirage13–40.0624%31 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0211%30 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0113%30 Aug
anubis13–60.0115%29 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0018%29 Aug
anubis13–10.0827%29 Aug
anubis13–70.0321%29 Aug
mirage6–130.0414%25 Aug
mirage8–130.0327%25 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0619%25 Jul
anubis17–19-0.0513%25 Jun
overpass13–100.0815%24 Jun
overpass13–6-0.0516%24 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0118%22 Jun
italy8–13-0.1013%19 Jun
mirage8–13-0.098%12 Jun
inferno13–110.0520%9 Jun
vertigo13–10-0.138%3 Jun
anubis2–130.0226%30 May
poseidon8–80.0427%16 May
cache9–130.0436%15 May
mirage16–140.0220%10 May
cache7–13-0.0011%7 May
cache12–12-0.0321%6 May
cache13–110.0120%29 Apr
cache13–30.0816%29 Apr
train3–13-0.100%22 Apr
mirage13–90.0610%22 Apr
dust22–13-0.0618%21 Apr
inferno3–2-0.1160%18 Apr
overpass13–30.1118%17 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0317%16 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0014%14 Apr
mirage13–9-0.028%14 Apr
dust213–80.0120%11 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0113%5 Apr
mirage4–130.0014%4 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0212%3 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0811%3 Apr
dust211–130.0410%1 Apr
mirage7–130.017%31 Mar
overpass13–40.028%31 Mar
ancient13–70.0812%29 Mar
nuke13–6-0.038%25 Mar
anubis13–2-0.060%16 Mar
anubis1–13-0.0619%14 Mar
ancient13–50.0225%14 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0410%14 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0416%12 Mar
dust29–13-0.0725%7 Mar
mirage3–13-0.150%4 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0530%1 Mar
dust25–13-0.0616%1 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0912%28 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0113%28 Feb
mirage13–9-0.019%22 Feb
mirage13–10.0126%22 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0415%21 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0413%21 Feb
mirage15–15-0.0510%21 Feb
dust25–100.0218%20 Feb
office13–50.0013%18 Feb
dust27–13-0.0010%18 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0610%17 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →