Mr.Kendrick

Mr.Kendrick — CS2 Stats

US76561199752457701[U:1:1792191973]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

925Tracked matches54%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,343Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating7,129Light Blue band · top ~68.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 15 days played since 28 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,129 -823 28 Aug18 Sept · 8 days played
6,7277,952peak 7,95228 Aug18 Sept
8,389Peak Premier in tracked matches
15Days played since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 823 below peak (7,952)
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 2,871 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,413), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate44.1%42.7%43.8%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%11.2%12.0%12.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.931.001.020.09 short
Match win rate44.5%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMr.KendrickFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER7,129 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning66
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44479Last 10044%Win rateWTWLWTWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · +6ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 622 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 974 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility4.4
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 68% on T to 44% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.6
Utility4.4
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels6.5
Win Impact6.3

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time598ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 7–2 · train, 30 Aug
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · mirage, 1 Sept
438msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · nuke, 29 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 15 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
39In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 50% over 18mirageWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2391439%-0.00
nukeB189950%-0.01
cacheB147750%0.03
mirageD124833%-0.01
ancientC94544%-0.01
infernoD93633%0.00
anubisB84450%0.04
vertigo42250%0.02
train21150%0.03
overpass110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,020Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
1,547Matches
44.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
44.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,323MVPs
544Hours (in match)
1,049Bombs planted
355Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,821dust2
2,001nuke
1,717inferno
424train
412vertigo
115office
31italy
3ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

18Matches
61%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
78.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage850%0.7912.6
Cache367%1.1616.0
Nuke250%0.9012.5
Dust2250%0.7914.0
Inferno2100%1.0817.5
Ancient1100%1.2012.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
578msReaction time
68.1%T opening success
43.9%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
11.2%Flash assists
0.76HE damage / grenade
11.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–9-0.0117%18 Sept
inferno15–150.0516%18 Sept
anubis13–50.0919%18 Sept
dust26–13-0.0926%17 Sept
dust213–8-0.0424%17 Sept
ancient12–12-0.0214%17 Sept
nuke13–90.1119%17 Sept
nuke1–13-0.0531%16 Sept
anubis13–30.1217%16 Sept
nuke13–100.0222%16 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0116%16 Sept
ancient12–120.0118%16 Sept
overpass13–70.0611%16 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0522%16 Sept
mirage13–90.0619%16 Sept
cache7–130.1521%16 Sept
dust26–130.0423%16 Sept
anubis12–120.0414%16 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0428%16 Sept
dust213–30.0525%15 Sept
ancient13–0-0.0218%15 Sept
ancient13–70.116%15 Sept
dust211–130.0125%13 Sept
inferno13–100.0114%13 Sept
dust210–13-0.0220%13 Sept
dust25–13-0.0313%13 Sept
cache9–130.0315%11 Sept
vertigo13–10-0.0127%11 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0223%11 Sept
dust211–13-0.0211%11 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0613%5 Sept
dust210–13-0.0122%4 Sept
inferno3–13-0.090%4 Sept
vertigo8–130.0310%4 Sept
nuke13–60.0914%4 Sept
dust23–13-0.0119%3 Sept
nuke10–13-0.1111%3 Sept
anubis3–11-0.0326%3 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0119%3 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0614%3 Sept
nuke1–9-0.039%3 Sept
nuke8–13-0.058%3 Sept
cache13–30.0622%3 Sept
anubis12–12-0.0016%3 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0123%3 Sept
train6–13-0.1233%3 Sept
cache13–50.0218%3 Sept
ancient11–13-0.059%2 Sept
nuke13–60.0017%2 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0619%2 Sept
mirage13–70.0217%2 Sept
dust211–13-0.0812%2 Sept
anubis13–80.0626%2 Sept
dust28–13-0.0315%2 Sept
dust213–30.0627%2 Sept
cache9–20.0626%1 Sept
cache12–12-0.048%1 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0427%1 Sept
mirage13–40.0746%1 Sept
inferno13–70.0213%1 Sept
dust214–160.0123%1 Sept
cache6–10.098%1 Sept
mirage4–13-0.118%1 Sept
vertigo13–30.0611%1 Sept
dust28–13-0.0115%1 Sept
dust213–7-0.026%1 Sept
dust213–70.0122%31 Aug
inferno14–160.0019%31 Aug
cache10–13-0.0220%31 Aug
dust213–11-0.0224%31 Aug
cache9–130.0623%30 Aug
train7–20.1715%30 Aug
anubis11–130.0816%30 Aug
inferno6–20.1444%30 Aug
inferno1–13-0.075%30 Aug
anubis2–0-0.040%30 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0212%30 Aug
mirage3–13-0.1011%30 Aug
cache13–6-0.0019%30 Aug
cache5–130.0329%30 Aug
vertigo12–120.0116%29 Aug
cache13–70.0115%29 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0615%29 Aug
mirage3–13-0.110%29 Aug
dust27–130.0217%29 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0113%29 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0326%29 Aug
cache13–60.0137%29 Aug
nuke7–130.0017%29 Aug
mirage12–120.0515%29 Aug
dust213–8-0.0024%29 Aug
dust213–110.0513%29 Aug
nuke13–90.0510%29 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0125%29 Aug
mirage13–30.0221%28 Aug
cache9–13-0.0322%28 Aug
dust210–13-0.0115%28 Aug
dust213–60.1126%28 Aug
mirage4–130.0318%28 Aug
nuke13–90.0114%28 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →