Silja  ໃᘏᗢ

Silja ໃᘏᗢ — CS2 Stats

76561199682201471[U:1:1721935743]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

591Tracked matches50%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating13,463Blue band · top ~36.5% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,463 +3,549 1 Jun – 28 Sept · 18 days played
9,09113,463peak 13,4631 Jun28 Sept
13,463Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-05-21

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 13,463
  • +1,479 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,537 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSilja ໃᘏᗢPREMIER13,463 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning19
Utility23

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–44–10Last 10046%Win rateLLWWTLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.9pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility2.3
Positioning1.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 46 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 673ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning1.9
Utility2.3
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time668ms−105ms
first ⅓ avg 773ms → last ⅓ avg 668ms
Headshot accuracy15.8%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 3 Aug →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · cache, 20 Jul →
477msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · overpass, 19 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 14dust2Weakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA1810–856%-0.04
cacheA169–756%-0.03
nukeA149–564%-0.05
infernoD123–925%-0.02
dust2D92–722%-0.04
ancientC94–544%-0.05
mirageA74–357%-0.03
poseidonB63–350%-0.03
overpassC52–340%-0.03
office—10–10%-0.03
vertigo—10–10%0.06
debris—10–10%-0.08
train—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
50%Win rate
0.42Avg K/D
42.0ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke333%0.457.3
Dust2250%0.305.0
Ancient1100%0.274.0
Overpass10%0.417.0
Cache1100%0.7112.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
673msReaction time
6.8%T opening success
14.0%CT opening success
0.32Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
4.22HE damage / grenade
3.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.1309° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3171 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust20–13-0.0110%30 Sept →
office4–13-0.0318%30 Sept →
dust213–40.0718%29 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0433%28 Sept →
anubis15–150.0117%28 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0426%24 Sept →
anubis8–130.0416%24 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0917%23 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0212%23 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0911%23 Sept →
vertigo7–130.0617%23 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0122%21 Sept →
poseidon9–60.0112%19 Sept →
overpass3–9-0.1414%19 Sept →
mirage13–90.0423%19 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.035%19 Sept →
anubis13–1-0.0613%19 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0214%19 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0520%19 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0510%14 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0418%14 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.077%14 Sept →
inferno12–120.0218%14 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0138%13 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0115%7 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0918%7 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0514%3 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0410%3 Sept →
overpass9–7-0.003%3 Sept →
poseidon8–8-0.1719%3 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0514%3 Sept →
overpass13–90.0118%1 Sept →
nuke8–0-0.020%1 Sept →
poseidon9–50.0820%30 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0512%30 Aug →
poseidon8–8-0.0635%29 Aug →
poseidon9–7-0.0325%29 Aug →
poseidon8–8-0.0417%29 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0623%26 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0918%26 Aug →
debris7–9-0.0817%25 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0520%25 Aug →
overpass7–130.0211%25 Aug →
dust213–30.0310%25 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0514%24 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0515%24 Aug →
nuke13–20.0119%24 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0710%24 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0322%20 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0912%20 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0211%20 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0919%18 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.065%17 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.098%17 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0022%17 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0920%10 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0619%10 Aug →
cache13–3-0.049%10 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0313%3 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0419%3 Aug →
inferno13–60.096%3 Aug →
ancient13–80.0010%30 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0221%30 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0038%27 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0219%27 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0824%26 Jul →
cache15–15-0.0322%26 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0519%23 Jul →
anubis15–15-0.0217%23 Jul →
cache14–16-0.0615%22 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0921%22 Jul →
anubis12–16-0.0615%20 Jul →
anubis13–4-0.0115%20 Jul →
cache1–13-0.0940%20 Jul →
anubis13–60.0215%19 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0417%19 Jul →
cache13–60.044%19 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.097%19 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0312%24 Jun →
cache13–7-0.010%24 Jun →
mirage13–3-0.0413%22 Jun →
mirage4–130.025%18 Jun →
cache7–13-0.029%17 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0116%17 Jun →
dust212–12-0.0426%17 Jun →
cache11–13-0.0222%16 Jun →
anubis13–3-0.0619%16 Jun →
dust26–13-0.107%15 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0517%15 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0315%13 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.049%11 Jun →
overpass3–13-0.0215%11 Jun →
ancient14–16-0.0313%10 Jun →
nuke13–3-0.0711%8 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0722%8 Jun →
train12–12-0.0210%8 Jun →
dust25–13-0.1128%1 Jun →
cache13–11-0.0410%1 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0515%1 Jun →
nuke13–9-0.0415%21 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.