Shim Slady (TeNsu)

Shim Slady (TeNsu) — CS2 Stats

76561199696634860[U:1:1736369132]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,159Tracked matches63%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,096Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating16,211Purple band · top ~23.6% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−112Premier CS Rating · 16,323 → 16,211
0Faceit ELO · 1,430 → 1,430
+1Tracked matches · now 1,159
0.0ppWin rate · 63.3% → 63.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 9 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,211 +3,652 20 Jul – 26 Sept · 26 days played
12,45516,323peak 16,32320 Jul26 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,430 +0 15 Sept – 25 Sept · 2 observations
1,4301,430peak 1,43015 Sept25 Sept
16,323Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,430Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-07-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,430
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 101 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 112 below peak (16,323)
  • +2,000 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,789 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-25
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate47.0%44.3%46.9%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%11.8%13.0%13.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.121.031.08above
Match win rate49.0%45.2%46.7%above

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGShim Slady (TeNsu)PREMIER16,211 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,430csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning68
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLWWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · +36ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.8
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels6.8
Clutch1.0

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 71% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 71% on T to 49% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.8
Utility6.8
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels7.4
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time550ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 21 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · cache, 15 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 10 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 22 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5cacheWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2310–1343%0.01
cacheD186–1233%0.02
ancientA1610–663%0.00
mirageA159–660%0.02
nukeS128–467%0.02
dust2B105–550%-0.00
anubisS54–180%0.02
shelter—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

20,946Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Purple band
1,283Matches
49.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Purple band
47.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Purple band
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,906MVPs
608Hours (in match)
1,180Bombs planted
519Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,270inferno
1,472nuke
1,407dust2
197vertigo
194train
39office
30italy
22aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

7Matches
71%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
73.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3100%1.2414.7
Mirage250%1.0422.0
Overpass1100%1.0014.0
Inferno10%0.7814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
85.6%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
552msReaction time
70.7%T opening success
48.9%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
7.12HE damage / grenade
20.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–13-0.0116%26 Sept →
cache13–70.0321%24 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0116%23 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0034%23 Sept →
inferno13–70.0524%20 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0212%20 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0221%20 Sept →
inferno9–130.0124%2 Sept →
cache13–90.0822%1 Sept →
nuke11–130.0925%31 Aug →
nuke16–140.0620%31 Aug →
cache13–50.0322%31 Aug →
nuke11–130.0527%31 Aug →
mirage13–80.0927%28 Aug →
nuke13–100.0116%24 Aug →
nuke13–70.010%24 Aug →
cache14–160.0418%22 Aug →
nuke3–130.0026%22 Aug →
cache13–30.0833%22 Aug →
inferno8–130.0726%22 Aug →
mirage13–160.1026%22 Aug →
cache9–130.0324%22 Aug →
ancient16–120.0015%22 Aug →
cache13–00.0714%22 Aug →
ancient13–30.1114%21 Aug →
inferno13–90.0221%21 Aug →
dust213–40.0117%21 Aug →
mirage13–50.1224%21 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0324%21 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0221%21 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0738%21 Aug →
dust213–70.0317%21 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0116%18 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0822%18 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0135%18 Aug →
ancient13–90.0034%18 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0732%18 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.047%17 Aug →
anubis13–1-0.0113%17 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0127%15 Aug →
dust216–120.0520%15 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0323%15 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0150%15 Aug →
inferno15–150.0518%14 Aug →
mirage8–130.038%14 Aug →
nuke13–60.0332%14 Aug →
nuke13–70.0322%14 Aug →
mirage13–00.0721%13 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0528%13 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0118%13 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0217%13 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0017%13 Aug →
anubis8–130.0019%13 Aug →
ancient13–40.0125%13 Aug →
cache11–130.0433%13 Aug →
dust213–40.0014%12 Aug →
inferno13–50.0228%12 Aug →
inferno15–150.0215%12 Aug →
mirage13–40.0113%12 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0440%12 Aug →
shelter11–13-0.0421%12 Aug →
ancient13–100.0327%12 Aug →
inferno9–70.0112%12 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0031%12 Aug →
cache8–130.0726%10 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0112%10 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0313%10 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0325%5 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0316%3 Aug →
inferno13–90.0118%30 Jul →
ancient13–90.1027%30 Jul →
inferno7–130.0121%30 Jul →
inferno11–130.0220%29 Jul →
cache13–110.0222%29 Jul →
anubis13–90.0216%29 Jul →
cache10–130.0225%29 Jul →
inferno5–130.0317%28 Jul →
nuke10–130.0324%20 Jul →
dust213–100.0015%20 Jul →
cache11–130.0224%20 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0326%20 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0322%17 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0516%17 Jul →
ancient13–100.0522%17 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0221%17 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0132%16 Jul →
ancient13–100.0021%16 Jul →
inferno1–13-0.0445%16 Jul →
mirage16–14-0.0322%16 Jul →
inferno13–90.0720%16 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0214%15 Jul →
mirage6–130.0126%15 Jul →
mirage13–10.0717%15 Jul →
ancient13–60.0316%15 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0414%15 Jul →
anubis13–90.0013%15 Jul →
mirage13–100.0514%9 Jul →
anubis13–80.0913%9 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0325%9 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0421%9 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →