𝓟𝓣𝓢𝓓 — CS2 Stats

GS76561199699561497[U:1:1739295769]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

968Tracked matches57%Win rate2024Tracked since

1,168Hours in CS40Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating20,112Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#70934 of 221388 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+711Premier CS Rating · 19,401 → 20,112

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 22 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,112 +4,590 22 Aug – 17 Sept · 23 days played

20,112Peak Premier in tracked matches

23Days played since 2026-08-22

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 20,112
+4,590 over 30 days · improving
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,888 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

Metric	Last 7	Previous 7	Change
Matches	22	—	—
Win rate	64%	—	—
K/D	0.84	—	—
Headshot %	60%	—	—

Measured 10 Sep 2026 → 17 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	58.2%	42.7%	43.8%	above
Shot accuracy	0.0%	11.2%	12.0%	12.0% short
Kill/death ratio	0.91	0.99	1.02	0.11 short
Match win rate	52.3%	43.9%	44.7%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92

Positioning59

Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateWWWWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.4pp headshot accuracy · +76ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

4–1 · 80% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 26%
Avg reaction 650ms

Last 10

6–4 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 29%
Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

13–7 · 65% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 28%
Avg reaction 546ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim9.2

Utility2.9

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch3.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2

Positioning5.9

Utility2.9

Mechanics7.6

Opening Duels4.7

Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time547ms−27ms

first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms

Headshot accuracy26.2%−0.4%

first ⅓ avg 26.6% → last ⅓ avg 26.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 1–13 · nuke, 30 Aug →

100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 30 Aug →

328msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · mirage, 30 Aug →

13–1Biggest win · inferno, 5 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

W4Current streak

4–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 14nukeWeakest map · 50% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	43	23–20	53%	-0.03
inferno	A	23	14–9	61%	-0.02
anubis	A	14	9–5	64%	-0.02
nuke	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.02
dust2	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.02
ancient	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.01
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

18,742Lifetime kills

0.91K/D

1,263Matches

52.3%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 4 players

58.2%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 4 players

0.0%Shot accuracy

2,442MVPs

541Hours (in match)

893Bombs planted

238Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-475,938

M4A4 / M4A1-S2,694

SSG 082,486

AWP2,410

Desert Eagle2,311

P2000 / USP-S841

XM1014393

FAMAS324

P250263

Galil AR256

Lifetime map wins

3,598inferno

1,368dust2

487nuke

89vertigo

24train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

92Matches

48%Win rate

0.98Avg K/D

76.4ADR

53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

10%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	22	41%	1.03	16.4
Mirage	17	41%	0.85	14.8
Inferno	14	36%	0.89	13.3
Ancient	14	64%	0.91	15.2
Vertigo	13	54%	0.99	15.5
Dust2	8	62%	1.13	13.9
Nuke	3	33%	1.21	16.3
Overpass	1	100%	1.88	32.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.4%Headshot accuracy

35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.1%Spray accuracy

84.3%Counter-strafing

6.3°Preaim

549msReaction time

50.8%T opening success

47.2%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

1.4%Flash assists

4.39HE damage / grenade

5.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4494 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–4	0.02	37%	17 Sept →
mirage	13–7	-0.07	24%	17 Sept →
cache	13–7	-0.05	15%	17 Sept →
nuke	13–3	0.03	31%	17 Sept →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	23%	17 Sept →
inferno	7–13	-0.00	60%	17 Sept →
mirage	0–13	-0.04	0%	17 Sept →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	40%	17 Sept →
inferno	13–4	-0.01	39%	16 Sept →
anubis	13–10	0.02	24%	16 Sept →
mirage	9–13	0.05	41%	16 Sept →
mirage	16–13	-0.02	24%	15 Sept →
mirage	13–11	0.00	29%	15 Sept →
inferno	13–2	-0.04	38%	15 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	28%	15 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	21%	14 Sept →
nuke	13–11	-0.05	23%	11 Sept →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	11%	11 Sept →
nuke	13–5	-0.06	18%	11 Sept →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	25%	11 Sept →
anubis	13–16	-0.00	20%	11 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.12	9%	10 Sept →
dust2	13–7	-0.06	27%	10 Sept →
mirage	13–10	-0.06	23%	10 Sept →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	41%	9 Sept →
mirage	0–13	-0.10	0%	9 Sept →
nuke	0–13	-0.02	33%	9 Sept →
anubis	8–13	-0.08	33%	9 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.00	26%	9 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.06	30%	9 Sept →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	20%	9 Sept →
inferno	13–4	0.03	20%	8 Sept →
mirage	16–12	-0.01	31%	8 Sept →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	33%	8 Sept →
mirage	13–8	-0.06	47%	7 Sept →
inferno	13–4	-0.00	28%	7 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	18%	7 Sept →
mirage	13–9	-0.07	10%	7 Sept →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	43%	7 Sept →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	26%	7 Sept →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	34%	6 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	30%	6 Sept →
anubis	7–13	0.01	21%	6 Sept →
anubis	13–7	-0.05	25%	5 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	25%	5 Sept →
mirage	13–4	0.00	22%	5 Sept →
anubis	13–4	-0.02	14%	5 Sept →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	35%	5 Sept →
inferno	13–1	0.05	33%	5 Sept →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	40%	5 Sept →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	64%	5 Sept →
mirage	3–13	-0.09	18%	5 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.02	26%	5 Sept →
inferno	13–5	-0.01	30%	3 Sept →
anubis	13–9	0.01	18%	3 Sept →
mirage	13–4	0.03	18%	3 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	46%	3 Sept →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	31%	2 Sept →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	36%	2 Sept →
mirage	16–14	-0.07	12%	1 Sept →
anubis	13–9	0.02	42%	1 Sept →
anubis	13–8	0.02	27%	1 Sept →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	23%	1 Sept →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	22%	1 Sept →
inferno	13–8	-0.04	23%	31 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.05	24%	31 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.04	30%	31 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.04	66%	31 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	43%	30 Aug →
mirage	0–13	0.00	100%	30 Aug →
nuke	1–13	0.07	30%	30 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.12	13%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.00	12%	29 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	32%	29 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	25%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	33%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	21%	28 Aug →
nuke	16–12	-0.03	11%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.09	14%	27 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	18%	27 Aug →
nuke	12–16	-0.05	15%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	18%	27 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	9%	27 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	11%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	13%	27 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.09	20%	27 Aug →
cache	3–12	-0.04	25%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.05	37%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.00	17%	25 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	16%	24 Aug →
ancient	3–13	0.00	15%	24 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	20%	24 Aug →
inferno	12–12	0.05	30%	24 Aug →
inferno	1–13	0.01	55%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.06	27%	23 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	30%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–1	-0.04	37%	23 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	27%	23 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	18%	23 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.01	22%	22 Aug →